These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

640 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17133854)

  • 1. The evolution of female mating preferences: differentiation from species with promiscuous males can promote speciation.
    McPeek MA; Gavrilets S
    Evolution; 2006 Oct; 60(10):1967-80. PubMed ID: 17133854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sex differences in mate recognition and conspecific preference in species with mutual mate choice.
    Kozak GM; Reisland M; Boughmann JW
    Evolution; 2009 Feb; 63(2):353-65. PubMed ID: 19154359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Male versus female mate choice: sexual selection and the evolution of species recognition via reinforcement.
    Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2007 Dec; 61(12):2772-89. PubMed ID: 17924955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adaptive speciation when assortative mating is based on female preference for male marker traits.
    Doebeli M
    J Evol Biol; 2005 Nov; 18(6):1587-600. PubMed ID: 16313470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relative abundance and the species-specific reinforcement of male mating preference in the Chrysochus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) hybrid zone.
    Peterson MA; Honchak BM; Locke SE; Beeman TE; Mendoza J; Green J; Buckingham KJ; White MA; Monsen KJ
    Evolution; 2005 Dec; 59(12):2639-55. PubMed ID: 16526511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can non-directional male mating preferences facilitate honest female ornamentation?
    Chenoweth SF; Doughty P; Kokko H
    Ecol Lett; 2006 Feb; 9(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 16958883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gentlemen prefer blondes: the evolution of mate preference among strategically allocated males.
    Rowell JT; Servedio MR
    Am Nat; 2009 Jan; 173(1):12-25. PubMed ID: 19063659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Female mate-choice drives the evolution of male-biased dispersal in a social mammal.
    Höner OP; Wachter B; East ML; Streich WJ; Wilhelm K; Burke T; Hofer H
    Nature; 2007 Aug; 448(7155):798-801. PubMed ID: 17700698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Advertisement-call preferences in diploid-tetraploid treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis and Hyla versicolor): implications for mate choice and the evolution of communication systems.
    Gerhardt HC
    Evolution; 2005 Feb; 59(2):395-408. PubMed ID: 15807424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Female mating preference for own males on species and population level in Chromaphyosemion killifishes (Cyprinodontiformes, Nothobranchiidae).
    Kullmann H; Klemme B
    Zoology (Jena); 2007; 110(5):377-86. PubMed ID: 17897816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Male and female preference for conspecifics in a fish with male parental care (Percidae: Catonotus).
    O'Rourke CF; Mendelson TC
    Behav Processes; 2010 Oct; 85(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 20637844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Females benefit from multiple mating but not multiple mates in the burying beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides.
    House CM; Walling CA; Stamper CE; Moore AJ
    J Evol Biol; 2009 Sep; 22(9):1961-6. PubMed ID: 19682308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diversification of conspecific signals in sympatry: geographic overlap drives multidimensional reproductive character displacement in frogs.
    Lemmon EM
    Evolution; 2009 May; 63(5):1155-70. PubMed ID: 19210538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Female mate preferences in Drosophila simulans: evolution and costs.
    Sharma MD; Tregenza T; Hosken DJ
    J Evol Biol; 2010 Aug; 23(8):1672-9. PubMed ID: 20546089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A theoretical study on the evolution of male parental care and female multiple mating: effects of female mate choice and male care bias.
    Seki M; Wakano JY; Ihara Y
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Jul; 247(2):281-96. PubMed ID: 17448499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gender differences in species recognition and the evolution of asymmetric sexual isolation.
    Svensson EI; Karlsson K; Friberg M; Eroukhmanoff F
    Curr Biol; 2007 Nov; 17(22):1943-7. PubMed ID: 17935996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles.
    Fedina TY; Lewis SM
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2008 May; 83(2):151-71. PubMed ID: 18429767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assortative mating in poison-dart frogs based on an ecologically important trait.
    Reynolds RG; Fitzpatrick BM
    Evolution; 2007 Sep; 61(9):2253-9. PubMed ID: 17767594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The relative role of male vs. female mate choice in maintaining assortative pairing among discrete colour morphs.
    Pryke SR; Griffith SC
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Jul; 20(4):1512-21. PubMed ID: 17584244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The relative importance of different direct benefits in the mate choices of a field cricket.
    Wagner WE; Basolo AL
    Evolution; 2007 Mar; 61(3):617-22. PubMed ID: 17348924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.