These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17120944)

  • 1. The hazards of using administrative data to measure surgical quality.
    Fry DE; Pine MB; Jordan HS; Hoaglin DC; Jones B; Meimban R
    Am Surg; 2006 Nov; 72(11):1031-7; discussion 1061-9, 1133-48. PubMed ID: 17120944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Combining administrative and clinical data to stratify surgical risk.
    Fry DE; Pine M; Jordan HS; Elixhauser A; Hoaglin DC; Jones B; Warner D; Meimban R
    Ann Surg; 2007 Nov; 246(5):875-85. PubMed ID: 17968182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modifying ICD-9-CM coding of secondary diagnoses to improve risk-adjustment of inpatient mortality rates.
    Pine M; Jordan HS; Elixhauser A; Fry DE; Hoaglin DC; Jones B; Meimban R; Warner D; Gonzales J
    Med Decis Making; 2009; 29(1):69-81. PubMed ID: 18812585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of the present-on-admission indicator on hospital quality measurement: experience with the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Inpatient Quality Indicators.
    Glance LG; Osler TM; Mukamel DB; Dick AW
    Med Care; 2008 Feb; 46(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 18219238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Should we add clinical variables to administrative data?: The case of risk-adjusted case fatality rates after admission for acute myocardial infarction.
    Johnston TC; Coory MD; Scott I; Duckett S
    Med Care; 2007 Dec; 45(12):1180-5. PubMed ID: 18007168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enhancement of claims data to improve risk adjustment of hospital mortality.
    Pine M; Jordan HS; Elixhauser A; Fry DE; Hoaglin DC; Jones B; Meimban R; Warner D; Gonzales J
    JAMA; 2007 Jan; 297(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 17200477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of mortality risk adjustment using a clinical data algorithm (American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program) and an administrative data algorithm (Solucient) at the case level within a single institution.
    Hall BL; Hirbe M; Waterman B; Boslaugh S; Dunagan WC
    J Am Coll Surg; 2007 Dec; 205(6):767-77. PubMed ID: 18035260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of risk-adjustment models using administrative or clinical data for outcome prediction in patients after myocardial infarction or coronary bypass surgery in Korea.
    Park HK; Yoon SJ; Ahn HS; Ahn LS; Seo HJ; Lee SI; Lee KS
    Int J Clin Pract; 2007 Jul; 61(7):1086-90. PubMed ID: 17537190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using automated clinical data for risk adjustment: development and validation of six disease-specific mortality predictive models for pay-for-performance.
    Tabak YP; Johannes RS; Silber JH
    Med Care; 2007 Aug; 45(8):789-805. PubMed ID: 17667314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An administrative claims model suitable for profiling hospital performance based on 30-day mortality rates among patients with an acute myocardial infarction.
    Krumholz HM; Wang Y; Mattera JA; Wang Y; Han LF; Ingber MJ; Roman S; Normand SL
    Circulation; 2006 Apr; 113(13):1683-92. PubMed ID: 16549637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adjusted or unadjusted outcomes.
    Fink AS
    Am J Surg; 2009 Nov; 198(5 Suppl):S28-35. PubMed ID: 19874931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Veterans Affairs intensive care unit risk adjustment model: validation, updating, recalibration.
    Render ML; Deddens J; Freyberg R; Almenoff P; Connors AF; Wagner D; Hofer TP
    Crit Care Med; 2008 Apr; 36(4):1031-42. PubMed ID: 18379226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of risk adjustment methodologies in surgical quality improvement.
    Steinberg SM; Popa MR; Michalek JA; Bethel MJ; Ellison EC
    Surgery; 2008 Oct; 144(4):662-7; discussion 662-7. PubMed ID: 18847652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Risk-adjusting hospital inpatient mortality using automated inpatient, outpatient, and laboratory databases.
    Escobar GJ; Greene JD; Scheirer P; Gardner MN; Draper D; Kipnis P
    Med Care; 2008 Mar; 46(3):232-9. PubMed ID: 18388836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An administrative claims model suitable for profiling hospital performance based on 30-day mortality rates among patients with heart failure.
    Krumholz HM; Wang Y; Mattera JA; Wang Y; Han LF; Ingber MJ; Roman S; Normand SL
    Circulation; 2006 Apr; 113(13):1693-701. PubMed ID: 16549636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Successful implementation of the Department of Veterans Affairs' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in the private sector: the Patient Safety in Surgery study.
    Khuri SF; Henderson WG; Daley J; Jonasson O; Jones RS; Campbell DA; Fink AS; Mentzer RM; Neumayer L; Hammermeister K; Mosca C; Healey N;
    Ann Surg; 2008 Aug; 248(2):329-36. PubMed ID: 18650645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing contemporary intensive care unit outcome: an updated Mortality Probability Admission Model (MPM0-III).
    Higgins TL; Teres D; Copes WS; Nathanson BH; Stark M; Kramer AA
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Mar; 35(3):827-35. PubMed ID: 17255863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the agency for healthcare research and quality pediatric quality indicators.
    Scanlon MC; Harris JM; Levy F; Sedman A
    Pediatrics; 2008 Jun; 121(6):e1723-31. PubMed ID: 18474532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stroke: the Elixhauser Index for comorbidity adjustment of in-hospital case fatality.
    Zhu H; Hill MD
    Neurology; 2008 Jul; 71(4):283-7. PubMed ID: 18645167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing surgical quality using administrative and clinical data sets: a direct comparison of the University HealthSystem Consortium Clinical Database and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data set.
    Davenport DL; Holsapple CW; Conigliaro J
    Am J Med Qual; 2009; 24(5):395-402. PubMed ID: 19584374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.