These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17132369)

  • 41. Several women students were diagnosed with chlamydial infections last term so we are keen to promote awareness of this condition.
    Kilcoin A
    Nurs Times; 2001 Sep 20-26; 97(38):39. PubMed ID: 11935856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The National Chlamydia Screening Programme and the NICE guidance on one-to-one interventions: remember the under-25s.
    Simms I; Battison T; Macintosh M; Randall S; Clarke J
    Sex Transm Infect; 2007 Apr; 83(2):171. PubMed ID: 17435057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. An evaluation of the impact of a national health demonstration project on testing and management for Chlamydia trachomatis infections in two regions of Scotland.
    Penney GC; Brace V; Cameron S; Tucker J
    Public Health; 2005 Nov; 119(11):1031-8. PubMed ID: 16084540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Chlamydia infections increasing in Sweden, too. Better knowledge and a national intervention program are necessary].
    Herrmann B
    Lakartidningen; 2006 May 3-9; 103(18):1412-5. PubMed ID: 16729453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Chlamydia--the problem that just won't go away.
    Coughlan E; Bagshaw S
    N Z Med J; 2005 Aug; 118(1220):U1605. PubMed ID: 16132067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Translating and sustaining a chlamydial screening intervention 4 years later.
    Tebb K; Wibbelsman C; Ko T; Neuhaus JM; Shafer MA
    Arch Intern Med; 2011 Oct; 171(19):1767-8. PubMed ID: 22025436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection: which target group and at what price?].
    Postma MJ; van den Hoek JA
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Jun; 143(23):1237-8. PubMed ID: 10428675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Chlamydia screening would pay dividends.
    Robinson A
    Practitioner; 1998 Oct; 242(1591):667. PubMed ID: 10343443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Chlamydia screening practices of primary-care providers--Wake County, North Carolina, 1996.
    JAMA; 1997 Oct; 278(15):1229-30. PubMed ID: 9333252
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Adolescents and chlamydia: cervix microbiology among adolescents; the first statistics of the family planning centers according to the Calmat law].
    Henry-Suchet J
    Contracept Fertil Sex; 1995 May; 23(5):323-6. PubMed ID: 7613578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Chlamydia screening in the United Kingdom.
    Catchpole M; Robinson A; Temple A
    Sex Transm Infect; 2003 Feb; 79(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 12576603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Most trusts will not meet chlamydia screening target.
    White C
    BMJ; 2007 Nov; 335(7628):1010. PubMed ID: 18006980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Government to press trusts to meet screening targets for chlamydia.
    White C
    BMJ; 2008 Feb; 336(7639):299. PubMed ID: 18258958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. NHS Health Check programme wastes £450m a year, report says.
    Wise J
    BMJ; 2015 Sep; 351():h5039. PubMed ID: 26396137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. What general practitioners should do about breast screening.
    Creighton PA
    BMJ; 1995 Jan; 310(6974):204-5. PubMed ID: 7866112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Patients not seen in three years: will invitations for health checks be of benefit?
    Noakes J
    Br J Gen Pract; 1991 Aug; 41(349):335-8. PubMed ID: 1777280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Differential selection processes in opportunistic chlamydia screening.
    Heijne JC; Low N
    Sex Transm Infect; 2011 Oct; 87(6):454-5. PubMed ID: 21705377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Organisation of screening: a practical view.
    Jenkins S
    BMJ; 1990 Apr; 300(6731):1050-2. PubMed ID: 2344518
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. ["Turbo-Check-up" for 1,000 euros. Is this really of any value?].
    Ochmann U
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2014 Mar; 156 Spec No 1(1):17. PubMed ID: 24930336
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Response to Capewell et al.
    Waterall J; Greaves F; Gresser C; Kearney M; Fenton KA
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2015 Jun; 37(2):193-4. PubMed ID: 26022811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.