These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

57 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17126941)

  • 1. Kinematic analysis of multiple constraints on a pointing task.
    Thompson SG; McConnell DS; Slocum JS; Bohan M
    Hum Mov Sci; 2007 Feb; 26(1):11-26. PubMed ID: 17126941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Motor planning of arm movements is direction-dependent in the gravity field.
    Gentili R; Cahouet V; Papaxanthis C
    Neuroscience; 2007 Mar; 145(1):20-32. PubMed ID: 17224242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of objectives and constraints on motor control strategy in reciprocal aiming movements.
    Adam JJ
    J Mot Behav; 1992 Jun; 24(2):173-85. PubMed ID: 14977617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Linear and logarithmic speed-accuracy trade-offs in reciprocal aiming result from task-specific parameterization of an invariant underlying dynamics.
    Bongers RM; Fernandez L; Bootsma RJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1443-57. PubMed ID: 19803648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gender-specific movement strategies using a computer-pointing task.
    Rohr LE
    J Mot Behav; 2006 Nov; 38(6):431-7. PubMed ID: 17138527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Transformation of kinematic characteristics of a precise movement after change in a spatial task].
    Vasil'eva ON
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 2006; 56(5):618-28. PubMed ID: 17147203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimal integration of gravity in trajectory planning of vertical pointing movements.
    Crevecoeur F; Thonnard JL; Lefèvre P
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Aug; 102(2):786-96. PubMed ID: 19458149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of computer mouse gain and visual demand on mouse clicking performance and muscle activation in a young and elderly group of experienced computer users.
    Sandfeld J; Jensen BR
    Appl Ergon; 2005 Sep; 36(5):547-55. PubMed ID: 15950168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Non-linear gaining in precision aiming: making Fitts' task a bit easier.
    Fernandez L; Bootsma RJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Oct; 129(2):217-27. PubMed ID: 18632086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bi-phasic hitting with constraints on impact velocity and temporal precision.
    Caljouw SR; van der Kamp J; Savelsbergh GJ
    Hum Mov Sci; 2005 Apr; 24(2):206-17. PubMed ID: 15964647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interaction torque contributes to planar reaching at slow speed.
    Yamasaki H; Tagami Y; Fujisawa H; Hoshi F; Nagasaki H
    Biomed Eng Online; 2008 Oct; 7():27. PubMed ID: 18940016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reference frame conversions for repeated arm movements.
    Sorrento GU; Henriques DY
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Jun; 99(6):2968-84. PubMed ID: 18400956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reproducibility and minimal detectable change of three-dimensional kinematic analysis of reaching tasks in people with hemiparesis after stroke.
    Wagner JM; Rhodes JA; Patten C
    Phys Ther; 2008 May; 88(5):652-63. PubMed ID: 18326055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Decline in motor prediction in elderly subjects: right versus left arm differences in mentally simulated motor actions.
    Skoura X; Personnier P; Vinter A; Pozzo T; Papaxanthis C
    Cortex; 2008 Oct; 44(9):1271-8. PubMed ID: 18761141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of task constraints on reaching kinematics by healthy adults.
    Wu CY; Lin KC; Lin KH; Chang CW; Chen CL
    Percept Mot Skills; 2005 Jun; 100(3 Pt 2):983-94. PubMed ID: 16158685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Targeted aiming movements are compromised in nonaffected limb of persons with stroke.
    Ketcham CJ; Rodriguez TM; Zihlman KA
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2007; 21(5):388-97. PubMed ID: 17369510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can the relationship between tangential velocity and radius of curvature explain motor constancy?
    Phillips JG
    Hum Mov Sci; 2008 Oct; 27(5):799-811. PubMed ID: 18922593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of constraint-induced therapy on kinematic outcomes and compensatory movement patterns: an exploratory study.
    Massie C; Malcolm MP; Greene D; Thaut M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 Apr; 90(4):571-9. PubMed ID: 19345771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The BUMP model of response planning: variable horizon predictive control accounts for the speed-accuracy tradeoffs and velocity profiles of aimed movement.
    Bye RT; Neilson PD
    Hum Mov Sci; 2008 Oct; 27(5):771-98. PubMed ID: 18774616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of a moving target versus a temporal constraint on reach and grasp in patients with Parkinson's disease.
    Majsak MJ; Kaminski T; Gentile AM; Gordon AM
    Exp Neurol; 2008 Apr; 210(2):479-88. PubMed ID: 18237731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.