269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17121127)
21. Monitoring of intraoperative motor evoked potentials to increase the safety of surgery in and around the motor cortex.
Kombos T; Suess O; Ciklatekerlio O; Brock M
J Neurosurg; 2001 Oct; 95(4):608-14. PubMed ID: 11596955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Methodology for intra-operative recording of the corticobulbar motor evoked potentials from cricothyroid muscles.
Deletis V; Fernández-Conejero I; Ulkatan S; Rogić M; Carbó EL; Hiltzik D
Clin Neurophysiol; 2011 Sep; 122(9):1883-9. PubMed ID: 21440494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Transcranial motor evoked potential monitoring during the surgical clipping of unruptured intracranial aneurysms.
Yeon JY; Seo DW; Hong SC; Kim JS
J Neurol Sci; 2010 Jun; 293(1-2):29-34. PubMed ID: 20409559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Monitoring of motor evoked potentials compared with somatosensory evoked potentials and microvascular Doppler ultrasonography in cerebral aneurysm surgery.
Neuloh G; Schramm J
J Neurosurg; 2004 Mar; 100(3):389-99. PubMed ID: 15035273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Transcranial electrical stimulation as predictor of elicitation of intraoperative muscle-evoked potentials.
Fukuoka Y; Komori H; Kawabata S; Ohkubo H; Mochida K; Shinomiya K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Oct; 29(19):2153-7. PubMed ID: 15454708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Motor evoked potential monitoring during surgery of middle cerebral artery aneurysms: a cohort study.
Yue Q; Zhu W; Gu Y; Xu B; Lang L; Song J; Cai J; Xu G; Chen L; Mao Y
World Neurosurg; 2014 Dec; 82(6):1091-9. PubMed ID: 25220340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Ischemia changes and tolerance ratio of evoked potential monitoring in intracranial aneurysm surgery.
Kang D; Yao P; Wu Z; Yu L
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2013 May; 115(5):552-6. PubMed ID: 22795547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Neurophysiological criteria for intraoperative prediction of pure motor hemiplegia during aneurysm surgery. Case report.
Szelényi A; Bueno de Camargo A; Flamm E; Deletis V
J Neurosurg; 2003 Sep; 99(3):575-8. PubMed ID: 12959448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The value of intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring during surgical intervention for thoracic idiopathic spinal cord herniation.
Novak K; Widhalm G; de Camargo AB; Perin N; Jallo G; Knosp E; Deletis V
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Feb; 16(2):114-26. PubMed ID: 22117142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Usefulness of motor-evoked potential monitoring during coil embolization of anterior choroidal artery aneurysms: technical reports.
Hiraishi T; Fukuda M; Oishi M; Nishino K; Shinbo J; Sorimachi T; Ito Y; Fujii Y
Neurol Res; 2011 May; 33(4):360-2. PubMed ID: 21535934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The use of motor evoked potential monitoring during cerebral aneurysm surgery to predict pure motor deficits due to subcortical ischemia.
Guo L; Gelb AW
Clin Neurophysiol; 2011 Apr; 122(4):648-55. PubMed ID: 20869304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Combined monitoring of evoked potentials during microsurgery for lesions adjacent to the brainstem and intracranial aneurysms.
Kang DZ; Wu ZY; Lan Q; Yu LH; Lin ZY; Wang CY; Lin YX
Chin Med J (Engl); 2007 Sep; 120(18):1567-73. PubMed ID: 17908471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Monitoring of Motor and Somatosensory Evoked Potentials During Spine Surgery: Intraoperative Changes and Postoperative Outcomes.
Chang SH; Park YG; Kim DH; Yoon SY
Ann Rehabil Med; 2016 Jun; 40(3):470-80. PubMed ID: 27446784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Ipsilateral responses of motor evoked potential correlated with the motor functional outcomes after cortical resection.
Sun W; Fu W; Wang D; Wang Y
Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Sep; 73(3):377-82. PubMed ID: 19559057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effectiveness and Limitations of Intraoperative Monitoring with Combined Motor and Somatosensory Evoked Potentials During Surgical Clipping of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms.
Choi HH; Ha EJ; Cho WS; Kang HS; Kim JE
World Neurosurg; 2017 Dec; 108():738-747. PubMed ID: 28951267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of reliability of post-tetanic motor-evoked potential monitoring during spinal surgery under general anesthesia.
Hayashi H; Kawaguchi M; Yamamoto Y; Inoue S; Koizumi M; Ueda Y; Takakura Y; Furuya H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Dec; 33(26):E994-E1000. PubMed ID: 19092611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The warning-sign hierarchy between quantitative subcortical motor mapping and continuous motor evoked potential monitoring during resection of supratentorial brain tumors.
Seidel K; Beck J; Stieglitz L; Schucht P; Raabe A
J Neurosurg; 2013 Feb; 118(2):287-96. PubMed ID: 23198802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The incidence of unacceptable movement with motor evoked potentials during craniotomy for aneurysm clipping.
Hemmer LB; Zeeni C; Bebawy JF; Bendok BR; Cotton MA; Shah NB; Gupta DK; Koht A
World Neurosurg; 2014 Jan; 81(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 23043993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Conjunct SEP and MEP monitoring in resection of infratentorial lesions: lessons learned in a cohort of 210 patients.
Kodama K; Javadi M; Seifert V; Szelényi A
J Neurosurg; 2014 Dec; 121(6):1453-61. PubMed ID: 25216065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Optimum interpulse interval for transcranial electrical train stimulation to elicit motor evoked potentials of maximal amplitude in both upper and lower extremity target muscles.
van Hal C; Hoebink E; Polak HE; Racz I; de Kleuver M; Journee HL
Clin Neurophysiol; 2013 Oct; 124(10):2054-9. PubMed ID: 23735307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
