These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

51 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17133937)

  • 1. [Experimental and computational evaluation of quality of digital X-ray imaging].
    Zelikman MI; Kokuev AN; Kruchinin SA; Lobov DP
    Med Tekh; 2006; (5):14-6. PubMed ID: 17133937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Assessment of parameters of digital X-ray detectors by the method of exposure of the working area of the detector to uniform X-ray radiation].
    Mazurov AI
    Med Tekh; 2007; (5):13-5. PubMed ID: 18030767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Solid-state, flat-panel, digital radiography detectors and their physical imaging characteristics.
    Cowen AR; Kengyelics SM; Davies AG
    Clin Radiol; 2008 May; 63(5):487-98. PubMed ID: 18374710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A shape-based segmentation algorithm for X-ray digital subtraction angiography images.
    Franchi D; Gallo P; Marsili L; Placidi G
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2009 Jun; 94(3):267-78. PubMed ID: 19264373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Experimental evaluation of fiber-interspaced antiscatter grids for large patient imaging with digital x-ray systems.
    Fetterly KA; Schueler BA
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(16):4863-80. PubMed ID: 17671340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital radiography: image quality and radiation dose.
    Seibert JA
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):586-98. PubMed ID: 18849693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patient doses and image quality in digital chest radiology.
    Salát D; Nikodemová D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):147-9. PubMed ID: 18321878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is digital better in dental radiography?
    Zdesar U; Fortuna T; Valantic B; Skrk D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):138-9. PubMed ID: 18375462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Physical image quality comparison of four types of digital detector for chest radiology.
    Fernandez JM; Ordiales JM; Guibelalde E; Prieto C; Vano E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):140-3. PubMed ID: 18283060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automated analysis of phantom images for the evaluation of long-term reproducibility in digital mammography.
    Gennaro G; Ferro F; Contento G; Fornasin F; di Maggio C
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1387-407. PubMed ID: 17301461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Determining air kerma from pixel values in digital mammography.
    Toroi P; Nieminen MT; Tenkanen-Rautakoski P; Varjonen M
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jun; 54(12):3865-79. PubMed ID: 19491454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exposure variability and image quality in computed radiography.
    Fauber TL
    Radiol Technol; 2009; 80(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 19153197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital templating in total hip arthroplasty.
    Whiddon DR; Bono JV
    Instr Course Lect; 2008; 57():273-9. PubMed ID: 18399591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the X-ray digital linear tomosynthesis reconstruction processing method for metal artifact reduction.
    Gomi T; Hirano H; Umeda T
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2009 Jun; 33(4):267-74. PubMed ID: 19237263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Considerations for selecting a digital radiography system.
    Morin RL; Seibert JA
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Mar; 2(3):287-90. PubMed ID: 17411815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing types of digital capture.
    Armbrust LJ
    Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract; 2009 Jul; 39(4):677-88. PubMed ID: 19531394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visualization and GPU-accelerated simulation of medical ultrasound from CT images.
    Kutter O; Shams R; Navab N
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2009 Jun; 94(3):250-66. PubMed ID: 19249113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tiny a priori knowledge solves the interior problem in computed tomography.
    Kudo H; Courdurier M; Noo F; Defrise M
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 May; 53(9):2207-31. PubMed ID: 18401067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Advances in computed radiography systems and their physical imaging characteristics.
    Cowen AR; Davies AG; Kengyelics SM
    Clin Radiol; 2007 Dec; 62(12):1132-41. PubMed ID: 17981160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Introducing DeBRa: a detailed breast model for radiological studies.
    Ma AK; Gunn S; Darambara DG
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jul; 54(14):4533-45. PubMed ID: 19556683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.