These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17128596)

  • 1. Illusions of competence during study can be remedied by manipulations that enhance learners' sensitivity to retrieval conditions at test.
    Koriat A; Bjork RA
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):959-72. PubMed ID: 17128596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Illusions of competence in monitoring one's knowledge during study.
    Koriat A; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Mar; 31(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 15755238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mending metacognitive illusions: a comparison of mnemonic-based and theory-based procedures.
    Koriat A; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Sep; 32(5):1133-45. PubMed ID: 16938051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Illusions of competence and overestimation of associative memory for identical items: evidence from judgments of learning.
    Castel AD; McCabe DP; Roediger HL
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Feb; 14(1):107-11. PubMed ID: 17546739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Illusions of competence for phonetically, orthographically, and semantically similar word pairs.
    Tiede HL; Leboe JP
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Dec; 63(4):294-302. PubMed ID: 20025388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exploring a mnemonic debiasing account of the underconfidence-with-practice effect.
    Koriat A; Ma'ayan H; Sheffer L; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 May; 32(3):595-608. PubMed ID: 16719669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence that judgments of learning are causally related to study choice.
    Metcalfe J; Finn B
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Feb; 15(1):174-9. PubMed ID: 18605499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Judgments of Learning in Context: Backgrounds Can Both Reduce and Produce Metamemory Illusions.
    Tatz JR; Peynircioğlu ZF
    Mem Cognit; 2020 May; 48(4):581-595. PubMed ID: 31732926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. From JOLs to JOLs+: Directing learners' attention in retrieval practice to boost integrative argumentation.
    Wong SSH; Lim SWH
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2019 Dec; 25(4):543-557. PubMed ID: 31021111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Judgments of learning as memory modifiers.
    Soderstrom NC; Clark CT; Halamish V; Bjork EL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Mar; 41(2):553-8. PubMed ID: 25528101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Item-specific and relational encoding are effective at reducing the illusion of competence.
    Maxwell NP; Cates EE; Huff MJ
    Psychol Res; 2024 Apr; 88(3):1023-1044. PubMed ID: 37926731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the delayed-JOL effect.
    Dunlosky J; Nelson TO
    Mem Cognit; 1992 Jul; 20(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 1495399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Processing similarity does not improve metamemory: evidence against transfer-appropriate monitoring.
    Weaver CA; Kelemen WL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1058-65. PubMed ID: 14622046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fluency of retrieval at study affects judgments of learning (JOLs): an analytic or nonanalytic basis for JOLs?
    Matvey G; Dunlosky J; Guttentag R
    Mem Cognit; 2001 Mar; 29(2):222-33. PubMed ID: 11352205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. When people's judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: the "Displaced-JOL effect".
    Bui Y; Pyc MA; Bailey H
    Memory; 2018 Jul; 26(6):771-783. PubMed ID: 29187067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A stability bias in human memory: overestimating remembering and underestimating learning.
    Kornell N; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Nov; 138(4):449-68. PubMed ID: 19883130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Metacognitive illusions for auditory information: effects on monitoring and control.
    Rhodes MG; Castel AD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Jun; 16(3):550-4. PubMed ID: 19451383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Metamemory judgments and the benefits of repeated study: improving recall predictions through the activation of appropriate knowledge.
    Tiede HL; Leboe JP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):822-8. PubMed ID: 19379052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Why are children overconfident? Developmental differences in the implementation of accessibility cues when judging concept learning.
    van Loon M; de Bruin A; Leppink J; Roebers C
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2017 Jun; 158():77-94. PubMed ID: 28236719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of categorical relatedness on judgements of learning (JOLs).
    Matvey G; Dunlosky J; Schwartz BL
    Memory; 2006 Feb; 14(2):253-61. PubMed ID: 16484114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.