These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17132559)

  • 1. The effect of a hearing aid noise reduction algorithm on the acquisition of novel speech contrasts.
    Marcoux AM; Yathiraj A; Côté I; Logan J
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Dec; 45(12):707-14. PubMed ID: 17132559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of performance on the hearing in noise test using directional microphones and digital noise reduction algorithms.
    Nordrum S; Erler S; Garstecki D; Dhar S
    Am J Audiol; 2006 Jun; 15(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 16803795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The design and testing of a noise reduction algorithm based on spectral subtraction.
    Elberling C; Ludvigsen C; Keidser G
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():39-49. PubMed ID: 8153563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital signal processing (DSP) applications for multiband loudness correction digital hearing aids and cochlear implants.
    Dillier N; Frölich T; Kompis M; Bögli H; Lai WK
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):95-109. PubMed ID: 8263833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Language-experience facilitates discrimination of /d-th/ in monolingual and bilingual acquisition of English.
    Sundara M; Polka L; Genesee F
    Cognition; 2006 Jun; 100(2):369-88. PubMed ID: 16115614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Content and procedural learning in repeated sentence tests of speech perception.
    Yund EW; Woods DL
    Ear Hear; 2010 Dec; 31(6):769-78. PubMed ID: 20562624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of a noise reduction method--comparison between observed scores and scores predicted from STI.
    Ludvigsen C; Elberling C; Keidser G
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():50-5. PubMed ID: 8153564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Statistical phonetic learning in infants: facilitation and feature generalization.
    Maye J; Weiss DJ; Aslin RN
    Dev Sci; 2008 Jan; 11(1):122-34. PubMed ID: 18171374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using genetic algorithms with subjective input from human subjects: implications for fitting hearing aids and cochlear implants.
    Başkent D; Eiler CL; Edwards B
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):370-80. PubMed ID: 17485986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hearing aid low frequency cut: effect on Mandarin tone and vowel perception in normal-hearing listeners.
    Zhang J; McPherson B
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2008; 60(4):179-87. PubMed ID: 18446038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Phonological mismatch makes aided speech recognition in noise cognitively taxing.
    Rudner M; Foo C; Rönnberg J; Lunner T
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):879-92. PubMed ID: 17982373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Early exposure to non-native language alters pre-attentive vowel discrimination.
    Peltola MS; Kuntola M; Tamminen H; Hämäläinen H; Aaltonen O
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 Nov; 388(3):121-5. PubMed ID: 16039056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech-clarity judgments of hearing-aid-processed speech in noise: differing polar patterns and acoustic environments.
    Amlani AM; Rakerd B; Punch JL
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Jun; 45(6):319-30. PubMed ID: 16777778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Selectivity of modulation interference for consonant identification in normal-hearing listeners.
    Apoux F; Bacon SP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Mar; 123(3):1665-72. PubMed ID: 18345854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Labadie RF; Haynes DS
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 17609614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using hearing aid adaptive directional microphones to enhance cochlear implant performance.
    Chung K; Zeng FG
    Hear Res; 2009 Apr; 250(1-2):27-37. PubMed ID: 19450437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perception of acoustically degraded sentences in bilingual listeners who differ in age of english acquisition.
    Shi LF
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Aug; 53(4):821-35. PubMed ID: 20220026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Noise reduction improves memory for target language speech in competing native but not foreign language speech.
    Ng EH; Rudner M; Lunner T; Rönnberg J
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):82-91. PubMed ID: 25166628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech perception in infancy predicts language development in the second year of life: a longitudinal study.
    Tsao FM; Liu HM; Kuhl PK
    Child Dev; 2004; 75(4):1067-84. PubMed ID: 15260865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech perception in noise for children with auditory neuropathy/dys-synchrony type hearing loss.
    Rance G; Barker E; Mok M; Dowell R; Rincon A; Garratt R
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):351-60. PubMed ID: 17485984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.