BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17117496)

  • 1. Mixture models for detecting differentially expressed genes in microarrays.
    Jones LB; Bean R; McLachlan GJ; Zhu JX
    Int J Neural Syst; 2006 Oct; 16(5):353-62. PubMed ID: 17117496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Determination of the differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments using local FDR.
    Aubert J; Bar-Hen A; Daudin JJ; Robin S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Sep; 5():125. PubMed ID: 15350197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A mixture model for estimating the local false discovery rate in DNA microarray analysis.
    Liao JG; Lin Y; Selvanayagam ZE; Shih WJ
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Nov; 20(16):2694-701. PubMed ID: 15145810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Normal uniform mixture differential gene expression detection for cDNA microarrays.
    Dean N; Raftery AE
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 6():173. PubMed ID: 16011807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A simple implementation of a normal mixture approach to differential gene expression in multiclass microarrays.
    McLachlan GJ; Bean RW; Jones LB
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jul; 22(13):1608-15. PubMed ID: 16632494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. False discovery rate, sensitivity and sample size for microarray studies.
    Pawitan Y; Michiels S; Koscielny S; Gusnanto A; Ploner A
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(13):3017-24. PubMed ID: 15840707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A GMM-IG framework for selecting genes as expression panel biomarkers.
    Wang M; Chen JY
    Artif Intell Med; 2010; 48(2-3):75-82. PubMed ID: 20004087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tail posterior probability for inference in pairwise and multiclass gene expression data.
    Bochkina N; Richardson S
    Biometrics; 2007 Dec; 63(4):1117-25. PubMed ID: 18078482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Regularization network-based gene selection for microarray data analysis.
    Zhou X; Mao KZ
    Int J Neural Syst; 2006 Oct; 16(5):341-52. PubMed ID: 17117495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identifying differentially expressed genes using false discovery rate controlling procedures.
    Reiner A; Yekutieli D; Benjamini Y
    Bioinformatics; 2003 Feb; 19(3):368-75. PubMed ID: 12584122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identification of differentially expressed genes and false discovery rate in microarray studies.
    Gusnanto A; Calza S; Pawitan Y
    Curr Opin Lipidol; 2007 Apr; 18(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 17353668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cross-platform analysis of cancer microarray data improves gene expression based classification of phenotypes.
    Warnat P; Eils R; Brors B
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Nov; 6():265. PubMed ID: 16271137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating the false discovery rate using nonparametric deconvolution.
    van de Wiel MA; Kim KI
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):806-15. PubMed ID: 17825012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A practical false discovery rate approach to identifying patterns of differential expression in microarray data.
    Grant GR; Liu J; Stoeckert CJ
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 21(11):2684-90. PubMed ID: 15797908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bias in the estimation of false discovery rate in microarray studies.
    Pawitan Y; Murthy KR; Michiels S; Ploner A
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Oct; 21(20):3865-72. PubMed ID: 16105901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A constrained polynomial regression procedure for estimating the local False Discovery Rate.
    Dalmasso C; Bar-Hen A; Broët P
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Jun; 8():229. PubMed ID: 17603882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A spline function approach for detecting differentially expressed genes in microarray data analysis.
    He W
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Nov; 20(17):2954-63. PubMed ID: 15180936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimating effect sizes of differentially expressed genes for power and sample-size assessments in microarray experiments.
    Matsui S; Noma H
    Biometrics; 2011 Dec; 67(4):1225-35. PubMed ID: 21627629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sample size for detecting differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments.
    Wei C; Li J; Bumgarner RE
    BMC Genomics; 2004 Nov; 5():87. PubMed ID: 15533245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identifying differentially expressed genes in cancer patients using a non-parameter Ising model.
    Li X; Feltus FA; Sun X; Wang JZ; Luo F
    Proteomics; 2011 Oct; 11(19):3845-52. PubMed ID: 21761563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.