96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17116786)
1. Comparison of tensile strength of resorbable plating systems used in monocortical mandible angle osteotomy repair.
Jain SA; Simmons OP; Hanemann MS; Baratta RV; Guerra AB; Metzinger SE
Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2006; 8(6):390-5. PubMed ID: 17116786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of fixation stability of resorbable versus titanium plate and screws in mandibular angle fractures.
Bayram B; Araz K; Uckan S; Balcik C
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1644-8. PubMed ID: 19615576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computerized analysis of resorbable polymer plates and screws for the rigid fixation of mandibular angle fractures.
Cox T; Kohn MW; Impelluso T
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Apr; 61(4):481-7; discussion 487-8. PubMed ID: 12684967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis of stress distribution on fixation of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy with resorbable plates and screws using the finite-element method.
Sarkarat F; Motamedi MH; Bohluli B; Moharamnejad N; Ansari S; Shahabi-Sirjani H
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jun; 70(6):1434-8. PubMed ID: 21820783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stability of midface fracture repair using absorbable plate and screw system pilot holes drilled and pin placement at angles other than 90°.
Carron MA; Zuliani G; Pereira L; Abuhamdan M; Thibault A; Dau N; Bir C
JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2014; 16(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 24158595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro comparison of screw versus plate fixation in the sagittal split osteotomy.
Foley WL; Beckman TW
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1992; 7(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 1291608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical evaluation of a new MatrixMandible plating system on cadaver mandibles.
Gateno J; Cookston C; Hsu SS; Stal DN; Durrani SK; Gold J; Ismaily S; Alexander JW; Noble PC; Xia JJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(11):1900-14. PubMed ID: 24012175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An in vitro comparison of an adjustable bone fixation system.
Van Sickels JE; Peterson GP; Holms S; Haug RH
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Nov; 63(11):1620-5. PubMed ID: 16243179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: advancement surgery.
Brasileiro BF; Grempel RG; Ambrosano GM; Passeri LA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):809-17. PubMed ID: 19304039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stability of skeletal Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures: titanium versus resorbable plates and screws for maxillary fixation.
Costa F; Robiony M; Zorzan E; Zerman N; Politi M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Apr; 64(4):642-51. PubMed ID: 16546644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Strength analysis of titanium and resorbable internal fixation in a mandibulotomy model.
Ricalde P; Engroff SL; Von Fraunhofer JA; Posnick JC
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Aug; 63(8):1180-3. PubMed ID: 16094588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fixation of bimaxillary osteotomies with resorbable plates and screws: experience in 20 consecutive cases.
Edwards RC; Kiely KD; Eppley BL
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Mar; 59(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 11243608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A biologic model for assessment of osseous strain patterns and plating systems in the human maxilla.
Alberts LR; Phillips KO; Tu HK; Stinson WW; Friedman A
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Jan; 61(1):79-88. PubMed ID: 12524613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A biomechanical evaluation of bilateral sagittal ramus osteotomy fixation techniques.
Peterson GP; Haug RH; Van Sickels J
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Sep; 63(9):1317-24. PubMed ID: 16122596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bioabsorbable plate and screw fixation in orthognathic surgery.
Eppley BL
J Craniofac Surg; 2007 Jul; 18(4):818-25. PubMed ID: 17667671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of stability of absorbable and titanium plate and screw fixation for sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Dolanmaz D; Uckan S; Isik K; Saglam H
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Apr; 42(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 15013544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of strains produced by titanium and poly D, L-lactide Acid plating systems to in vitro forces.
Chacon GE; Dillard FM; Clelland N; Rashid R
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Jul; 63(7):968-72. PubMed ID: 16003624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro biomechanical evaluation of the use of conventional and locking miniplate/screw systems for sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Ribeiro-Junior PD; Magro-Filho O; Shastri KA; Papageorge MB
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Apr; 68(4):724-30. PubMed ID: 19962812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical testing of resorbable screws used for mandibular sagittal split osteotomies.
Eppley BL; Sarver D; Pietrzak B
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 Dec; 57(12):1431-5. PubMed ID: 10596664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparative biomechanical evaluation of mandibular condyle fracture plating techniques.
Asprino L; Consani S; de Moraes M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Mar; 64(3):452-6. PubMed ID: 16487808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
