179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17128605)
1. Proactive interference and cuing effects in short-term cued recall: does foil context matter?
Goh WD; Tan H
Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):1063-79. PubMed ID: 17128605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Creating proactive interference in immediate recall: building a dog from a dart, a mop, and a fig.
Tehan G; Humphreys MS
Mem Cognit; 1998 May; 26(3):477-89. PubMed ID: 9610119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Altering memory through recall: the effects of cue-guided retrieval processing.
McDaniel MA; Kowitz MD; Dunay PK
Mem Cognit; 1989 Jul; 17(4):423-34. PubMed ID: 2761400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cuing effects in short-term recall.
Tehan G; Humphreys MS
Mem Cognit; 1996 Nov; 24(6):719-32. PubMed ID: 8961817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Item-specific interference caused by cue-dependent forgetting.
Chandler CC; Gargano GJ
Mem Cognit; 1995 Nov; 23(6):701-8. PubMed ID: 8538443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Conjunction errors, recollection-based rejections, and forgetting in a continuous recognition task.
Jones TC; Atchley P
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 16478341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Immunity to proactive interference is not a property of the focus of attention in working memory.
Ralph A; Walters JN; Stevens A; Fitzgerald KJ; Tehan G; Surprenant AM; Neath I; Turcotte J
Mem Cognit; 2011 Feb; 39(2):217-30. PubMed ID: 21264609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Semantic similarity and immediate serial recall: is there an effect on all trials?
Saint-Aubin J; Ouellette D; Poirier M
Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Feb; 12(1):171-7. PubMed ID: 15945210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Semantic and phonological contributions to short-term repetition and long-term cued sentence recall.
Meltzer JA; Rose NS; Deschamps T; Leigh RC; Panamsky L; Silberberg A; Madani N; Links KA
Mem Cognit; 2016 Feb; 44(2):307-29. PubMed ID: 26374330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing word fragment completion and cued recall with letter cues.
Nelson DL; Canas JJ; Bajo MT; Keelean PD
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1987 Oct; 13(4):542-52. PubMed ID: 2959738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Selective access in cued recall: the roles of retrieval cues and domains of encoding.
McEvoy CL; Nelson DL
Mem Cognit; 1990 Jan; 18(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 2314223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Semantic and phonological information in sentence recall: converging psycholinguistic and neuropsychological evidence.
Schweppe J; Rummer R; Bormann T; Martin RC
Cogn Neuropsychol; 2011 Dec; 28(8):521-45. PubMed ID: 22813068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Semantic organization and verbal episodic memory in patients with mild and moderate Alzheimer's disease.
Herlitz A; Viitanen M
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1991 Jul; 13(4):559-74. PubMed ID: 1918286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Resolving semantic and proactive interference in memory over the short-term.
Atkins AS; Berman MG; Reuter-Lorenz PA; Lewis RL; Jonides J
Mem Cognit; 2011 Jul; 39(5):806-17. PubMed ID: 21327614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transient phonemic codes and immunity to proactive interference.
Tehan G; Humphreys MS
Mem Cognit; 1995 Mar; 23(2):181-91. PubMed ID: 7731363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lexical and semantic search in cued recall, fragment completion, perceptual identification, and recognition.
Nelson DL; McEvoy CL; Bajo MT
Am J Psychol; 1988; 101(4):465-80. PubMed ID: 3232723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. When meaning is useless.
Benetello A; Cecchetto C; Papagno C
Memory; 2015; 23(7):1001-12. PubMed ID: 25121998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Encoding specificity revisited: the role of semantics.
Hannon B; Craik FI
Can J Exp Psychol; 2001 Sep; 55(3):231-43. PubMed ID: 11605558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of phonological and semantic cuing on encoding and retrieval processes in adolescent psychosis.
Doré MC; Caza N; Gingras N; Maziade M; Rouleau N
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2009 Jul; 31(5):533-44. PubMed ID: 18773312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Priming or executive control? Associative priming of cue encoding increases "switch costs" in the explicit task-cuing procedure.
Logan GD; Schneider DW
Mem Cognit; 2006 Sep; 34(6):1250-9. PubMed ID: 17225506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
