These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17122997)

  • 1. Initial screening of contaminated land: a comparison of US and Swedish methods.
    Bergius K; Oberg T
    Environ Manage; 2007 Feb; 39(2):226-34. PubMed ID: 17122997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Regional risk assessment for contaminated sites part 2: ranking of potentially contaminated sites.
    Pizzol L; Critto A; Agostini P; Marcomini A
    Environ Int; 2011 Nov; 37(8):1307-20. PubMed ID: 21704374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Beyond contaminated land assessment: on costs and benefits of bioaccessibility prediction.
    Latawiec AE; Reid BJ
    Environ Int; 2009 Aug; 35(6):911-9. PubMed ID: 19403173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of multi-criteria analysis methodologies for the prioritization of arsenic-contaminated sites in the southwest of China.
    Chen R; Xiong Y; Li J; Teng Y; Chen H; Yang J
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Apr; 26(12):11781-11792. PubMed ID: 30815813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
    Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the accuracy and consistency of the Swedish environmental classification and information system for pharmaceuticals.
    Agerstrand M; Rudén C
    Sci Total Environ; 2010 May; 408(11):2327-39. PubMed ID: 20206966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Numerical simulation and application of electrical resistivity survey in heavy metal contaminated sites].
    Wang YL; Nai CX; Wang YW; Dong L
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2013 May; 34(5):1908-14. PubMed ID: 23914547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The environmental specimen bank, Swedish Museum of Natural History-a base for contaminant monitoring and environmental research.
    Odsjö T
    J Environ Monit; 2006 Aug; 8(8):791-4. PubMed ID: 16896461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A methodology for estimating risks associated with landslides of contaminated soil into rivers.
    Göransson G; Norrman J; Larson M; Alén C; Rosén L
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Feb; 472():481-95. PubMed ID: 24300459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lead exposure and poisoning of songbirds using the Coeur d'Alene River Basin, Idaho, USA.
    Hansen JA; Audet D; Spears BL; Healy KA; Brazzle RE; Hoffman DJ; Dailey A; Beyer WN
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2011 Oct; 7(4):587-95. PubMed ID: 21538831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Why and how to combine evidence in environmental assessments: weighing evidence and building cases.
    Suter GW; Cormier SM
    Sci Total Environ; 2011 Mar; 409(8):1406-17. PubMed ID: 21277006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does remediation save lives? - on the cost of cleaning up arsenic-contaminated sites in Sweden.
    Forslund J; Samakovlis E; Johansson MV; Barregard L
    Sci Total Environ; 2010 Jul; 408(16):3085-91. PubMed ID: 20439110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk classification of contaminated sites - Comparison of the Swedish and the German method.
    Wanner P; Freis M; Peternell M; Kelm V
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Feb; 327():116825. PubMed ID: 36460555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Human biomonitoring: state of the art.
    Angerer J; Ewers U; Wilhelm M
    Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2007 May; 210(3-4):201-28. PubMed ID: 17376741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The "CHILD" framework for the study of artisanal mercury mining communities.
    Van Brussel E; Carrizales L; Flores-Ramirez R; Camacho A; Leon-Arce M; Diaz-Barriga F
    Rev Environ Health; 2016 Mar; 31(1):43-5. PubMed ID: 26953702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A novel method for reducing the number of agents to be studied in an occupational epidemiologic study.
    Pierce JS; Esmen NA
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2011 Apr; 8(4):236-48. PubMed ID: 21416442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of the congestion charging scheme on air quality in London. Part 1. Emissions modeling and analysis of air pollution measurements.
    Kelly F; Anderson HR; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Barratt B; Beevers S; Derwent D; Green D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Apr; (155):5-71. PubMed ID: 21830496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Polychlorinated biphenyls in polysulfide sealants--occurrence and emission from a landfill station.
    Persson NJ; Pettersen H; Ishaq R; Axelman J; Bandh C; Broman D; Zebühr Y; Hammar T
    Environ Pollut; 2005 Nov; 138(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 15899540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using landscape ecology to focus ecological risk assessment and guide risk management decision-making.
    Kapustka LA; Galbraith H; Luxon BM; Yocum J
    Toxicol Ind Health; 2001 Jun; 17(5-10):236-46. PubMed ID: 12539868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efficient methods for large-area surface sampling of sites contaminated with pathogenic microorganisms and other hazardous agents: current state, needs, and perspectives.
    Edmonds JM
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2009 Oct; 84(5):811-6. PubMed ID: 19644689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.