149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17120915)
41. SINERGIA laparoscopic virtual reality simulator: didactic design and technical development.
Lamata P; Gómez EJ; Sánchez-Margallo FM; López O; Monserrat C; García V; Alberola C; Florido MA; Ruiz J; Usón J
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2007 Mar; 85(3):273-83. PubMed ID: 17270312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Action- and workflow-driven augmented reality for computer-aided medical procedures.
Navab N; Traub J; Sielhorst T; Feuerstein M; Bichlmeier C
IEEE Comput Graph Appl; 2007; 27(5):10-4. PubMed ID: 17913019
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. A novel laparoscopic mesh placement part task trainer.
Devarajan V; Wang X; Shen Y; Eberhart R; Watson MJ; Jones D; Villegas L
Int J Med Robot; 2006 Dec; 2(4):312-20. PubMed ID: 17520649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Construct and face validity and task workload for laparoscopic camera navigation: virtual reality versus videotrainer systems at the SAGES Learning Center.
Stefanidis D; Haluck R; Pham T; Dunne JB; Reinke T; Markley S; Korndorffer JR; Arellano P; Jones DB; Scott DJ
Surg Endosc; 2007 Jul; 21(7):1158-64. PubMed ID: 17149551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Pneumoperitoneum technique simulation in laparoscopic surgery on lamb liver samples and 3D reconstruction.
Martínez-Martínez F; Rupérez MJ; Lago MA; López-Mir F; Monserrat C; Alcañíz M
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2011; 163():348-50. PubMed ID: 21335816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. A hybrid cutting approach for hysteroscopy simulation.
Harders M; Steinemann D; Gross M; Székely G
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2005; 8(Pt 2):567-74. PubMed ID: 16686005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Role of virtual reality simulation in teaching and assessing technical skills in endovascular intervention.
Ahmed K; Keeling AN; Fakhry M; Ashrafian H; Aggarwal R; Naughton PA; Darzi A; Cheshire N; Athanasiou T; Hamady M
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2010 Jan; 21(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 20123191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Modelling and evaluation of surgical performance using hidden Markov models.
Megali G; Sinigaglia S; Tonet O; Dario P
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Oct; 53(10):1911-9. PubMed ID: 17019854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Dynamic cylindrical free-form deformation for interactive simulation of tool-tissue interaction.
Ahn W; Lee DY
Int J Med Robot; 2013 Mar; 9(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 22473640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Augmented versus virtual reality laparoscopic simulation: what is the difference? A comparison of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic simulator versus LapSim virtual reality laparoscopic simulator.
Botden SM; Buzink SN; Schijven MP; Jakimowicz JJ
World J Surg; 2007 Apr; 31(4):764-72. PubMed ID: 17361356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. [Tools for laparoscopic skill development - available trainers and simulators].
Jaksa L; Haidegger T; Galambos P; Kiss R
Orv Hetil; 2017 Oct; 158(40):1570-1576. PubMed ID: 28967265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The efficacy of virtual reality simulation training in laparoscopy: a systematic review of randomized trials.
Larsen CR; Oestergaard J; Ottesen BS; Soerensen JL
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2012 Sep; 91(9):1015-28. PubMed ID: 22693954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Bimanual haptic workstation for laparoscopic surgery simulation.
Devarajan V; Scott D; Jones D; Rege R; Eberhart R; Lindahl C; Tanguy P; Fernandez R
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 81():126-8. PubMed ID: 11317725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Algorithmic tools for real-time microsurgery simulation.
Brown J; Sorkin S; Latombe JC; Montgomery K; Stephanides M
Med Image Anal; 2002 Sep; 6(3):289-300. PubMed ID: 12270233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Pq-space based non-photorealistic rendering for augmented reality.
Lerotic M; Chung AJ; Mylonas G; Yang GZ
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2007; 10(Pt 2):102-9. PubMed ID: 18044558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. A new virtual-reality training module for laparoscopic surgical skills and equipment handling: can multitasking be trained? A randomized controlled trial.
Bongers PJ; Diederick van Hove P; Stassen LP; Dankelman J; Schreuder HW
J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(2):184-91. PubMed ID: 25439179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Proficiency-based training of medical students using virtual simulators for laparoscopy and robot-assisted surgery: results of a pilot study.
Moglia A; Sinceri S; Ferrari V; Ferrari M; Mosca F; Morelli L
Updates Surg; 2018 Sep; 70(3):401-405. PubMed ID: 29987767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Generation of variable anatomical models for surgical training simulators.
Sierra R; Zsemlye G; Székely G; Bajka M
Med Image Anal; 2006 Apr; 10(2):275-85. PubMed ID: 16388975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. [The foundations of computer assisted surgery].
Langlotz F; Nolte LP; Tannast M
Orthopade; 2006 Oct; 35(10):1032-7. PubMed ID: 16924446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. New technologies applied to surgical processes: Virtual Reality and rapid prototyping.
Suárez-Mejías C; Gomez-Ciriza G; Valverde I; Parra Calderón C; Gómez-Cía T
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 210():669-71. PubMed ID: 25991234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
