These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17124762)
1. Two facets of peer review and the proper role of study sections. Lenard J Account Res; 2006; 13(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 17124762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Grants, politics, and the NIH. Drazen JM; Ingelfinger JR N Engl J Med; 2003 Dec; 349(23):2259-61. PubMed ID: 14657434 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. NIH needs a makeover. Dey SK Science; 2009 Aug; 325(5943):944. PubMed ID: 19696331 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. National Institutes of Health. Changes in peer review target young scientists, heavyweights. Kaiser J Science; 2008 Jun; 320(5882):1404. PubMed ID: 18556519 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. National Institutes of Health. Two strikes and you're out, grant applicants learn. Kaiser J Science; 2008 Oct; 322(5900):358. PubMed ID: 18927363 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. National Institutes of Health. Zerhouni's parting message: make room for young scientists. Kaiser J Science; 2008 Nov; 322(5903):834-5. PubMed ID: 18988813 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A curbstone consult to applicants for National Institute of Mental Health grant support. Rush AJ; Gullion CM; Prien RF Psychopharmacol Bull; 1996; 32(3):311-20. PubMed ID: 8961773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Research funding. Politics and funding in the U.S. public biomedical R&D system. Hegde D; Mowery DC Science; 2008 Dec; 322(5909):1797-8. PubMed ID: 19095928 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. On incentives for innovation. Alberts B Science; 2009 Nov; 326(5957):1163. PubMed ID: 19965437 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Biodefense. U.S. agencies unveil plan for biosecurity peer review. Couzin J Science; 2004 Mar; 303(5664):1595. PubMed ID: 15016970 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]