These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17120845)

  • 1. Errors in judging information about reflections in mirrors.
    Lawson R; Bertamini M
    Perception; 2006; 35(9):1265-88. PubMed ID: 17120845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mirrors, mirrors on the wall…the ubiquitous multiple reflection error.
    Lawson R
    Cognition; 2012 Jan; 122(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 21889132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Naïve predictions of motion and orientation in mirrors: From what we see to what we expect reflections to do.
    Savardi U; Bianchi I; Bertamini M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 May; 134(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 20015479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Naive optics: acting on mirror reflections.
    Hecht H; Bertamini M; Gamer M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Oct; 31(5):1023-38. PubMed ID: 16262496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Naive optics: Predicting and perceiving reflections in mirrors.
    Bertamini M; Spooner A; Hecht H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):982-1002. PubMed ID: 14585018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reflections in art.
    Cavanagh P; Chao J; Wang D
    Spat Vis; 2008; 21(3-5):261-70. PubMed ID: 18534102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Through the looking glass: how the relationship between an object and its reflection affects the perception of distance and size.
    Jones LA; Bertamini M
    Perception; 2007; 36(11):1572-94. PubMed ID: 18265840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. People cannot locate the projection of an object on the surface of a mirror.
    Lawson R
    Cognition; 2010 May; 115(2):336-42. PubMed ID: 20096408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of refractive error on size constancy and shape constancy.
    Leibowitz HW; Wilcox SB; Post RB
    Perception; 1978; 7(5):557-62. PubMed ID: 733446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Overestimation of the projected size of objects on the surface of mirrors and windows.
    Lawson R; Bertamini M; Liu D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Oct; 33(5):1027-44. PubMed ID: 17924805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. My face through the looking-glass: the effect of mirror reversal on reflection size estimation.
    Dieguez S; Scherer J; Blanke O
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Dec; 20(4):1452-9. PubMed ID: 21723147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of object size and surface shape on shape constancy from stereo.
    Champion RA; Simmons DR; Mamassian P
    Perception; 2004; 33(2):237-47. PubMed ID: 15109164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dissociation between visual perception of allocentric distance and visually directed walking of its extent.
    Kudoh N
    Perception; 2005; 34(11):1399-416. PubMed ID: 16355744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What counts? Visual and verbal cues interact to influence what is considered a countable thing.
    Chesney DL; Gelman R
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Jul; 43(5):798-810. PubMed ID: 25623514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Self-training of dynamic touch: striking improves judgment by wielding.
    Stephen DG; Arzamarski R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1717-23. PubMed ID: 19933557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Understanding 2D projections on mirrors and on windows.
    Bertamini M; Lawson R; Liu D
    Spat Vis; 2008; 21(3-5):273-89. PubMed ID: 18534104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Venus effect in real life and in photographs.
    Bertamini M; Lawson R; Jones L; Winters M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1948-64. PubMed ID: 20952791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual learning in the hyperacuity range in adults.
    Fahle M
    Ger J Ophthalmol; 1993 Apr; 2(2):83-6. PubMed ID: 8485444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are face representations viewpoint dependent? A stereo advantage for generalizing across different views of faces.
    Burke D; Taubert J; Higman T
    Vision Res; 2007 Jul; 47(16):2164-9. PubMed ID: 17572467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of field of view on the perception of 3D slant from texture.
    Todd JT; Thaler L; Dijkstra TM
    Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(12):1501-17. PubMed ID: 15781069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.