These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Reverse fingerprinting, similarity searching by group fusion and fingerprint bit importance. Williams C Mol Divers; 2006 Aug; 10(3):311-32. PubMed ID: 17031535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of 2D fingerprint methods for multiple-template similarity searching on compound activity classes of increasing structural diversity. Tovar A; Eckert H; Bajorath J ChemMedChem; 2007 Feb; 2(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 17143917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effectiveness of graph-based and fingerprint-based similarity measures for virtual screening of 2D chemical structure databases. Raymond JW; Willett P J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2002 Jan; 16(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 12197666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Enhancing the effectiveness of virtual screening by fusing nearest neighbor lists: a comparison of similarity coefficients. Whittle M; Gillet VJ; Willett P; Alex A; Loesel J J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(5):1840-8. PubMed ID: 15446844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Enhancing the effectiveness of similarity-based virtual screening using nearest-neighbor information. Hert J; Willett P; Wilton DJ; Acklin P; Azzaoui K; Jacoby E; Schuffenhauer A J Med Chem; 2005 Nov; 48(22):7049-54. PubMed ID: 16250664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Design and evaluation of a novel class-directed 2D fingerprint to search for structurally diverse active compounds. Eckert H; Bajorath J J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(6):2515-26. PubMed ID: 17125192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inverse frequency weighting of fragments for similarity-based virtual screening. Arif SM; Holliday JD; Willett P J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Aug; 50(8):1340-9. PubMed ID: 20672867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bit silencing in fingerprints enables the derivation of compound class-directed similarity metrics. Wang Y; Bajorath J J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Sep; 48(9):1754-9. PubMed ID: 18698839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Maximum common substructure-based data fusion in similarity searching. Duesbury E; Holliday J; Willett P J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Feb; 55(2):222-30. PubMed ID: 25602464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. New methods for ligand-based virtual screening: use of data fusion and machine learning to enhance the effectiveness of similarity searching. Hert J; Willett P; Wilton DJ; Acklin P; Azzaoui K; Jacoby E; Schuffenhauer A J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(2):462-70. PubMed ID: 16562973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Scaffold hopping using two-dimensional fingerprints: true potential, black magic, or a hopeless endeavor? Guidelines for virtual screening. Vogt M; Stumpfe D; Geppert H; Bajorath J J Med Chem; 2010 Aug; 53(15):5707-15. PubMed ID: 20684607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Unconventional 2D shape similarity method affords comparable enrichment as a 3D shape method in virtual screening experiments. Ebalunode JO; Zheng W J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jun; 49(6):1313-20. PubMed ID: 19480404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]