These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
394 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17135554)
1. Dermal mast cell counts in F2 Holstein x Gir crossbred cattle artificially infested with the tick Boophilus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae). Engracia Filho JR; Bechara GH; Teodoro RL Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2006 Oct; 1081():476-8. PubMed ID: 17135554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of BoLA class II microsatellites in cattle infested with Boophilus microplus ticks: class II is probably associated with susceptibility. Acosta-Rodríguez R; Alonso-Morales R; Balladares S; Flores-Aguilar H; García-Vazquez Z; Gorodezky C Vet Parasitol; 2005 Feb; 127(3-4):313-21. PubMed ID: 15710532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inhibition and recovery of tick functions in cattle repeatedly infested with Boophilus microplus. Barriga OO; da Silva SS; Azevedo JS J Parasitol; 1993 Oct; 79(5):710-5. PubMed ID: 8410542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Boophilus microplus: the pattern of bovine immunoglobulin isotype responses to high and low tick infestations. Kashino SS; Resende J; Sacco AM; Rocha C; Proença L; Carvalho WA; Firmino AA; Queiroz R; Benavides M; Gershwin LJ; De Miranda Santos IK Exp Parasitol; 2005 May; 110(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 15804374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Resistance to Boophilus microplus (Canestrini) in genetically different types of calves in early life. O'Kelly JC; Spiers WG J Parasitol; 1976 Apr; 62(2):312-7. PubMed ID: 1263044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modulation of cutaneous inflammation induced by ticks in contrasting phenotypes of infestation in bovines. Carvalho WA; Franzin AM; Abatepaulo AR; de Oliveira CJ; Moré DD; da Silva JS; Ferreira BR; de Miranda Santos IK Vet Parasitol; 2010 Feb; 167(2-4):260-73. PubMed ID: 19836891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cellular response in the tick feeding site in crossbred cattle artificially infested by Rhipicephalus microplus. Engracia Filho JR; Araújo CD; Pinto GN; Mendes YH; Bechara GH Exp Appl Acarol; 2017 Jun; 72(2):171-178. PubMed ID: 28597313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Levels of natural resistance to Boophilus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae) in Carora breed bulls. Meléndez RD; Coronado A; Mujica F; Cerutti F; Mosquera O Rev Biol Trop; 1998 Sep; 46(3):691-6. PubMed ID: 10347818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Gene expression in the skin of Bos taurus and Bos indicus cattle infested with the cattle tick, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus. Piper EK; Jackson LA; Bagnall NH; Kongsuwan KK; Lew AE; Jonsson NN Vet Immunol Immunopathol; 2008 Nov; 126(1-2):110-9. PubMed ID: 18676027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Immunologic relations between cattle and ticks, specifically between cattle and Boophilus microplus]. Brossard M Acta Trop; 1976; 33(1):15-36. PubMed ID: 13630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Poor inheritance of low attractiveness for Amblyomma variegatum in cattle. Stachurski F Vet Parasitol; 2007 May; 146(3-4):321-8. PubMed ID: 17418491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Immune and biochemical responses in skin differ between bovine hosts genetically susceptible and resistant to the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus. Franzin AM; Maruyama SR; Garcia GR; Oliveira RP; Ribeiro JM; Bishop R; Maia AA; Moré DD; Ferreira BR; Santos IK Parasit Vectors; 2017 Jan; 10(1):51. PubMed ID: 28143523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Local immune response against larvae of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus in Bos taurus indicus and Bos taurus taurus cattle. Constantinoiu CC; Jackson LA; Jorgensen WK; Lew-Tabor AE; Piper EK; Mayer DG; Venus B; Jonsson NN Int J Parasitol; 2010 Jun; 40(7):865-75. PubMed ID: 20109460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of the effect of two regimens of infestation on the development of resistance by cattle to the cattle tick, Boophilus microplus (Can.). Hewetson RW; Lewis IJ J Parasitol; 1976 Apr; 62(2):307-11. PubMed ID: 944256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the differential regulation of T and B-lymphocyte subsets in the skin and lymph nodes amongst three cattle breeds as potential mediators of immune-resistance to Rhipicephalus microplus. Robbertse L; Richards SA; Clift SJ; Barnard AC; Leisewitz A; Crafford JE; Maritz-Olivier C Ticks Tick Borne Dis; 2018 May; 9(4):976-987. PubMed ID: 29622516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relationship between the resistance of crossbred cattle to ticks, Boophilus microplus (Canestrini, 1887) and Hyalomma anatolicum anatolicum (Koch, 1844). Miranpuri GS Vet Parasitol; 1989 Jun; 31(3-4):289-301. PubMed ID: 2763448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breed-associated resistance to tick infestation in Bos indicus and their crosses with Bos taurus. Wambura PN; Gwakisa PS; Silayo RS; Rugaimukamu EA Vet Parasitol; 1998 May; 77(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 9652384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tick-susceptible Bos taurus cattle display an increased cellular response at the site of larval Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus attachment, compared with tick-resistant Bos indicus cattle. Piper EK; Jackson LA; Bielefeldt-Ohmann H; Gondro C; Lew-Tabor AE; Jonsson NN Int J Parasitol; 2010 Mar; 40(4):431-41. PubMed ID: 19852965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The productivity effects of cattle tick (Boophilus microplus) infestation on cattle, with particular reference to Bos indicus cattle and their crosses. Jonsson NN Vet Parasitol; 2006 Apr; 137(1-2):1-10. PubMed ID: 16472920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]