These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17128614)

  • 21. Not all narrative shifts function equally.
    Rich SS; Taylor HA
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Oct; 28(7):1257-66. PubMed ID: 11126946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Concurrent prospective memory task increases mind wandering during online reading for difficult but not easy texts.
    Schurer T; Opitz B; Schubert T
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Jan; 51(1):221-233. PubMed ID: 35233743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of disfluency on mind wandering during text comprehension.
    Faber M; Mills C; Kopp K; D'Mello S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Jun; 24(3):914-919. PubMed ID: 27600802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. DEWEX: a system for designing and conducting Web-based experiments.
    Naumann A; Brunstein A; Krems JF
    Behav Res Methods; 2007 May; 39(2):248-58. PubMed ID: 17695352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparing two modes of teaching a question-answering strategy for enhancing reading comprehension: didactic and self-instructional training.
    Graham L; Wong BY
    J Learn Disabil; 1993 Apr; 26(4):270-9. PubMed ID: 8515191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Motivated comprehension regulation: vigilant versus eager metacognitive control.
    Miele DB; Molden DC; Gardner WL
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Sep; 37(6):779-95. PubMed ID: 19679858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Hypertext comprehension of deaf and hard-of-hearing students and students with specific language impairment.
    Blom H; Segers E; Hermans D; Knoors H; Verhoeven L
    Res Dev Disabil; 2017 Feb; 61():127-137. PubMed ID: 28073077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Impacts of comprehensive reading instruction on diverse outcomes of low- and high-achieving readers.
    Guthrie JT; McRae A; Coddington CS; Lutz Klauda S; Wigfield A; Barbosa P
    J Learn Disabil; 2009; 42(3):195-214. PubMed ID: 19264929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Are performance predictions for text based on ease of processing?
    Rawson KA; Dunlosky J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jan; 28(1):69-80. PubMed ID: 11827088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Metacomprehension skills depend on the type of text: An analysis from Differential Item Functioning.
    León JA; Martínez-Huertas JA; Olmos R; Moreno JD; Escudero I
    Psicothema; 2019 Feb; 31(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 30664413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Improving text comprehension: scaffolding adolescents into strategic reading.
    Ukrainetz TA
    Semin Speech Lang; 2015 Feb; 36(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 25633141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comprehension strategies in the development of a mental model.
    O'Brien EJ; Albrecht JE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1992 Jul; 18(4):777-84. PubMed ID: 1385615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Examining the online reading behavior and performance of fifth-graders: evidence from eye-movement data.
    Sung YT; Wu MD; Chen CK; Chang KE
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():665. PubMed ID: 26074837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Presence and place of main ideas and examples in study texts.
    Beishuizen J; Asscher J; Prinsen F; Elshout-Mohr M
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2003 Sep; 73(Pt 3):291-316. PubMed ID: 14672145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comprehending Comprehension: Selected Possibilities for Clinical Practice Within a Multidimensional Model.
    Wallach GP; Ocampo A
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2017 Apr; 48(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 28395295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The role of look-backs in the processing of written sarcasm.
    Olkoniemi H; Johander E; Kaakinen JK
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Jan; 47(1):87-105. PubMed ID: 30168095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Computer-based and paper-based reading comprehension in adolescents with typical language development and language-learning disabilities.
    Srivastava P; Gray S
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2012 Oct; 43(4):424-37. PubMed ID: 22434825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Influence of the type of visualization on the construction of mental models during picture and text comprehension].
    Schnotz W; Bannert M
    Z Exp Psychol; 1999; 46(3):217-36. PubMed ID: 10474324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effects of summarization and factual retrieval practice on text comprehension and text retention in elementary education.
    Ophuis-Cox FHA; Rozendal L; Catrysse L; Joosten-Ten Brinke D; Camp G
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2024 Jun; 30(2):258-267. PubMed ID: 38127533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Processing of expository and narrative texts by low- and high-comprehending children.
    Kraal A; Koornneef AW; Saab N; van den Broek PW
    Read Writ; 2018; 31(9):2017-2040. PubMed ID: 30416261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.