These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17123159)

  • 1. The effect of lineup member similarity on recognition accuracy in simultaneous and sequential lineups.
    Flowe HD; Ebbesen EB
    Law Hum Behav; 2007 Feb; 31(1):33-52. PubMed ID: 17123159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Children's identification of faces from lineups: the effects of lineup presentation and instructions on accuracy.
    Beresford J; Blades M
    J Appl Psychol; 2006 Sep; 91(5):1102-13. PubMed ID: 16953771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Confidence-accuracy calibration in absolute and relative face recognition judgments.
    Weber N; Brewer N
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2004 Sep; 10(3):156-72. PubMed ID: 15462618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The target-to-foils shift in simultaneous and sequential lineups.
    Clark SE; Davey SL
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Apr; 29(2):151-72. PubMed ID: 15912721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Eyewitness confidence in simultaneous and sequential lineups: a criterion shift account for sequential mistaken identification overconfidence.
    Dobolyi DG; Dodson CS
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2013 Dec; 19(4):345-57. PubMed ID: 24188335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of eyewitness identifications from simultaneous and sequential lineups.
    Wright DB
    Memory; 2007 Oct; 15(7):746-54. PubMed ID: 17852725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Creating fair lineups for suspects with distinctive features.
    Zarkadi T; Wade KA; Stewart N
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Dec; 20(12):1448-53. PubMed ID: 19883492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Configural and component processing in simultaneous and sequential lineup procedures.
    Flowe HD; Smith HM; Karoğlu N; Onwuegbusi TO; Rai L
    Memory; 2016; 24(3):306-14. PubMed ID: 25665039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. PC_Eyewitness and the sequential superiority effect: computer-based lineup administration.
    MacLin OH; Zimmerman LA; Malpass RS
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Jun; 29(3):303-21. PubMed ID: 15965630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What we know now: the Evanston Illinois field lineups.
    Steblay NK
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Feb; 35(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 20177754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multiple confidence estimates as indices of eyewitness memory.
    Sauer JD; Brewer N; Weber N
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Aug; 137(3):528-47. PubMed ID: 18729714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multiple independent identification decisions: a method of calibrating eyewitness identifications.
    Pryke S; Lindsay RC; Dysart JE; Dupuis P
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Feb; 89(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 14769121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sequential lineup laps and eyewitness accuracy.
    Steblay NK; Dietrich HL; Ryan SL; Raczynski JL; James KA
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Aug; 35(4):262-74. PubMed ID: 20632113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A re-examination of the effects of biased lineup instructions in eyewitness identification.
    Clark SE
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Oct; 29(5):575-604. PubMed ID: 16254744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lineup administrator influences on eyewitness identification decisions.
    Clark SE; Marshall TE; Rosenthal R
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Mar; 15(1):63-75. PubMed ID: 19309217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biased lineups: sequential presentation reduces the problem.
    Lindsay RC; Lea JA; Nosworthy GJ; Fulford JA; Hector J; LeVan V; Seabrook C
    J Appl Psychol; 1991 Dec; 76(6):796-802. PubMed ID: 1774217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Eyewitness accuracy rates in police showup and lineup presentations: a meta-analytic comparison.
    Steblay N; Dysart J; Fulero S; Lindsay RC
    Law Hum Behav; 2003 Oct; 27(5):523-40. PubMed ID: 14593796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Eyewitness lineups: is the appearance-change instruction a good idea?
    Charman SD; Wells GL
    Law Hum Behav; 2007 Feb; 31(1):3-22. PubMed ID: 16612580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Verbalizing facial memory: criterion effects in verbal overshadowing.
    Clare J; Lewandowsky S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Jul; 30(4):739-55. PubMed ID: 15238020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Enhancing lineup identification accuracy: two codes are better than one.
    Melara RD; DeWitt-Rickards TS; O'Brien TP
    J Appl Psychol; 1989 Oct; 74(5):706-13. PubMed ID: 2793771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.