These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17129563)

  • 1. Genetic heterogeneity of residual variance in broiler chickens.
    Rowe SJ; White IM; Avendaño S; Hill WG
    Genet Sel Evol; 2006; 38(6):617-35. PubMed ID: 17129563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genetic variability in residual variation of body weight and conformation scores in broiler chickens.
    Wolc A; White IM; Avendano S; Hill WG
    Poult Sci; 2009 Jun; 88(6):1156-61. PubMed ID: 19439624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genetic heterogeneity of residual variance of hatch weight in Mazandaran native chicken.
    Yousefi Zonuz A; Alijani S; Rafat SA
    Br Poult Sci; 2019 Aug; 60(4):366-372. PubMed ID: 31046426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Heterogeneity of variance by sire breed, sex, and dam breed in 200- and 365-day weights of beef cattle from a top cross experiment.
    Rodríguez-Almeida FA; Van Vleck LD; Cundiff LV; Kachman SD
    J Anim Sci; 1995 Sep; 73(9):2579-88. PubMed ID: 8582847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimation of genetic variation in residual variance in female and male broiler chickens.
    Mulder HA; Hill WG; Vereijken A; Veerkamp RF
    Animal; 2009 Dec; 3(12):1673-80. PubMed ID: 22443551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genetic heterogeneity of variance in production traits of laying hens.
    Wolc A; Lisowski M; Hill WG; White IM
    Br Poult Sci; 2011 Oct; 52(5):537-40. PubMed ID: 22029779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of accounting for different phenotypic variances by sire breed and sex on selection of sires based on expected progeny differences for 200- and 365-day weights.
    Rodríguez-Almeida FA; Van Vleck LD; Cundiff LV
    J Anim Sci; 1995 Sep; 73(9):2589-99. PubMed ID: 8582848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Micro-genetic environmental sensitivity across macro-environments of chickens reared in Burkina Faso and France.
    Madsen MD; Duijvesteijn N; van der Werf J; Clark S
    Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Nov; 55(1):85. PubMed ID: 38036958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimation of the interaction of dams with hatches, sires in breed, and breed of sire for five traits in the fowl.
    Vasquez CG; Bohren BB
    Poult Sci; 1983 Nov; 62(11):2125-9. PubMed ID: 6657556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Variance component and breeding value estimation for genetic heterogeneity of residual variance in Swedish Holstein dairy cattle.
    Rönnegård L; Felleki M; Fikse WF; Mulder HA; Strandberg E
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Apr; 96(4):2627-2636. PubMed ID: 23415533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genetic variation in susceptibility to Marek's disease in a commercial broiler population.
    Emara MG; Abdellatif MA; Pollock DL; Sadjadi M; Cloud SS; Pope CR; Rosenberger JK; Kim H
    Avian Dis; 2001; 45(2):400-9. PubMed ID: 11417819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Variance heterogeneity in direct and maternal weight traits by sex and percent purebred for Simmental-sired calves.
    Garrick DJ; Pollak EJ; Quaas RL; Van Vleck LD
    J Anim Sci; 1989 Oct; 67(10):2515-28. PubMed ID: 2808157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of ignoring random sire and dam effects on estimates and standard errors of breed comparisons.
    Barkhouse KL; Van Vleck LD; Cundiff LV
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Sep; 76(9):2279-86. PubMed ID: 9781483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimation of genetic parameters based on individual and group mean records in laying hens.
    Nurgiartiningsih VM; Mielenz N; Preisinger R; Schmutz M; Schueler L
    Br Poult Sci; 2004 Oct; 45(5):604-10. PubMed ID: 15623212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genetic heterogeneity of within-family variance of body weight in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar).
    Sonesson AK; Odegård J; Rönnegård L
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Oct; 45(1):41. PubMed ID: 24134557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of estimated breeding values with genomic information on males, females, or both: an example on broiler chicken.
    Lourenco DA; Fragomeni BO; Tsuruta S; Aguilar I; Zumbach B; Hawken RJ; Legarra A; Misztal I
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Jul; 47(1):56. PubMed ID: 26133806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genetic control of residual variance of yearling weight in Nellore beef cattle.
    Iung LHS; Neves HHR; Mulder HA; Carvalheiro R
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Apr; 95(4):1425-1433. PubMed ID: 28464101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Variance components and breeding values for growth traits from different statistical models.
    Ferreira GB; MacNeil MD; Van Vleck LD
    J Anim Sci; 1999 Oct; 77(10):2641-50. PubMed ID: 10521023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimation of genetic variance for macro- and micro-environmental sensitivity using double hierarchical generalized linear models.
    Mulder HA; Rönnegård L; Fikse WF; Veerkamp RF; Strandberg E
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Jul; 45(1):23. PubMed ID: 23827014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genetic variance in micro-environmental sensitivity for milk and milk quality in Walloon Holstein cattle.
    Vandenplas J; Bastin C; Gengler N; Mulder HA
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Sep; 96(9):5977-90. PubMed ID: 23871372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.