273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17118111)
1. Evaluating medical students' non-verbal communication during the objective structured clinical examination.
Ishikawa H; Hashimoto H; Kinoshita M; Fujimori S; Shimizu T; Yano E
Med Educ; 2006 Dec; 40(12):1180-7. PubMed ID: 17118111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Do medical students respond empathetically to a virtual patient?
Deladisma AM; Cohen M; Stevens A; Wagner P; Lok B; Bernard T; Oxendine C; Schumacher L; Johnsen K; Dickerson R; Raij A; Wells R; Duerson M; Harper JG; Lind DS;
Am J Surg; 2007 Jun; 193(6):756-60. PubMed ID: 17512291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of medical education on students' patient-satisfaction ratings.
Klamen DL; Williams RG
Acad Med; 1997 Jan; 72(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 9008571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does feedback matter? Practice-based learning for medical students after a multi-institutional clinical performance examination.
Srinivasan M; Hauer KE; Der-Martirosian C; Wilkes M; Gesundheit N
Med Educ; 2007 Sep; 41(9):857-65. PubMed ID: 17727526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Students' views on the use of real patients and simulated patients in undergraduate medical education.
Bokken L; Rethans JJ; van Heurn L; Duvivier R; Scherpbier A; van der Vleuten C
Acad Med; 2009 Jul; 84(7):958-63. PubMed ID: 19550197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Trained lay observers can reliably assess medical students' communication skills.
Bergus GR; Woodhead JC; Kreiter CD
Med Educ; 2009 Jul; 43(7):688-94. PubMed ID: 19573193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of assessing simulated bad news consultations on medical students' stress response and communication performance.
van Dulmen S; Tromp F; Grosfeld F; ten Cate O; Bensing J
Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2007; 32(8-10):943-50. PubMed ID: 17689196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The use of virtual patients to teach medical students history taking and communication skills.
Stevens A; Hernandez J; Johnsen K; Dickerson R; Raij A; Harrison C; DiPietro M; Allen B; Ferdig R; Foti S; Jackson J; Shin M; Cendan J; Watson R; Duerson M; Lok B; Cohen M; Wagner P; Lind DS
Am J Surg; 2006 Jun; 191(6):806-11. PubMed ID: 16720154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does the gender of the standardised patient influence candidate performance in an objective structured clinical examination?
Humphrey-Murto S; Touchie C; Wood TJ; Smee S
Med Educ; 2009 Jun; 43(6):521-5. PubMed ID: 19493175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Communication skills in standardized-patient assessment of final-year medical students: a psychometric study.
Guiton G; Hodgson CS; Delandshere G; Wilkerson L
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2004; 9(3):179-87. PubMed ID: 15316269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating verbal and non-verbal communication skills, in an ethnogeriatric OSCE.
Collins LG; Schrimmer A; Diamond J; Burke J
Patient Educ Couns; 2011 May; 83(2):158-62. PubMed ID: 20561763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing professionalism in the context of an objective structured clinical examination: an in-depth study of the rating process.
Mazor KM; Zanetti ML; Alper EJ; Hatem D; Barrett SV; Meterko V; Gammon W; Pugnaire MP
Med Educ; 2007 Apr; 41(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 17430277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing validity of standardized patient ratings of medical students' communication behavior using the Roter interaction analysis system.
Price EG; Windish DM; Magaziner J; Cooper LA
Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Jan; 70(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 18037602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effectiveness of unannounced standardised patients in the clinical setting as a teaching intervention.
Elman D; Hooks R; Tabak D; Regehr G; Freeman R
Med Educ; 2004 Sep; 38(9):969-73. PubMed ID: 15327678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Simulating the longitudinal doctor-patient relationship: experiences of simulated patients in successive consultations.
Linssen T; van Dalen J; Rethans JJ
Med Educ; 2007 Sep; 41(9):873-8. PubMed ID: 17727528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Medical students' perceptions of identity in communication skills training: a qualitative study.
Vågan A
Med Educ; 2009 Mar; 43(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 19250352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Do students develop better motivational interviewing skills through role-play with standardised patients or with student colleagues?
Mounsey AL; Bovbjerg V; White L; Gazewood J
Med Educ; 2006 Aug; 40(8):775-80. PubMed ID: 16869923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Student views on the effective teaching of physical examination skills: a qualitative study.
Martens MJ; Duvivier RJ; van Dalen J; Verwijnen GM; Scherpbier AJ; van der Vleuten CP
Med Educ; 2009 Feb; 43(2):184-91. PubMed ID: 19161490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Instructiveness of real patients and simulated patients in undergraduate medical education: a randomized experiment.
Bokken L; Rethans JJ; Jöbsis Q; Duvivier R; Scherpbier A; van der Vleuten C
Acad Med; 2010 Jan; 85(1):148-54. PubMed ID: 20042841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of medical students' written expressions of emotion and coping and standardized patients' ratings of student professionalism and communication skills.
Shapiro J; Lie D
Med Teach; 2004 Dec; 26(8):733-5. PubMed ID: 15763880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
