97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17118909)
1. Prevalence of cochlear implants in postlingually deafened adults in a Swedish region.
Claeson M; Ringdahl A
Int J Audiol; 2006 Nov; 45(11):670-4. PubMed ID: 17118909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cochlear implants for adults obtaining marginal benefit from acoustic amplification: a European study.
Fraysse B; Dillier N; Klenzner T; Laszig R; Manrique M; Morera Perez C; Morgon AH; Müller-Deile J; Ramos Macias A
Am J Otol; 1998 Sep; 19(5):591-7. PubMed ID: 9752966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Speech and language development in a population of Swedish hearing-impaired pre-school children, a cross-sectional study.
Borg E; Edquist G; Reinholdson AC; Risberg A; McAllister B
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Jul; 71(7):1061-77. PubMed ID: 17512613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cochlear implant performance in senior citizens.
Labadie RF; Carrasco VN; Gilmer CH; Pillsbury HC
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2000 Oct; 123(4):419-24. PubMed ID: 11020178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hybrid cochlear implantation: clinical results and critical review in 13 cases.
Luetje CM; Thedinger BS; Buckler LR; Dawson KL; Lisbona KL
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Jun; 28(4):473-8. PubMed ID: 17529849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Residual hearing preservation after cochlear implantation: comparison between straight and perimodiolar implants.
Soda-Merhy A; Gonzalez-Valenzuela L; Tirado-Gutierrez C
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Sep; 139(3):399-404. PubMed ID: 18722221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intratympanic dexamethasone for sudden sensorineural hearing loss after failure of systemic therapy.
Haynes DS; O'Malley M; Cohen S; Watford K; Labadie RF
Laryngoscope; 2007 Jan; 117(1):3-15. PubMed ID: 17202923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hearing preservation outcomes with different cochlear implant electrodes: Nucleus® Hybrid™-L24 and Nucleus Freedom™ CI422.
Jurawitz MC; Büchner A; Harpel T; Schüssler M; Majdani O; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T
Audiol Neurootol; 2014; 19(5):293-309. PubMed ID: 25277083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Residual hearing thresholds in cochlear implantation and reimplantation.
Di Nardo W; Cantore I; Cianfrone F; Melillo P; Rigante M; Paludetti G
Audiol Neurootol; 2007; 12(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 17259703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Audiological application criteria for implantable hearing aid devices: a clinical experience at the Nijmegen ORL clinic.
Verhaegen VJ; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW; Snik AF
Laryngoscope; 2008 Sep; 118(9):1645-9. PubMed ID: 18677283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Implication of central asymmetry in speech processing on selecting the ear for cochlear implantation.
Morris LG; Mallur PS; Roland JT; Waltzman SB; Lalwani AK
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Jan; 28(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 17195742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A cohort study of patients with tinnitus and sensorineural hearing loss in a Swedish population.
Zarenoe R; Ledin T
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2013 Feb; 40(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 22652486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.
Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Labadie RF; Haynes DS
Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 17609614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cochlear implantation outcome in prelingually deafened young adults. A speech perception study.
Santarelli R; De Filippi R; Genovese E; Arslan E
Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 18259078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gamma knife radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas: results of hearing preservation in relation to the cochlear radiation dose.
Timmer FC; Hanssens PE; van Haren AE; Mulder JJ; Cremers CW; Beynon AJ; van Overbeeke JJ; Graamans K
Laryngoscope; 2009 Jun; 119(6):1076-81. PubMed ID: 19399836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cochlear Implant Outcomes in Prelingually Deafened Adults with and without Sound Deprivation: Are There Differences in Quality of Life?
Canale A; Macocco F; Ndrev D; Gabella G; Scozzari G; Albera R; Pecorari G; Albera A
Med Sci Monit; 2021 May; 27():e930232. PubMed ID: 34001843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cochlear implants: indications in groups of patients with borderline indications. A review.
Quaranta N; Bartoli R; Quaranta A
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 2004 May; (552):68-73. PubMed ID: 15219051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Mayo Clinic experience with the cochlear implant.
Facer GW; Peterson A; Brey RH; Marion M; Cevette M; Balko K; Green JD; Rose D; Pool A
Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Mar; 73(3):149-52, 154-5. PubMed ID: 8205975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Distribution of hearing loss characteristics in a clinical population.
Margolis RH; Saly GL
Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):524-32. PubMed ID: 18600134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
