328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17127821)
1. Aerodynamic and sound intensity measurements in tracheoesophageal voice.
Grolman W; Eerenstein SE; Tan FM; Tange RA; Schouwenburg PF
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2007; 69(2):68-76. PubMed ID: 17127821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Vocal efficiency in tracheoesophageal phonation.
Grolman W; Eerenstein SE; Tange RA; Canu G; Bogaardt H; Dijkhuis JP; Dreschler WA; Schouwenburg PF
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2008 Mar; 35(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 17959326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Alternative voice after laryngectomy using a sound-producing voice prosthesis.
van der Torn M; de Vries MP; Festen JM; Verdonck-de Leeuw IM; Mahieu HF
Laryngoscope; 2001 Feb; 111(2):336-46. PubMed ID: 11210885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro and in vivo comparison of the low-resistance Groningen and the Provox tracheosophageal voice prostheses.
Chung RP; Patel P; Ter Keurs M; Van Lith Bijl JT; Mahieu HF
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1998; 119(5):301-6. PubMed ID: 10089797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro evaluation of a double-membrane-based voice-producing element for laryngectomized patients.
Tack JW; Rakhorst G; van der Houwen EB; Mahieu HF; Verkerke GJ
Head Neck; 2007 Jul; 29(7):665-74. PubMed ID: 17252591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of position and angulation of a voice prosthesis on the aerodynamics of the pseudo-glottis.
Santos FHT; da Silva AR; Tourinho AMC; Erath B
J Biomech; 2021 Aug; 125():110594. PubMed ID: 34237659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. First clinical experience with a new non-indwelling voice prosthesis (Provox NID) for voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy.
Hancock K; Houghton B; Van As-Brooks CJ; Coman W
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Sep; 125(9):981-90. PubMed ID: 16109676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Comparative evaluation of the voice prosthesis after laryngectomy].
Kischk BT; Gross M
HNO; 1995 May; 43(5):304-10. PubMed ID: 7607916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of primary neopharyngeal repair on acoustic characteristics of tracheoesophageal voice after total laryngectomy.
Albirmawy OA; El-Guindy AS; Elsheikh MN; Saafan ME; Darwish ME
J Laryngol Otol; 2009 Apr; 123(4):426-33. PubMed ID: 18957154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Voice prostheses with sound-producing metal reed element--an experimental study and initial clinical results].
Hagen R; Berning K; Korn M; Schön F
Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Jun; 77(6):312-21. PubMed ID: 9701754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Voice rehabilitation following total laryngectomy: microvascular laryngeal replacement-plasty (laryngoplasty) instead of voice prosthesis].
Hagen R
Laryngorhinootologie; 1990 Apr; 69(4):213-6. PubMed ID: 2354015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Comparative intensity-pressure study of patients with a voice prosthesis].
Marraco M; Despons JL; Devars F; Carrat X; Traissac L
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1998; 119(5):307-10. PubMed ID: 10089798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical evaluation of a membrane-based voice-producing element for laryngectomized women.
Tack JW; Qiu Q; Schutte HK; Kooijman PG; Meeuwis CA; van der Houwen EB; Mahieu HF; Verkerke GJ
Head Neck; 2008 Sep; 30(9):1156-66. PubMed ID: 18642281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Temporal and perceptual characteristics of tracheoesophageal voice.
Williams SE; Scanio TS; Ritterman SI
Laryngoscope; 1989 Aug; 99(8 Pt 1):846-50. PubMed ID: 2755293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The pharyngoesophageal segment in laryngectomees--videoradiographic, acoustic, and voice quality perceptual data.
Lundström E; Hammarberg B; Munck-Wikland E; Edsborg N
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2008; 33(3):115-25. PubMed ID: 18608876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Aerodynamics of esophageal voice production with and without a Groningen voice prosthesis.
Schutte HK; Nieboer GJ
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2002; 54(1):8-18. PubMed ID: 11901261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Behavior of the cricopharyngeal segment during esophageal phonation in laryngectomized patients.
Aguiar-Ricz L; Dantas RO; Ricz H; Gielow I; Mamede RC; Perdoná GC
J Voice; 2007 Mar; 21(2):248-56. PubMed ID: 16504467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Evaluation of various phonatory parameters in laryngectomized patients: comparison of esophageal and tracheo-esophageal prosthesis phonation].
Gervasio CF; Cavalot AL; Nazionale G; Magnano M; Ragona R; Bussi M; Staffieri A; Cortesina G
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1998 Apr; 18(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 9844220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Aerodynamic studies of laryngectomees after the Amatsu tracheoesophageal shunt operation.
Kinishi M; Amatsu M
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1986; 95(2 Pt 1):181-4. PubMed ID: 3963691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of alaryngeal speech using a sound-producing voice prosthesis in relation to sex and pharyngoesophageal segment tonicity.
van der Torn M; van Gogh CD; Verdonck-de Leeuw IM; Festen JM; Verkerke GJ; Mahieu HF
Head Neck; 2006 May; 28(5):400-12. PubMed ID: 16470874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
