These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1712282)

  • 1. Right hemisphere dominance of different mismatch negativities.
    Paavilainen P; Alho K; Reinikainen K; Sams M; Näätänen R
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1991 Jun; 78(6):466-79. PubMed ID: 1712282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attention and mismatch negativity.
    Näätänen R; Paavilainen P; Tiitinen H; Jiang D; Alho K
    Psychophysiology; 1993 Sep; 30(5):436-50. PubMed ID: 8416070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The mismatch negativity and the P3a components of the auditory event-related potentials in autistic low-functioning subjects.
    Ferri R; Elia M; Agarwal N; Lanuzza B; Musumeci SA; Pennisi G
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2003 Sep; 114(9):1671-80. PubMed ID: 12948796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automatic auditory processing of english words as indexed by the mismatch negativity, using a multiple deviant paradigm.
    Pettigrew CM; Murdoch BE; Ponton CW; Finnigan S; Alku P; Kei J; Sockalingam R; Chenery HJ
    Ear Hear; 2004 Jun; 25(3):284-301. PubMed ID: 15179119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differences in evoked potentials during the active processing of sound location and motion.
    Richter N; Schröger E; Rübsamen R
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jun; 51(7):1204-14. PubMed ID: 23499852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do event-related potentials to infrequent decrements in duration of auditory stimuli demonstrate a memory trace in man?
    Näätänen R; Paavilainen P; Reinikainen K
    Neurosci Lett; 1989 Dec; 107(1-3):347-52. PubMed ID: 2616046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Processing of auditory stimuli during auditory and visual attention as revealed by event-related potentials.
    Alho K; Woods DL; Algazi A
    Psychophysiology; 1994 Sep; 31(5):469-79. PubMed ID: 7972601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mismatch negativity to slight pitch changes outside strong attentional focus.
    Paavilainen P; Tiitinen H; Alho K; Näätänen R
    Biol Psychol; 1993 Oct; 37(1):23-41. PubMed ID: 8110919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intermodal selective attention. I. Effects on event-related potentials to lateralized auditory and visual stimuli.
    Woods DL; Alho K; Algazi A
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1992 May; 82(5):341-55. PubMed ID: 1374703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory frequency discrimination and event-related potentials.
    Sams M; Paavilainen P; Alho K; Näätänen R
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1985 Nov; 62(6):437-48. PubMed ID: 2415340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hemispheric asymmetry of ERPs and MMNs evoked by slow, fast and abrupt auditory motion.
    Shestopalova LB; Petropavlovskaia EA; Vaitulevich SP; Nikitin NI
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Oct; 91():465-479. PubMed ID: 27641235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interstimulus interval and auditory event-related potentials in children: evidence for multiple generators.
    Ceponiene R; Cheour M; Näätänen R
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1998 Jul; 108(4):345-54. PubMed ID: 9714376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Right hemispheric dominancy in the auditory evoked magnetic fields for pure-tone stimuli].
    Kanno A; Nakasato N; Fujiwara S; Yoshimoto T
    No To Shinkei; 1996 Mar; 48(3):240-4. PubMed ID: 8868334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. ERPs for infrequent omissions and inclusions of stimulus elements.
    Nordby H; Hammerborg D; Roth WT; Hugdahl K
    Psychophysiology; 1994 Nov; 31(6):544-52. PubMed ID: 7846215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An electrophysiological and behavioral investigation of involuntary attention towards auditory frequency, duration and intensity changes.
    Escera C; Corral MJ; Yago E
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2002 Nov; 14(3):325-32. PubMed ID: 12421656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The processing of sound duration after left hemisphere stroke: event-related potential and behavioral evidence.
    Ilvonen TM; Kujala T; Tervaniemi M; Salonen O; Näätänen R; Pekkonen E
    Psychophysiology; 2001 Jul; 38(4):622-8. PubMed ID: 11446575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mismatch negativity to change in spatial location of an auditory stimulus.
    Paavilainen P; Karlsson ML; Reinikainen K; Näätänen R
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1989 Aug; 73(2):129-41. PubMed ID: 2473880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Brain generators implicated in the processing of auditory stimulus deviance: a topographic event-related potential study.
    Giard MH; Perrin F; Pernier J; Bouchet P
    Psychophysiology; 1990 Nov; 27(6):627-40. PubMed ID: 2100348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.