These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
517 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17135062)
1. Hypnotic depth and response to suggestion under standardized conditions and during FMRI scanning. Oakley DA; Deeley Q; Halligan PW Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2007 Jan; 55(1):32-58. PubMed ID: 17135062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fibromyalgia pain and its modulation by hypnotic and non-hypnotic suggestion: an fMRI analysis. Derbyshire SW; Whalley MG; Oakley DA Eur J Pain; 2009 May; 13(5):542-50. PubMed ID: 18653363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Imaging of hypnosis with functional magnetic resonance]. Aleksandrowicz JW; Urbanik A; Binder M Psychiatr Pol; 2006; 40(5):969-83. PubMed ID: 17217239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Neuroimaging resolution of the altered state hypothesis. Mazzoni G; Venneri A; McGeown WJ; Kirsch I Cortex; 2013 Feb; 49(2):400-10. PubMed ID: 23026758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does 'hypnosis' by any other name smell as sweet? The efficacy of 'hypnotic' inductions depends on the label 'hypnosis'. Gandhi B; Oakley DA Conscious Cogn; 2005 Jun; 14(2):304-15. PubMed ID: 15950884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does neuroimaging of suggestion elucidate hypnotic trance? Raz A Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2011 Jul; 59(3):363-77. PubMed ID: 21644126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. "How deeply hypnotized did i get?" Predicting self-reported hypnotic depth from a phenomenological assessment instrument. Pekala RJ; Kumar VK; Maurer R; Elliott-Carter NC; Moon E Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2006 Jul; 54(3):316-39. PubMed ID: 16858905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Durability of "posthypnotic suggestions" as a function of type of suggestion and trance depth. Berrigan LP; Kurtz RM; Stabile JP; Strube MJ Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1991 Jan; 39(1):24-38. PubMed ID: 2001895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Suggested visual hallucination without hypnosis enhances activity in visual areas of the brain. McGeown WJ; Venneri A; Kirsch I; Nocetti L; Roberts K; Foan L; Mazzoni G Conscious Cogn; 2012 Mar; 21(1):100-16. PubMed ID: 22123187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of overt and subjective responses to the Carleton University Responsiveness to Suggestion Scale and the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale under conditions of group administration. Spanos NP; Salas J; Menary EP; Brett PJ Psychol Rep; 1986 Jun; 58(3):847-56. PubMed ID: 3726039 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of "deepening" techniques on hypnotic depth and responding. Page RA; Handley GW Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1992 Jul; 40(3):157-68. PubMed ID: 1399153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Role of relaxation and specific suggestions in hypnotic emotional numbing. Sebastiani L; D'Alessandro L; Menicucci D; Ghelarducci B; Santarcangelo EL Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Jan; 63(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 17141344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hypnosis decouples cognitive control from conflict monitoring processes of the frontal lobe. Egner T; Jamieson G; Gruzelier J Neuroimage; 2005 Oct; 27(4):969-78. PubMed ID: 15964211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cognitive strategies in hypnosis: toward resolving the hypnotic conflict. Bartis SP; Zamansky HS Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1990 Jul; 38(3):168-82. PubMed ID: 2394534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The phenomenology of the experiences and the depth of hypnosis: comparison of direct and indirect induction techniques. Szabó C Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1993 Jul; 41(3):225-33. PubMed ID: 8335421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Imagination and dissociation in hypnotic responding. Bowers KS Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1992 Oct; 40(4):253-75. PubMed ID: 1468834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Not all group hypnotic suggestibility scales are created equal: individual differences in behavioral and subjective responses. Barnes SM; Lynn SJ; Pekala RJ Conscious Cogn; 2009 Mar; 18(1):255-65. PubMed ID: 18778955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Responsiveness to direct versus indirect hypnotic procedures: the role of resistance as a predictor variable. Groth-Marnat G; Mitchell K Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1998 Oct; 46(4):324-33. PubMed ID: 9780524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]