135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17117765)
1. Preoperative planning and intraoperative guidance for accurate computer-assisted minimally invasive hip resurfacing surgery.
Barrett AR; Davies BL; Gomes MP; Harris SJ; Henckel J; Jakopec M; Rodriguez y Baena FM; Cobb JP
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2006 Oct; 220(7):759-73. PubMed ID: 17117765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computer-assisted hip resurfacing surgery using the acrobot navigation system.
Barrett AR; Davies BL; Gomes MP; Harris SJ; Henckel J; Jakopec M; Kannan V; Rodriguez y Baena FM; Cobb JP
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2007 Oct; 221(7):773-85. PubMed ID: 18019464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Biomechanically based planning for joint saving operation of the hip joint].
Legal H; Ruder H
Orthopade; 1979 May; 8(3):224-44. PubMed ID: 15655943
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of achievable registration accuracy of the femur during minimally invasive total hip replacement.
Popescu FC; Viceconti M; Traina F; Toni A
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2005 Jul; 43(4):421-30. PubMed ID: 16255422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development and evaluation of an image-free computer-assisted impingement detection technique for total hip arthroplasty.
Renkawitz T; Haimerl M; Dohmen L; Woerner M; Springorum HR; Sendtner E; Heers G; Weber M; Grifka J
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2012 Dec; 226(12):911-8. PubMed ID: 23636954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does computer-assisted surgery improve accuracy and decrease the learning curve in hip resurfacing? A radiographic analysis.
Seyler TM; Lai LP; Sprinkle DI; Ward WG; Jinnah RH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Aug; 90 Suppl 3():71-80. PubMed ID: 18676940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical experience with computer navigation in revision total hip arthroplasty.
Franke J; Zheng G; Wendl K; Grützner PA; von Recum J
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2012 Dec; 226(12):919-26. PubMed ID: 23636955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimally invasive registration for computer-assisted orthopedic surgery: combining tracked ultrasound and bone surface points via the P-IMLOP algorithm.
Billings S; Kang HJ; Cheng A; Boctor E; Kazanzides P; Taylor R
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2015 Jun; 10(6):761-71. PubMed ID: 25895079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computer tomography prototyping and virtual procedure simulation in difficult cases of hip replacement surgery.
Parchi PD; Ferrari V; Piolanti N; Andreani L; Condino S; Evangelisti G; Lisanti M
Surg Technol Int; 2013 Sep; 23():228-34. PubMed ID: 23975443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Application of surgical navigation to total hip arthroplasty.
Ecker TM; Murphy SB
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2007 Oct; 221(7):699-712. PubMed ID: 18019458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Role of navigation in total hip arthroplasty.
Kelley TC; Swank ML
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Feb; 91 Suppl 1():153-8. PubMed ID: 19182044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery and robotic surgery in total hip arthroplasty.
Sugano N
Clin Orthop Surg; 2013 Mar; 5(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 23467021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preventing Leg Length Discrepancy and Instability After Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Sculco PK; Austin MS; Lavernia CJ; Rosenberg AG; Sierra RJ
Instr Course Lect; 2016; 65():225-41. PubMed ID: 27049193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A design for simulating and validating the nuss procedure for the minimally invasive correction of pectus excavatum.
Rechowicz KJ; Kelly R; Goretsky M; Frantz FW; Knisley SB; Nuss D; McKenzie FD
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2011; 163():473-5. PubMed ID: 21335841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computed tomography for preoperative planning in total hip arthroplasty: what radiologists need to know.
Huppertz A; Radmer S; Wagner M; Roessler T; Hamm B; Sparmann M
Skeletal Radiol; 2014 Aug; 43(8):1041-51. PubMed ID: 24622927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Soft tissue deformation tracking for robotic assisted minimally invasive surgery.
Stoyanov D; Yang GZ
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():254-7. PubMed ID: 19964473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of osteophyte depiction in CT for patient-specific guided hip resurfacing procedures.
Kunz M; Balaketheeswaran S; Ellis RE; Rudan JF
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2015 Jun; 10(6):717-26. PubMed ID: 25861892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Resurfacing versus conventional total hip arthroplasty - review of comparative clinical and basic science studies.
Marker DR; Strimbu K; McGrath MS; Zywiel MG; Mont MA
Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(2):120-7. PubMed ID: 19583538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Classification of coxarthrosis as the basis of operative joint salvage therapy. Biomechanics of cranial-lateral hip arthrosis; aim and technique of extension-valgisation osteotomy; aim and technique of extension-varus osteotomy, results].
Bombelli R
Orthopade; 1979 May; 8(3):245-63. PubMed ID: 15655944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Can an Augmented Reality Headset Improve Accuracy of Acetabular Cup Orientation in Simulated THA? A Randomized Trial.
Logishetty K; Western L; Morgan R; Iranpour F; Cobb JP; Auvinet E
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 May; 477(5):1190-1199. PubMed ID: 30507832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
