These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

60 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17117002)

  • 21. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) may modify the poor prognosis of stroke survivors with severe motor loss of the upper extremity: a preliminary study.
    Alon G; Levitt AF; McCarthy PA
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Aug; 87(8):627-36. PubMed ID: 18645322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of finger tracking combined with electrical stimulation on brain reorganization and hand function in subjects with stroke.
    Bhatt E; Nagpal A; Greer KH; Grunewald TK; Steele JL; Wiemiller JW; Lewis SM; Carey JR
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Oct; 182(4):435-47. PubMed ID: 17562035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of integrated volitional control electrical stimulation (IVES) on upper extremity function in chronic stroke.
    Yamaguchi T; Tanabe S; Muraoka Y; Imai S; Masakado Y; Hase K; Kimura A; Liu M
    Keio J Med; 2011; 60(3):90-5. PubMed ID: 21964036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of splinting on wrist contracture after stroke: a randomized controlled trial.
    Lannin NA; Cusick A; McCluskey A; Herbert RD
    Stroke; 2007 Jan; 38(1):111-6. PubMed ID: 17122432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effectiveness of upper limb functional electrical stimulation after stroke for the improvement of activities of daily living and motor function: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Eraifej J; Clark W; France B; Desando S; Moore D
    Syst Rev; 2017 Feb; 6(1):40. PubMed ID: 28245858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Hand dexterity rehabilitation using selective functional electrical stimulation in a person with stroke.
    Martín-Odriozola A; Rodríguez-de-Pablo C; Zabaleta-Rekondo H
    BMJ Case Rep; 2021 Aug; 14(8):. PubMed ID: 34389591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Influence of Visual Stimulation-Induced Passive Reproduction of Motor Images in the Brain on Motor Paralysis After Stroke.
    Aoyama T; Kanazawa A; Kohno Y; Watanabe S; Tomita K; Kaneko F
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2021; 15():674139. PubMed ID: 34239429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Perceptual simultaneity and its modulation during EMG-triggered motion induction with electrical muscle stimulation.
    Matsubara S; Wakisaka S; Aoyama K; Seaborn K; Hiyama A; Inami M
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0236497. PubMed ID: 32785230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Feasibility of single and combined with other treatments using transcranial direct current stimulation for chronic stroke: A pilot study.
    Hyakutake K; Morishita T; Saita K; Ogata T; Uehara Y; Shiota E; Inoue T
    SAGE Open Med; 2020; 8():2050312120940546. PubMed ID: 32685151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Veerbeek JM; van Wegen E; van Peppen R; van der Wees PJ; Hendriks E; Rietberg M; Kwakkel G
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e87987. PubMed ID: 24505342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A pilot study to measure upper extremity H-reflexes following neuromuscular electrical stimulation therapy after stroke.
    Stowe AM; Hughes-Zahner L; Barnes VK; Herbelin LL; Schindler-Ivens SM; Quaney BM
    Neurosci Lett; 2013 Feb; 535():1-6. PubMed ID: 23313593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effectiveness of finger-equipped electrode (FEE)-triggered electrical stimulation improving chronic stroke patients with severe hemiplegia.
    Inobe J; Kato T
    Brain Inj; 2013; 27(1):114-9. PubMed ID: 23252442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Event related desynchronization-modulated functional electrical stimulation system for stroke rehabilitation: a feasibility study.
    Takahashi M; Takeda K; Otaka Y; Osu R; Hanakawa T; Gouko M; Ito K
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2012 Aug; 9():56. PubMed ID: 22897888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A home-based rehabilitation program for the hemiplegic upper extremity by power-assisted functional electrical stimulation.
    Hara Y; Ogawa S; Tsujiuchi K; Muraoka Y
    Disabil Rehabil; 2008; 30(4):296-304. PubMed ID: 17852312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Neurorehabilitation with new functional electrical stimulation for hemiparetic upper extremity in stroke patients.
    Hara Y
    J Nippon Med Sch; 2008 Feb; 75(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 18360073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Novel neuromuscular electrical stimulation system for the upper limbs in chronic stroke patients: a feasibility study.
    Noma T; Matsumoto S; Shimodozono M; Iwase Y; Kawahira K
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 Jun; 93(6):503-10. PubMed ID: 24508928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effects of electromechanical wrist robot assistive system with neuromuscular electrical stimulation for stroke rehabilitation.
    Hu XL; Tong KY; Li R; Xue JJ; Ho SK; Chen P
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2012 Jun; 22(3):431-9. PubMed ID: 22277205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Hybrid Assistive Neuromuscular Dynamic Stimulation Therapy: A New Strategy for Improving Upper Extremity Function in Patients with Hemiparesis following Stroke.
    Fujiwara T; Kawakami M; Honaga K; Tochikura M; Abe K
    Neural Plast; 2017; 2017():2350137. PubMed ID: 28191352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Hybrid power-assisted functional electrical stimulation to improve hemiparetic upper-extremity function.
    Hara Y; Ogawa S; Muraoka Y
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Dec; 85(12):977-85. PubMed ID: 17117002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.