These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17135222)

  • 1. Impact of blood pressure on the Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of aortic stenosis.
    Little SH; Chan KL; Burwash IG
    Heart; 2007 Jul; 93(7):848-55. PubMed ID: 17135222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of concomitant mitral regurgitation on transvalvular gradient and flow in severe aortic stenosis: a systematic ex vivo analysis of a subentity of low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis.
    Katte F; Franz M; Jung C; Figulla HR; Leistner D; Jakob P; Stähli BE; Kretzschmar D; Lauten A
    EuroIntervention; 2018 Feb; 13(14):1635-1644. PubMed ID: 28994654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hemodynamic stability of valve area, valve resistance, and stroke work loss in aortic stenosis: a comparative analysis.
    Burwash IG; Hay KM; Chan KL
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2002 Aug; 15(8):814-22. PubMed ID: 12174351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Flow dependence of measures of aortic stenosis severity during exercise.
    Burwash IG; Pearlman AS; Kraft CD; Miyake-Hull C; Healy NL; Otto CM
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Nov; 24(5):1342-50. PubMed ID: 7930259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of systemic hypertension on the assessment of aortic stenosis.
    Kadem L; Dumesnil JG; Rieu R; Durand LG; Garcia D; Pibarot P
    Heart; 2005 Mar; 91(3):354-61. PubMed ID: 15710719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of conventional and simplified methods to calculate projected valve area at normal flow rate in patients with low flow, low gradient aortic stenosis: the multicenter TOPAS (True or Pseudo Severe Aortic Stenosis) study.
    Clavel MA; Burwash IG; Mundigler G; Dumesnil JG; Baumgartner H; Bergler-Klein J; Sénéchal M; Mathieu P; Couture C; Beanlands R; Pibarot P
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2010 Apr; 23(4):380-6. PubMed ID: 20362927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of aortic stenosis severity: role of contrast echocardiography in comparison with conventional echocardiography and cardiac catheterization.
    Almeida AG; Sargento L; Gabriel HM; da Costa JM; Morais J; Madeira F; David C; Oliveira J; da Cunha JC; Vagueiro MC
    Rev Port Cardiol; 2002 May; 21(5):555-72. PubMed ID: 12174519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Value and limitations of aortic valve resistance with particular consideration of low flow-low gradient aortic stenosis: an in vitro study.
    Mascherbauer J; Schima H; Rosenhek R; Czerny M; Maurer G; Baumgartner H
    Eur Heart J; 2004 May; 25(9):787-93. PubMed ID: 15120890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The complex nature of discordant severe calcified aortic valve disease grading: new insights from combined Doppler echocardiographic and computed tomographic study.
    Clavel MA; Messika-Zeitoun D; Pibarot P; Aggarwal SR; Malouf J; Araoz PA; Michelena HI; Cueff C; Larose E; Capoulade R; Vahanian A; Enriquez-Sarano M
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Dec; 62(24):2329-38. PubMed ID: 24076528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Aortic valve area discrepancy by Gorlin equation and Doppler echocardiography continuity equation: relationship to flow in patients with valvular aortic stenosis.
    Burwash IG; Dickinson A; Teskey RJ; Tam JW; Chan KL
    Can J Cardiol; 2000 Aug; 16(8):985-92. PubMed ID: 10978934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Doppler echocardiographic assessment of hemodynamic progression of valvular aortic stenosis over time: comparison between aortic valve resistance and valve area.
    Faggiano P; Gualeni A; Antonini-Canterin F; Rusconi C; Nicolosi G
    G Ital Cardiol; 1999 Oct; 29(10):1131-6. PubMed ID: 10546122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationship between cutoff values of peak aortic valve velocity and those of other Doppler echocardiographic parameters of severity in patients with aortic stenosis and normal flow.
    Castel AL; Maréchaux S; Laaouaj J; Rusinaru D; Levy F; Tribouilloy C
    Echocardiography; 2012 Nov; 29(10):1150-6. PubMed ID: 22862297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In-vivo analysis of the instantaneous transvalvular pressure difference-flow relationship in aortic valve stenosis: implications of unsteady fluid-dynamics for the clinical assessment of disease severity.
    Bermejo J; Antoranz JC; Burwash IG; Alvarez JL; Moreno M; García-Fernández MA; Otto CM
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Jul; 11(4):557-66. PubMed ID: 12150306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contrast agent increases Doppler velocities and improves reproducibility of aortic valve area measurements in patients with aortic stenosis.
    Smith LA; Cowell SJ; White AC; Boon NA; Newby DE; Northridge DB
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2004 Mar; 17(3):247-52. PubMed ID: 14981423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inconsistencies of echocardiographic criteria for the grading of aortic valve stenosis.
    Minners J; Allgeier M; Gohlke-Baerwolf C; Kienzle RP; Neumann FJ; Jander N
    Eur Heart J; 2008 Apr; 29(8):1043-8. PubMed ID: 18156619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Value and limitations of peak-to-peak gradient for evaluation of aortic stenosis.
    Kadem L; Garcia D; Durand LG; Rieu R; Dumesnil JG; Pibarot P
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Sep; 15(5):609-16. PubMed ID: 17044364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Discrepancies between catheter and Doppler estimates of aortic stenosis: the role of pressure recovery evaluated 'in vivo'.
    Razzolini R; Manica A; Tarantini G; Ramondo A; Napodano M; Iliceto S
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2007 May; 16(3):225-9. PubMed ID: 17578039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Noninvasive quantification and classification of the severity of aortic stenosis using Doppler echocardiography].
    Schmalz A; Erbel R; Wittlich N; Mohr-Kahaly S; Meyer J
    Z Kardiol; 1992 Nov; 81(11):619-26. PubMed ID: 1471399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Progression of Low-Gradient, Low-Flow, Severe Aortic Stenosis With Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.
    Tribouilloy C; Rusinaru D; Charles V; Boulif J; Maes F; Lévy F; Pasquet A; Maréchaux S; Vanoverschelde JL
    Am J Cardiol; 2015 Aug; 116(4):612-7. PubMed ID: 26089012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Longitudinal left ventricular contractile dysfunction after exercise in aortic stenosis.
    Van Pelt NC; Stewart RA; Legget ME; Whalley GA; Wong SP; Zeng I; Oldfield M; Kerr AJ
    Heart; 2007 Jun; 93(6):732-8. PubMed ID: 17090563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.