These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17122925)

  • 1. Surface morphology and adsorbed proteins affect phagocyte responses to nano-porous alumina.
    Karlsson M; Tang L
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2006 Nov; 17(11):1101-11. PubMed ID: 17122925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of the nanostructure of porous alumina on growth behavior of MG63 osteoblast-like cells.
    Song Y; Ju Y; Morita Y; Song G
    J Biosci Bioeng; 2013 Oct; 116(4):509-15. PubMed ID: 23643619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nanoporous aluminum oxide affects neutrophil behaviour.
    Karlsson M; Johansson A; Tang L; Boman M
    Microsc Res Tech; 2004 Apr; 63(5):259-65. PubMed ID: 15170755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Initial in vitro interaction of osteoblasts with nano-porous alumina.
    Karlsson M; Pålsgård E; Wilshaw PR; Di Silvio L
    Biomaterials; 2003 Aug; 24(18):3039-46. PubMed ID: 12895576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nanoporous Aluminum Oxide Membranes Coated with Atomic Layer Deposition-Grown Titanium Dioxide for Biomedical Applications: An In Vitro Evaluation.
    Petrochenko PE; Kumar G; Fu W; Zhang Q; Zheng J; Liang C; Goering PL; Narayan RJ
    J Biomed Nanotechnol; 2015 Dec; 11(12):2275-85. PubMed ID: 26510320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nanoporesize affects complement activation.
    Ferraz N; Nilsson B; Hong J; Karlsson Ott M
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2008 Dec; 87(3):575-81. PubMed ID: 18186072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peptide-immobilized nanoporous alumina membranes for enhanced osteoblast adhesion.
    Swan EE; Popat KC; Desai TA
    Biomaterials; 2005 May; 26(14):1969-76. PubMed ID: 15576171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Self-supporting nanoporous alumina membranes as substrates for hepatic cell cultures.
    Hoess A; Thormann A; Friedmann A; Heilmann A
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2012 Sep; 100(9):2230-8. PubMed ID: 22492687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A novel nano-porous alumina biomaterial with potential for loading with bioactive materials.
    Walpole AR; Xia Z; Wilson CW; Triffitt JT; Wilshaw PR
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2009 Jul; 90(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 18481790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Morphological zeta-potential variation of nanoporous anodic alumina layers and cell adherence.
    Pedimonte BJ; Moest T; Luxbacher T; von Wilmowsky C; Fey T; Schlegel KA; Greil P
    Acta Biomater; 2014 Feb; 10(2):968-74. PubMed ID: 24080316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of gamma-alumina and hydroxyapatite coatings on the growth and metabolism of human osteoblasts.
    Labat B; Chamson A; Frey J
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1995 Nov; 29(11):1397-401. PubMed ID: 8582908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Histamine release and fibrinogen adsorption mediate acute inflammatory responses to biomaterial implants in humans.
    Zdolsek J; Eaton JW; Tang L
    J Transl Med; 2007 Jul; 5():31. PubMed ID: 17603911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of fibronectin adsorption on osteoblastic cellular responses to hydroxyapatite and alumina.
    Kawashita M; Hasegawa M; Kudo TA; Kanetaka H; Miyazaki T; Hashimoto M
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2016 Dec; 69():1268-72. PubMed ID: 27612826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tuning the response of osteoblast-like cells to the porous-alumina-assisted mixed-oxide nano-mound arrays.
    Fohlerova Z; Mozalev A
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2018 Jul; 106(5):1645-1654. PubMed ID: 28837748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reduced oxidative stress in primary human cells by antioxidant released from nanoporous alumina.
    Pujari-Palmer S; Pujari-Palmer M; Karlsson Ott M
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2016 Apr; 104(3):568-75. PubMed ID: 25952986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neuronal cell biocompatibility and adhesion to modified CMOS electrodes.
    Graham AH; Bowen CR; Taylor J; Robbins J
    Biomed Microdevices; 2009 Oct; 11(5):1091-1101. PubMed ID: 19459049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro and in vivo evaluations of 3D porous TCP-coated and non-coated alumina scaffolds.
    Kim YH; Anirban JM; Song HY; Seo HS; Lee BT
    J Biomater Appl; 2011 Feb; 25(6):539-58. PubMed ID: 20207781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Porous alumina, zirconia and alumina/zirconia for bone repair: fabrication, mechanical and in vitro biological response.
    Hadjicharalambous C; Buyakov A; Buyakova S; Kulkov S; Chatzinikolaidou M
    Biomed Mater; 2015 Apr; 10(2):025012. PubMed ID: 25904146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MgF2-coated porous magnesium/alumina scaffolds with improved strength, corrosion resistance, and biological performance for biomedical applications.
    Kang MH; Jang TS; Kim SW; Park HS; Song J; Kim HE; Jung KH; Jung HD
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2016 May; 62():634-42. PubMed ID: 26952467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Alumina particles influence the interactions of cocultured osteoblasts and macrophages.
    Rodrigo A; Vallés G; Saldaña L; Rodríguez M; Martínez ME; Munuera L; Vilaboa N
    J Orthop Res; 2006 Jan; 24(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 16419968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.