BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17120373)

  • 1. Knowing sin: making sure good science doesn't go bad.
    Greely HT
    Cerebrum; 2006 Jun; ():1-8. PubMed ID: 17120373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neuroethics.
    Glannon W
    Bioethics; 2006 Feb; 20(1):37-52. PubMed ID: 16680906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. No brainer--can we cope with the ethical ramifications of new knowledge of the human brain?
    Caplan A; Mobley W
    Cerebrum; 2002; 4(3):63. PubMed ID: 16619415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neuroethical theories.
    Häyry M
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2010 Apr; 19(2):165-78. PubMed ID: 20226100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. DARPA on your mind.
    Moreno JD
    Cerebrum; 2004; 6(4):91-9. PubMed ID: 15986543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mapping the future.
    Hall ZW
    Cerebrum; 2002; 4(3):72-6. PubMed ID: 16619420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can bad science be good evidence? Neuroscience, lie detection, and beyond.
    Schauer F
    Cornell Law Rev; 2010 Sep; 95(6):1191-220. PubMed ID: 20939147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ethics and the practice of brain science.
    Lo B; Albert MS; Hyman S; Parens E; Wolpe PR; Mobley W
    Cerebrum; 2002; 4(3):64-6. PubMed ID: 16619416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A more child-like science.
    Talbott S
    New Atlantis; 2004; 4():23-31. PubMed ID: 15586961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lure of lie detectors spooks ethicists.
    Nature; 2006 Jun; 441(7096):918-9. PubMed ID: 16791164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Emerging neurotechnologies for lie-detection: where are we now? An appraisal of Wolpe, Foster and Langleben's "Emerging neurotechnologies for lie-detection: promise and perils" five years later.
    Hyman SE
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Oct; 10(10):49-50. PubMed ID: 20945267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neuroethics: a philosophical challenge.
    Evers K
    Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(2):31-3; discussion W3-4. PubMed ID: 16036696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Brain imaging and the Bill of Rights: memory detection technologies and American criminal justice.
    Fox D
    Am J Bioeth; 2008 Jan; 8(1):34-6; discussion W1-4. PubMed ID: 18236335
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Therapeutic and cosmetic psychopharmacology. Risks and limits].
    Echarte Alonso LE
    Cuad Bioet; 2009; 20(69):211-30. PubMed ID: 19507923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Duped: can brain scans uncover lies?
    Talbot M
    New Yorker; 2007 Jul; ():52-61. PubMed ID: 17600971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neuroimaging: revolutionary research tool or a post-modern phrenology?
    Kennedy D
    Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(2):19; discussion W3-4. PubMed ID: 16036689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The age of neuroelectronics.
    Keiper A
    New Atlantis; 2006; 11():4-41. PubMed ID: 16789311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The democratic side of science-fiction].
    Lecellier CH
    Med Sci (Paris); 2011 Apr; 27(4):433-8. PubMed ID: 21524410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neuroethics: a guide for the perplexed.
    Farah MJ
    Cerebrum; 2004; 6(4):29-38. PubMed ID: 15986533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Brain imaging ready to detect terrorists, say neuroscientists.
    Wild J
    Nature; 2005 Sep; 437(7058):457. PubMed ID: 16177747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.