These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
902 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17117542)
1. Assisted reproduction--Islamic views on the science of procreation. Ahmad NH Eubios J Asian Int Bioeth; 2003 Mar; 13(2):59-61. PubMed ID: 17117542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Islamic viewpoint on new assisted reproductive technologies. Fadel HE Fordham Urban Law J; 2002 Nov; 30(1):147-57. PubMed ID: 15868666 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Artificial procreation, societal reconceptions: legal insight from France. Jones DJ Am J Comp Law; 1988; 36(3):525-45. PubMed ID: 11659138 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Matters of life and death: inheritance consequences of reproductive technologies. Shapo HS Hofstra Law Rev; 1997; 25(4):1091-220. PubMed ID: 11858286 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Reproductive technologies: where are we headed? McCormick RA Loyola Law Rev; 1999; 45(2):269-85. PubMed ID: 16622957 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Assisted reproduction in Jewish law. Sinclair DB Fordham Urban Law J; 2002 Nov; 30(1):71-106. PubMed ID: 15868663 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Infertility Treatment Act 1995. No. 63 of 1995. Date of assent: 27 Jun 1995. Australia. Victoria Int Dig Health Legis; 1997; 48(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 11656775 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A response to the Vatican document on IVF and related issues. Overduin DCh Lutheran Theol J; 1987 Aug; 21(2):82-9. PubMed ID: 11658932 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. An expanded partnership with God? In vitro fertilization in Jewish ethics. Mackler AL J Relig Ethics; 1997; 25(2):277-304. PubMed ID: 11660548 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Of milk-mothers and sacred bonds: Islam, patriarchy, and new reproductive technologies. Zuhur S Creighton Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 25(5):1725-36. PubMed ID: 11653388 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Islamic perspectives in human reproduction. Serour GI Reprod Biomed Online; 2008; 17 Suppl 3():34-8. PubMed ID: 18983735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Where does a man stand on issues of assisted reproduction, surrogacy, artificial insemination within lesbian relationships and posthumous conception? Beem P Aust J Fam Law; 2004 Apr; 18(1):41-62. PubMed ID: 17058336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Parpalaix v. CECOS: Protecting Intent in Reproductive Technology. Katz GA Harv J Law Technol; 1998; 11(3):683-98. PubMed ID: 12731553 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The birds, the bees, and the deep freeze: is there international consensus in the debate over assisted reproductive technologies? Pitrolo EA Houst J Int Law; 1996; 19(1):147-206. PubMed ID: 12666682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Therapy or tampering? The ethics of reproductive technology. McCormick RA America (NY); 1985 Dec; 153(17):396-403. PubMed ID: 11658676 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Techniques of Assisted Reproduction: Act 35/1988. Spain Bol Of Estado Gac Madr Spain; 1988 Nov; No. 282():. PubMed ID: 12041504 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. New frontiers in conception: medical breakthroughs and moral dilemmas. Fleming AT N Y Times Mag; 1980 Jul; ():14-23, 42, 48+. PubMed ID: 11647742 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]