These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17118906)

  • 1. SII and fit-to-target analysis of compression system performance as a function of number of compression channels.
    Woods WS; Van Tasell DJ; Rickert ME; Trine TD
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Nov; 45(11):630-44. PubMed ID: 17118906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using genetic algorithms with subjective input from human subjects: implications for fitting hearing aids and cochlear implants.
    Başkent D; Eiler CL; Edwards B
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):370-80. PubMed ID: 17485986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. NAL-NL1 procedure for fitting nonlinear hearing aids: characteristics and comparisons with other procedures.
    Byrne D; Dillon H; Ching T; Katsch R; Keidser G
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2001 Jan; 12(1):37-51. PubMed ID: 11214977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of Hearing Aid Manufacturers' Software-Derived Fittings to DSL v5.0 Pediatric Targets.
    Folkeard P; Bagatto M; Scollie S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 May; 31(5):354-362. PubMed ID: 31639078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ranking hearing aid input-output functions for understanding low-, conversational-, and high-level speech in multitalker babble.
    Chung K; Killion MC; Christensen LA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):304-22. PubMed ID: 17463231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combined effects of frequency compression-expansion and shift on speech recognition.
    Başkent D; Shannon RV
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):277-89. PubMed ID: 17485977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Temporal envelope changes of compression and speech rate: combined effects on recognition for older adults.
    Jenstad LM; Souza PE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Oct; 50(5):1123-38. PubMed ID: 17905900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Phonological mismatch makes aided speech recognition in noise cognitively taxing.
    Rudner M; Foo C; Rönnberg J; Lunner T
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):879-92. PubMed ID: 17982373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Children's speech recognition scores: the Speech Intelligibility Index and proficiency factors for age and hearing level.
    Scollie SD
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):543-56. PubMed ID: 18469717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of noise source configuration on directional benefit using symmetric and asymmetric directional hearing aid fittings.
    Hornsby BW; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 17496669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intelligibility of speech in noise at high presentation levels: effects of hearing loss and frequency region.
    Summers V; Cord MT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1130-7. PubMed ID: 17672659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of hearing aid compression parameters on the short-term dynamic range of continuous speech.
    Henning RL; Bentler RA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Apr; 51(2):471-84. PubMed ID: 18367690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measurement of individual loudness functions by trisection of loudness ranges.
    Villchur E; Killion MC
    Ear Hear; 2008 Oct; 29(5):693-703. PubMed ID: 18769270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the desired sensation level [input/output] algorithm for adults with hearing loss: the acceptable range for amplified conversational speech.
    Jenstad LM; Bagatto MP; Seewald RC; Scollie SD; Cornelisse LE; Scicluna R
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):793-811. PubMed ID: 17982367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Subjective and objective effects of fast and slow compression on the perception of reverberant speech in listeners with hearing loss.
    Shi LF; Doherty KA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 51(5):1328-40. PubMed ID: 18664685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of S-shaped input-output functions for noise suppression in cochlear implants.
    Kasturi K; Loizou PC
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):402-11. PubMed ID: 17485989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Longitudinal changes in speech recognition in older persons.
    Dubno JR; Lee FS; Matthews LJ; Ahlstrom JB; Horwitz AR; Mills JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):462-75. PubMed ID: 18177174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech perception in congenitally, pre-lingually and post-lingually deaf children expressed in an equivalent hearing loss value.
    Rotteveel LJ; Snik AF; Vermeulen AM; Cremers CW; Mylanus EA
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2008 Dec; 33(6):560-9. PubMed ID: 19126130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Personality, hearing problems, and amplification characteristics: contributions to self-report hearing aid outcomes.
    Cox RM; Alexander GC; Gray GA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):141-62. PubMed ID: 17496667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.