These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17119463)
1. Using navigation to measure rotation kinematics during ACL reconstruction. Colombet P; Robinson J; Christel P; Franceschi JP; Djian P Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Jan; 454():59-65. PubMed ID: 17119463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of anterior cruciate ligament bundles on knee kinematics: clinical assessment using computer-assisted navigation. Robinson J; Carrat L; Granchi C; Colombet P Am J Sports Med; 2007 Dec; 35(12):2006-13. PubMed ID: 17954928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative kinematic evaluation of all-inside single-bundle and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical study. Tsai AG; Wijdicks CA; Walsh MP; Laprade RF Am J Sports Med; 2010 Feb; 38(2):263-72. PubMed ID: 19966094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Knee laxity control in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction versus anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and lateral tenodesis: clinical assessment using computer-assisted navigation. Colombet P Am J Sports Med; 2011 Jun; 39(6):1248-54. PubMed ID: 21335352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Anatomical and nonanatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: importance of femoral tunnel location on knee kinematics. Zantop T; Diermann N; Schumacher T; Schanz S; Fu FH; Petersen W Am J Sports Med; 2008 Apr; 36(4):678-85. PubMed ID: 18296542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of conventional, central, and horizontal single-bundle virtual graft positions. Brophy RH; Pearle AD Am J Sports Med; 2009 Jul; 37(7):1317-23. PubMed ID: 19329787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comprehensive kinematic study using navigation. Ferretti A; Monaco E; Labianca L; De Carli A; Maestri B; Conteduca F Am J Sports Med; 2009 Aug; 37(8):1548-53. PubMed ID: 19564423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Changes in the length of virtual anterior cruciate ligament fibers during stability testing: a comparison of conventional single-bundle reconstruction and native anterior cruciate ligament. Brophy RH; Voos JE; Shannon FJ; Granchi CC; Wickiewicz TL; Warren RF; Pearle AD Am J Sports Med; 2008 Nov; 36(11):2196-203. PubMed ID: 18669985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing stability of different single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques: a cadaveric study using navigation. Musahl V; Voos JE; O'Loughlin PF; Choi D; Stueber V; Kendoff D; Pearle AD Arthroscopy; 2010 Sep; 26(9 Suppl):S41-8. PubMed ID: 20692120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of different tensioning strategies on knee laxity and graft tension after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Cuomo P; Rama KR; Bull AM; Amis AA Am J Sports Med; 2007 Dec; 35(12):2083-90. PubMed ID: 17978000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of the effect of central anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on pivot-shift kinematics. Bedi A; Musahl V; O'Loughlin P; Maak T; Citak M; Dixon P; Pearle AD Am J Sports Med; 2010 Sep; 38(9):1788-94. PubMed ID: 20566720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of graft fixation angles on anteroposterior and rotational knee laxity in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: evaluation using computerized navigation. Koga H; Muneta T; Yagishita K; Ju YJ; Sekiya I Am J Sports Med; 2012 Mar; 40(3):615-23. PubMed ID: 22109546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Vertical femoral tunnel placement results in rotational knee laxity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Lee MC; Seong SC; Lee S; Chang CB; Park YK; Jo H; Kim CH Arthroscopy; 2007 Jul; 23(7):771-8. PubMed ID: 17637414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of 3-dimensional obliquity and anisometric characteristics of anterior cruciate ligament graft positions using surgical navigation. Pearle AD; Shannon FJ; Granchi C; Wickiewicz TL; Warren RF Am J Sports Med; 2008 Aug; 36(8):1534-41. PubMed ID: 18390491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical comparison of anatomic double-bundle, anatomic single-bundle, and nonanatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Kondo E; Merican AM; Yasuda K; Amis AA Am J Sports Med; 2011 Feb; 39(2):279-88. PubMed ID: 21239692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Replication of the range of native anterior cruciate ligament fiber length change behavior achieved by different grafts: measurement using computer-assisted navigation. Robinson J; Stanford FC; Kendoff D; Stüber V; Pearle AD Am J Sports Med; 2009 Jul; 37(7):1406-11. PubMed ID: 19369575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction after valgus high tibial osteotomy: a biomechanical study. Kilger RH; Stehle J; Fisk JA; Thomas M; Miura K; Woo SL Am J Sports Med; 2006 Jun; 34(6):961-7. PubMed ID: 16436536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of 2 surgical techniques of posterolateral corner reconstruction of the knee. Nau T; Chevalier Y; Hagemeister N; Deguise JA; Duval N Am J Sports Med; 2005 Dec; 33(12):1838-45. PubMed ID: 16157848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tibial rotation in single- and double-bundle ACL reconstruction: a kinematic 3-D in vivo analysis. Claes S; Neven E; Callewaert B; Desloovere K; Bellemans J Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2011 Dec; 19 Suppl 1():S115-21. PubMed ID: 21667089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]