These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17120712)

  • 1. Does energy expenditure affect the perception of egocentric distance? A failure to replicate experiment 1 of Proffitt, Stefanucci, Banton, and Epstein (2003).
    Hutchison JJ; Loomis JM
    Span J Psychol; 2006 Nov; 9(2):332-9; discussion 340-8. PubMed ID: 17120712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of effort in perceiving distance.
    Proffitt DR; Stefanucci J; Banton T; Epstein W
    Psychol Sci; 2003 Mar; 14(2):106-12. PubMed ID: 12661670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The various perceptions of distance: an alternative view of how effort affects distance judgments.
    Woods AJ; Philbeck JW; Danoff JV
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Aug; 35(4):1104-17. PubMed ID: 19653752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Who is being deceived? The experimental demands of wearing a backpack.
    Durgin FH; Baird JA; Greenburg M; Russell R; Shaughnessy K; Waymouth S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Oct; 16(5):964-9. PubMed ID: 19815806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distances appear different on hills.
    Stefanucci JK; Proffitt DR; Banton T; Epstein W
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Aug; 67(6):1052-60. PubMed ID: 16396013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Social scaling of extrapersonal space: target objects are judged as closer when the reference frame is a human agent with available movement potentialities.
    Fini C; Brass M; Committeri G
    Cognition; 2015 Jan; 134():50-6. PubMed ID: 25460378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceptually walking in another's shoes: goals and memories constrain spatial perception.
    Vinson DW; Jordan JS; Hund AM
    Psychol Res; 2017 Jan; 81(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 26450369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. More than just perception-action recalibration: walking through a virtual environment causes rescaling of perceived space.
    Kelly JW; Donaldson LS; Sjolund LA; Freiberg JB
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Oct; 75(7):1473-85. PubMed ID: 23839015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceiving virtual geographical slant: action influences perception.
    Creem-Regehr SH; Gooch AA; Sahm CS; Thompson WB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Oct; 30(5):811-821. PubMed ID: 15462622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perception-action dissociations of a walkable Müller-Lyer configuration.
    Wraga M; Creem SH; Proffitt DR
    Psychol Sci; 2000 May; 11(3):239-43. PubMed ID: 11273410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Revisiting the effect of quality of graphics on distance judgments in virtual environments: a comparison of verbal reports and blind walking.
    Kunz BR; Wouters L; Smith D; Thompson WB; Creem-Regehr SH
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Aug; 71(6):1284-93. PubMed ID: 19633344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Manipulation of expended effort and intent does not affect estimates of slant or distance.
    Shaffer DM; Greer KM; Schaffer JT
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Jul; 45(7):855-862. PubMed ID: 31008630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correcting distance estimates by interacting with immersive virtual environments: effects of task and available sensory information.
    Waller D; Richardson AR
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Mar; 14(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 18377167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using verbal and blind-walking distance estimates to investigate the two visual systems hypothesis.
    Andre J; Rogers S
    Percept Psychophys; 2006 Apr; 68(3):353-61. PubMed ID: 16900829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Effect of a Backpack Hip Strap on Energy Expenditure While Walking.
    Pigman J; Sullivan W; Leigh S; Hosick PA
    Hum Factors; 2017 Dec; 59(8):1214-1221. PubMed ID: 28892419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dissociation between visual perception of allocentric distance and visually directed walking of its extent.
    Kudoh N
    Perception; 2005; 34(11):1399-416. PubMed ID: 16355744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual perception and the guidance of locomotion without vision to previously seen targets.
    Rieser JJ; Ashmead DH; Talor CR; Youngquist GA
    Perception; 1990; 19(5):675-89. PubMed ID: 2103000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of visual and nonvisual sensory inputs to walked distance in a blind-walking task.
    Ellard CG; Shaughnessy SC
    Perception; 2003; 32(5):567-78. PubMed ID: 12854643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the anisotropy of perceived ground extents and the interpretation of walked distance as a measure of perception.
    Li Z; Sun E; Strawser CJ; Spiegel A; Klein B; Durgin FH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):477-93. PubMed ID: 22889186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Müller-Lyer-type illusion of egocentric distance with 3D convex and concave objects.
    Gordon IE; Day RH; Dorwood F
    Scand J Psychol; 1993 Jun; 34(2):97-106. PubMed ID: 8322048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.