3039 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17126066)
1. Strategy for genotoxicity testing: hazard identification and risk assessment in relation to in vitro testing.
Thybaud V; Aardema M; Clements J; Dearfield K; Galloway S; Hayashi M; Jacobson-Kram D; Kirkland D; MacGregor JT; Marzin D; Ohyama W; Schuler M; Suzuki H; Zeiger E;
Mutat Res; 2007 Feb; 627(1):41-58. PubMed ID: 17126066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Strategy for genotoxicity testing--metabolic considerations.
Ku WW; Bigger A; Brambilla G; Glatt H; Gocke E; Guzzie PJ; Hakura A; Honma M; Martus HJ; Obach RS; Roberts S;
Mutat Res; 2007 Feb; 627(1):59-77. PubMed ID: 17141553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity.
Kirkland D; Aardema M; Henderson L; Müller L
Mutat Res; 2005 Jul; 584(1-2):1-256. PubMed ID: 15979392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Follow-up testing of rodent carcinogens not positive in the standard genotoxicity testing battery: IWGT workgroup report.
Kasper P; Uno Y; Mauthe R; Asano N; Douglas G; Matthews E; Moore M; Mueller L; Nakajima M; Singer T; Speit G;
Mutat Res; 2007 Feb; 627(1):106-16. PubMed ID: 17123861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Testing strategies in mutagenicity and genetic toxicology: an appraisal of the guidelines of the European Scientific Committee for Cosmetics and Non-Food Products for the evaluation of hair dyes.
Kirkland DJ; Henderson L; Marzin D; Müller L; Parry JM; Speit G; Tweats DJ; Williams GM
Mutat Res; 2005 Dec; 588(2):88-105. PubMed ID: 16326131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro approaches to develop weight of evidence (WoE) and mode of action (MoA) discussions with positive in vitro genotoxicity results.
Kirkland DJ; Aardema M; Banduhn N; Carmichael P; Fautz R; Meunier JR; Pfuhler S
Mutagenesis; 2007 May; 22(3):161-75. PubMed ID: 17369606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Follow-up actions from positive results of in vitro genetic toxicity testing.
Dearfield KL; Thybaud V; Cimino MC; Custer L; Czich A; Harvey JS; Hester S; Kim JH; Kirkland D; Levy DD; Lorge E; Moore MM; Ouédraogo-Arras G; Schuler M; Suter W; Sweder K; Tarlo K; van Benthem J; van Goethem F; Witt KL
Environ Mol Mutagen; 2011 Apr; 52(3):177-204. PubMed ID: 20963811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How to assess the mutagenic potential of cosmetic products without animal tests?
Speit G
Mutat Res; 2009 Aug; 678(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 19379833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vivo rodent erythrocyte micronucleus assay. II. Some aspects of protocol design including repeated treatments, integration with toxicity testing, and automated scoring.
Hayashi M; MacGregor JT; Gatehouse DG; Adler ID; Blakey DH; Dertinger SD; Krishna G; Morita T; Russo A; Sutou S
Environ Mol Mutagen; 2000; 35(3):234-52. PubMed ID: 10737958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Final report on the safety assessment of capsicum annuum extract, capsicum annuum fruit extract, capsicum annuum resin, capsicum annuum fruit powder, capsicum frutescens fruit, capsicum frutescens fruit extract, capsicum frutescens resin, and capsaicin.
Int J Toxicol; 2007; 26 Suppl 1():3-106. PubMed ID: 17365137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improvement of in vivo genotoxicity assessment: combination of acute tests and integration into standard toxicity testing.
Rothfuss A; Honma M; Czich A; Aardema MJ; Burlinson B; Galloway S; Hamada S; Kirkland D; Heflich RH; Howe J; Nakajima M; O'Donovan M; Plappert-Helbig U; Priestley C; Recio L; Schuler M; Uno Y; Martus HJ
Mutat Res; 2011 Aug; 723(2):108-20. PubMed ID: 21182982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens II. Further analysis of mammalian cell results, relative predictivity and tumour profiles.
Kirkland D; Aardema M; Müller L; Makoto H
Mutat Res; 2006 Sep; 608(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 16769241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Carcinogenicity categorization of chemicals-new aspects to be considered in a European perspective.
Bolt HM; Foth H; Hengstler JG; Degen GH
Toxicol Lett; 2004 Jun; 151(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 15177638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Genetic toxicity assessment: employing the best science for human safety evaluation Part VII: Why not start with a single test: a transformational alternative to genotoxicity hazard and risk assessment.
Ku WW; Aubrecht J; Mauthe RJ; Schiestl RH; Fornace AJ
Toxicol Sci; 2007 Sep; 99(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 17548889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rationale of genotoxicity testing of nanomaterials: regulatory requirements and appropriateness of available OECD test guidelines.
Warheit DB; Donner EM
Nanotoxicology; 2010 Dec; 4():409-13. PubMed ID: 20925448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vivo erythrocyte micronucleus assay III. Validation and regulatory acceptance of automated scoring and the use of rat peripheral blood reticulocytes, with discussion of non-hematopoietic target cells and a single dose-level limit test.
Hayashi M; MacGregor JT; Gatehouse DG; Blakey DH; Dertinger SD; Abramsson-Zetterberg L; Krishna G; Morita T; Russo A; Asano N; Suzuki H; Ohyama W; Gibson D;
Mutat Res; 2007 Feb; 627(1):10-30. PubMed ID: 17157053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Next generation testing strategy for assessment of genomic damage: A conceptual framework and considerations.
Dearfield KL; Gollapudi BB; Bemis JC; Benz RD; Douglas GR; Elespuru RK; Johnson GE; Kirkland DJ; LeBaron MJ; Li AP; Marchetti F; Pottenger LH; Rorije E; Tanir JY; Thybaud V; van Benthem J; Yauk CL; Zeiger E; Luijten M
Environ Mol Mutagen; 2017 Jun; 58(5):264-283. PubMed ID: 27650663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative overview of current international strategies and guidelines for genetic toxicology testing for regulatory purposes.
Cimino MC
Environ Mol Mutagen; 2006 Jun; 47(5):362-90. PubMed ID: 16649190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ethyl methanesulfonate toxicity in Viracept--a comprehensive human risk assessment based on threshold data for genotoxicity.
Müller L; Gocke E; Lavé T; Pfister T
Toxicol Lett; 2009 Nov; 190(3):317-29. PubMed ID: 19443141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
