688 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17128425)
1. Randomization as a basis for inference in noninferiority trials.
Wiens BL
Pharm Stat; 2006; 5(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 17128425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Making sense of noninferiority: a clinical and statistical perspective on its application to cardiovascular clinical trials.
Kaul S; Diamond GA
Prog Cardiovasc Dis; 2007; 49(4):284-99. PubMed ID: 17185116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Issues with statistical risks for testing methods in noninferiority trial without a placebo ARM.
Hung HM; Wang SJ; O'Neill R
J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(2):201-13. PubMed ID: 17365218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interpretation and inference in noninferiority randomized controlled trials in drug research.
Wangge G; Klungel OH; Roes KC; de Boer A; Hoes AW; Knol MJ
Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2010 Sep; 88(3):420-3. PubMed ID: 20668448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On design considerations and randomization-based inference for community intervention trials.
Gail MH; Mark SD; Carroll RJ; Green SB; Pee D
Stat Med; 1996 Jun; 15(11):1069-92. PubMed ID: 8804140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An orwellian discourse on the meaning and measurement of noninferiority.
Diamond GA; Kaul S
Am J Cardiol; 2007 Jan; 99(2):284-7. PubMed ID: 17223435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bayesian approach to noninferiority trials for proportions.
Gamalo MA; Wu R; Tiwari RC
J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Sep; 21(5):902-19. PubMed ID: 21830922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Issues of simultaneous tests for noninferiority and superiority.
Ng TH
J Biopharm Stat; 2003 Nov; 13(4):629-39; discussion 641-62. PubMed ID: 14584713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Alternatives for discounting in the analysis of noninferiority trials.
Snapinn SM
J Biopharm Stat; 2004 May; 14(2):263-73. PubMed ID: 15206525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Statistical issues in interpreting clinical trials.
DeMets DL
J Intern Med; 2004 May; 255(5):529-37. PubMed ID: 15078496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A bootstrap-based test for establishing noninferiority in clinical trials.
Chen M; Kianifard F; Dhar SK
J Biopharm Stat; 2006 May; 16(3):357-63. PubMed ID: 16724490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bayesian inference for randomized clinical trials with treatment failures.
Shaffer ML; Chinchilli VM
Stat Med; 2004 Apr; 23(8):1215-28. PubMed ID: 15083479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Statistical issues on objective, design, and analysis of noninferiority active-controlled clinical trial.
Tsong Y; Wang SJ; Hung HM; Cui L
J Biopharm Stat; 2003 Feb; 13(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 12635901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Active-control clinical trials to establish equivalence or noninferiority: methodological and statistical concepts linked to quality.
Gomberg-Maitland M; Frison L; Halperin JL
Am Heart J; 2003 Sep; 146(3):398-403. PubMed ID: 12947355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cluster without fluster: The effect of correlated outcomes on inference in randomized clinical trials.
Proschan M; Follmann D
Stat Med; 2008 Mar; 27(6):795-809. PubMed ID: 17594680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sequential monitoring of randomization tests: stratified randomization.
Zhang Y; Rosenberger WF; Smythe RT
Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):865-72. PubMed ID: 17825016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A more powerful exact test of noninferiority from binary matched-pairs data.
Lloyd CJ; Moldovan MV
Stat Med; 2008 Aug; 27(18):3540-9. PubMed ID: 18314932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysing non-compliance in clinical trials: ethical imperative or mission impossible?
Goetghebeur EJ; Shapiro SH
Stat Med; 1996 Dec; 15(24):2813-26. PubMed ID: 8981688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hypotheses and type I error in active-control noninferiority trials.
Chen G; Wang YC; Chi GY
J Biopharm Stat; 2004 May; 14(2):301-13. PubMed ID: 15206528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Incorporating intermediate binary responses into interim analyses of clinical trials: a comparison of four methods.
Whitehead A; Sooriyarachchi MR; Whitehead J; Bolland K
Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(10):1646-66. PubMed ID: 17886243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
