106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17120566)
1. Mechanism and elimination of a water vapor interference in the measurement of ozone by UV absorbance.
Wilson KL; Birks JW
Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Oct; 40(20):6361-7. PubMed ID: 17120566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of ultraviolet absorbance, chemiluminescence, and DOAS instruments for ambient ozone monitoring.
Williams EJ; Fehsenfeld FC; Jobson BT; Kuster WC; Goldan PD; Stutz J; McClenny WA
Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Sep; 40(18):5755-62. PubMed ID: 17007137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of chemiluminescence and ultraviolet ozone monitor responses in the presence of humidity and photochemical pollutants.
Kleindienst TE; Hudgens EE; Smith DF; McElroy FF; Bufalini JJ
Air Waste; 1993 Feb; 43(2):213-22. PubMed ID: 15739516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Field testing of new-technology ambient air ozone monitors.
Ollison WM; Crow W; Spicer CW
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2013 Jul; 63(7):855-63. PubMed ID: 23926854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intrinsic UV absorption spectrometry observed with a liquid core waveguide as a sensor technique for monitoring ozone in water.
Le T; Tao S
Analyst; 2011 Aug; 136(16):3335-42. PubMed ID: 21743914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A re-examination of ambient air ozone monitor interferences.
Spicer CW; Joseph DW; Ollison WM
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2010 Nov; 60(11):1353-64. PubMed ID: 21141429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development, testing, and deployment of an air sampling manifold for spiking elemental and oxidized mercury during the Reno Atmospheric Mercury Intercomparison Experiment (RAMIX).
Finley BD; Jaffe DA; Call K; Lyman S; Gustin MS; Peterson C; Miller M; Lyman T
Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Jul; 47(13):7277-84. PubMed ID: 23441676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Miniature Personal Ozone Monitor Based on UV Absorbance.
Andersen PC; Williford CJ; Birks JW
Anal Chem; 2010 Oct; 82(19):7924-7928. PubMed ID: 21461365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Field comparison of passive samplers versus UV-photometric analyser to measure surface ozone in a Mediterranean area.
Delgado Saborit JM; Esteve Cano VJ
J Environ Monit; 2007 Jun; 9(6):610-5. PubMed ID: 17554433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Field evaluations of newly available "interference-free" monitors for nitrogen dioxide and ozone at near-road and conventional National Ambient Air Quality Standards compliance sites.
Leston AR; Ollison WM
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Nov; 67(11):1240-1248. PubMed ID: 28633004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ozone monitoring using differential optical absorption spectroscopy (DOAS) and UV photometry instruments in Sohar, Oman.
Nawahda A
Environ Monit Assess; 2015 Aug; 187(8):485. PubMed ID: 26138853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measurement of atmospheric ozone by cavity ring-down spectroscopy.
Washenfelder RA; Wagner NL; Dube WP; Brown SS
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Apr; 45(7):2938-44. PubMed ID: 21366216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measurement of microenvironmental ozone concentrations in Durham, North Carolina, using a 2B Technologies 205 Federal Equivalent Method monitor and an interference-free 2B Technologies 211 monitor.
Johnson T; Capel J; Ollison W
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2014 Mar; 64(3):360-71. PubMed ID: 24701694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ground-based zenith sky abundances and in situ gas cross sections for ozone and nitrogen dioxide with the Earth Observing System Aura Ozone Monitoring Instrument.
Dobber M; Dirksen R; Voors R; Mount GH; Levelt P
Appl Opt; 2005 May; 44(14):2846-56. PubMed ID: 15943338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Study of the validity and reproducibility of passive ozone monitors].
Cortez-Lugo M; Romieu I; Palazuelos-Rendón E; Hernández-Avila M
Salud Publica Mex; 1995; 37(3):219-23. PubMed ID: 7676348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of colorimetric ozone detection papers with high ultraviolet resistance using ultraviolet absorbers.
Miwa T; Maruo YY; Akaoka K; Kunioka T; Nakamura J
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2009 Jul; 59(7):801-8. PubMed ID: 19645264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mapping tropospheric ozone profiles from an airborne ultraviolet-visible spectrometer.
Liu X; Sioris CE; Chance K; Kurosu TP; Newchurch MJ; Martin RV; Palmer PI
Appl Opt; 2005 Jun; 44(16):3312-9. PubMed ID: 15943268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ozone measurement with silica cartidges and HRGC-MS analysis.
Cecinato A; Di Palo V; Possanzini M
Fresenius J Anal Chem; 2001 Apr; 369(7-8):652-6. PubMed ID: 11371066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of relative humidity and ozone on the sampling of volatile organic compounds on carbotrap/carbosieve adsorbents.
Palluau F; Mirabel P; Millet M
Environ Monit Assess; 2007 Apr; 127(1-3):177-87. PubMed ID: 16897502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Concentration measurements of ozone in the 1200-300ppbv range: an intercomparison between the BNM ultraviolet standard and infrared methods.
Dufour G; Valentin A; Henry A; Hurtmans D; Camy-Peyret C
Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc; 2004 Dec; 60(14):3345-52. PubMed ID: 15561619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
