These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17128605)

  • 21. Making remembering more memorable.
    Leppanen ML; Lyle KB
    Memory; 2018 Aug; 26(7):960-973. PubMed ID: 29291672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Encoding and cuing sounds and senses.
    Nelson DL; Friedrich MA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1980 Nov; 6(6):717-31. PubMed ID: 7441188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Age of acquisition's effect on memory for semantically associated word pairs.
    Gullick MM; Juhasz BJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Aug; 61(8):1177-85. PubMed ID: 18609409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Does organization improve priming?
    Rappold VA; Hashtroudi S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1991 Jan; 17(1):103-14. PubMed ID: 1826727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. No retrieval-induced forgetting using item-specific independent cues: evidence against a general inhibitory account.
    Camp G; Pecher D; Schmidt HG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):950-8. PubMed ID: 17723071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of phonological similarity and concurrent irrelevant articulation on short-term-memory recall of repeated and novel word lists.
    Coltheart V
    Mem Cognit; 1993 Jul; 21(4):539-45. PubMed ID: 8350745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Experience with proactive interference diminishes its effects: mechanisms of change.
    Wahlheim CN; Jacoby LL
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Feb; 39(2):185-95. PubMed ID: 21264624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Predicting memory performance under conditions of proactive interference: immediate and delayed judgments of learning.
    Wahlheim CN
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Jul; 39(5):827-38. PubMed ID: 21264574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Part-list cuing can be transient and lasting: the role of encoding.
    Bäuml KH; Aslan A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 16478338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Context effects in recall and recognition at various retention intervals.
    Culross RR
    Percept Mot Skills; 1992 Jun; 74(3 Pt 2):1216-8. PubMed ID: 1501990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Recency effects in direct and indirect memory tasks.
    McKenzie WA; Humphreys MS
    Mem Cognit; 1991 Jul; 19(4):321-31. PubMed ID: 1895942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Levels of processing with free and cued recall and unilateral temporal lobe epilepsy.
    Lespinet-Najib V; N'Kaoua B; Sauzéon H; Bresson C; Rougier A; Claverie B
    Brain Lang; 2004 Apr; 89(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 15010240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Recognition during recall failure: Semantic feature matching as a mechanism for recognition of semantic cues when recall fails.
    Cleary AM; Ryals AJ; Wagner SR
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Jan; 44(1):50-62. PubMed ID: 26282623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Source memory in the absence of successful cued recall.
    Cook GI; Marsh RL; Hicks JL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):828-35. PubMed ID: 16822150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Phonological information in short-term memory of sentences].
    Rummer R; Schrobildgen M
    Z Exp Psychol; 2000; 47(2):144-54. PubMed ID: 10829617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of list organization and retrieval cues on children's delayed recall.
    Ramisetty-Mikler S
    J Genet Psychol; 1992 Dec; 153(4):421-33. PubMed ID: 1295954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Exploring the role of attention during memory retrieval: effects of semantic encoding and divided attention.
    Lozito JP; Mulligan NW
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):986-98. PubMed ID: 17128598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of target set size on feelings of knowing and cued recall: implications for the cue effectiveness and partial-retrieval hypotheses.
    Schreiber TA
    Mem Cognit; 1998 May; 26(3):553-71. PubMed ID: 9610124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Investigating the roles of phonological and semantic memory in sentence recall.
    Alloway TP
    Memory; 2007 Aug; 15(6):605-15. PubMed ID: 17654276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Support for an auto-associative model of spoken cued recall: evidence from fMRI.
    de Zubicaray G; McMahon K; Eastburn M; Pringle AJ; Lorenz L; Humphreys MS
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(4):824-35. PubMed ID: 16989874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.