These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17130978)

  • 1. [Controversies in the editorial process and in scientific publications].
    Villamil Cajoto I; Villacián Vicedo MJ
    Rev Med Chil; 2006 Jul; 134(7):927-9. PubMed ID: 17130978
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The manuscripts' review process in Revista Médica de Chile and its peer-reviewers during the year 2012].
    Reyes B H; Andresen H M; Palma H J
    Rev Med Chil; 2013 Jul; 141(7):903-8. PubMed ID: 24356739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The peer review at high risk from COVID-19 - are we socially distancing from scientific quality control?
    Kambakamba P; Geoghegan J; Hoti E
    Br J Surg; 2020 Aug; 107(9):e334-e335. PubMed ID: 32652536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Peer review in PLoS Medicine.
    The
    PLoS Med; 2007 Jan; 4(1):e58. PubMed ID: 17411325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Where is the honor in honorary authorship?
    Kressel HY; Dixon AK
    Radiology; 2011 May; 259(2):324-7. PubMed ID: 21386052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The growing challenge of the editorial process in Revista Médica de Chile].
    Reyes B H; Andresen H M; Palma H J
    Rev Med Chil; 2006 Jan; 134(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 16532156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stroke journal: what is being published to advance the field?
    Saposnik G; Johnston SC; Raptis S; Ovbiagele B; Fisher M;
    Stroke; 2013 Sep; 44(9):2644-9. PubMed ID: 23908060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The scientific process: new forces attempt to enter the scene.
    Kinne O
    Dis Aquat Organ; 2003 Jun; 55(1):1. PubMed ID: 12887247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Conflicts of interest and disclosures in publications.
    Camilleri M; Dubnansky EC; Rustgi AK
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Mar; 5(3):268-73. PubMed ID: 17368225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Our editorial process--some experiences and reflections.
    Emmelin M; Wall S
    Scand J Public Health; 2003; 31(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 12850969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peer Reviewers and Quality.
    Davidson HE
    Consult Pharm; 2015 Jan; 30(1):1. PubMed ID: 27424332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [History, purposes and characteristics of medical journals].
    Reyes B H
    Rev Med Chil; 2018 Aug; 146(8):913-920. PubMed ID: 30534871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new Editorial Board of Monaldi archives for chest disease.
    Spanevello A; Balbi B
    Monaldi Arch Chest Dis; 2004; 61(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 15366328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What weight does impact factor carry?
    Aase S
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2008 Oct; 108(10):1604-7. PubMed ID: 18926118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Opening up Peer Review.
    DePellegrin TA; Johnston M
    Genetics; 2020 Nov; 216(3):619-620. PubMed ID: 33158984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peer Review of a Manuscript Submission: A How-To Guide for Effective and Efficient Commentary.
    Allen LA; Ho PM
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2017 Dec; 10(12):. PubMed ID: 29237748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Lakartidningen's scrutiny routines--equal to the heavies. The peer review system and the expert editorial staff guarantee scientific quality].
    Milerad J; Ahlberg J; Bågedahl-Strindlund M; Eliasson M; Fridén B; Håkansson A; Sundberg CJ; Ostergren J
    Lakartidningen; 2003 Nov; 100(48):3934-6. PubMed ID: 14717088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The editorial process for medical journals: I. Introduction of a series and discussion of the responsibilities of editors, authors, and reviewers.
    Liesegang TJ; Albert DM; Schachat AP; Minckler DS
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Jul; 136(1):109-13. PubMed ID: 12834678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How does peer review work?
    Aaron L
    Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Training and experience of peer reviewers: an additional variable to consider.
    Kulstad E
    PLoS Med; 2007 Mar; 4(3):e143; author reply e145. PubMed ID: 17388681
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.