These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17135778)

  • 1. Pitfalls with MRI evaluation of prostate cancer detection: comparison of findings with histopathological assessment of retropubic radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Okamura T; Umemoto Y; Yamashita K; Suzuki S; Shirai T; Hashimoto Y; Kohri K
    Urol Int; 2006; 77(4):301-6. PubMed ID: 17135778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of prostate transition-zone cancer.
    Yoshizako T; Wada A; Hayashi T; Uchida K; Sumura M; Uchida N; Kitagaki H; Igawa M
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Dec; 49(10):1207-13. PubMed ID: 19031184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prostate cancer detection by prebiopsy 3.0-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging.
    Nishida S; Kinoshita H; Mishima T; Kurokawa H; Sakaida N; Matsuda T
    Int J Urol; 2011 Sep; 18(9):653-8. PubMed ID: 21790792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MRI of the prostate: interobserver agreement compared with histopathologic outcome after radical prostatectomy.
    Ruprecht O; Weisser P; Bodelle B; Ackermann H; Vogl TJ
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Mar; 81(3):456-60. PubMed ID: 21354732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Phased array magnetic resonance imaging for staging clinically localised prostrate cancer.
    Borre M; Lundorf E; Marcussen N; Langkilde NC; Wolf H
    Acta Oncol; 2005; 44(6):589-92. PubMed ID: 16294442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tumorsize dependent detection rate of endorectal MRI of prostate cancer--a histopathologic correlation with whole-mount sections in 70 patients with prostate cancer.
    Roethke MC; Lichy MP; Jurgschat L; Hennenlotter J; Vogel U; Schilling D; Stenzl A; Claussen CD; Schlemmer HP
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Aug; 79(2):189-95. PubMed ID: 20227209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dynamic contrast-enhanced-magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of intraprostatic prostate cancer: correlation with radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Puech P; Potiron E; Lemaitre L; Leroy X; Haber GP; Crouzet S; Kamoi K; Villers A
    Urology; 2009 Nov; 74(5):1094-9. PubMed ID: 19773038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prostate cancer: 1HMRS-DCEMR at 3T versus [(18)F]choline PET/CT in the detection of local prostate cancer recurrence in men with biochemical progression after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP).
    Panebianco V; Sciarra A; Lisi D; Galati F; Buonocore V; Catalano C; Gentile V; Laghi A; Passariello R
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Apr; 81(4):700-8. PubMed ID: 21330082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prediction of extraprostatic cancer by prostate specific antigen density, endorectal MRI, and biopsy Gleason score in clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Horiguchi A; Nakashima J; Horiguchi Y; Nakagawa K; Oya M; Ohigashi T; Marumo K; Murai M
    Prostate; 2003 Jun; 56(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 12746843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Topographical sensitivity and specificity of endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer detection.
    Colleselli D; Schilling D; Lichy MP; Hennenlotter J; Vogel UH; Krueger SA; Kuehs U; Schlemmer HP; Stenzl A; Schwentner C
    Urol Int; 2010; 84(4):388-94. PubMed ID: 20332606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Usefulness of MRI prior to prostate needle biopsy in PSA gray zone].
    Sakura Y; Mishina M; Masui K; Masuda N; Katoh T; Ito H; Yoshida T; Soma T; Dodo T; Nakajima S; Ito T; Okuno H
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 2011 Oct; 57(10):545-9. PubMed ID: 22089151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Localising prostate cancer: comparison of endorectal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and 3D-MR spectroscopic imaging with transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy.
    Goris Gbenou MC; Peltier A; Addla SK; Lemort M; Bollens R; Larsimont D; Roumeguère T; Schulman CC; van Velthoven R
    Urol Int; 2012; 88(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 22004874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High-resolution MRI of excised human prostate specimens acquired with 9.4T in detection and identification of cancers: validation of a technique.
    Fan X; Haney CR; Agrawal G; Pelizzari CA; Antic T; Eggener SE; Sethi I; River JN; Zamora M; Karczmar GS; Oto A
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Oct; 34(4):956-61. PubMed ID: 21928309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relationship between systematic biopsies and histological features of 222 radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of prediction of tumor significance for men with nonpalpable prostate cancer.
    Noguchi M; Stamey TA; McNeal JE; Yemoto CM
    J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):104-9; discussion 109-10. PubMed ID: 11435833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Magnetic resonance with an endorectal coil and a fast spin echo sequence in the staging of prostatic carcinoma. The correlation with histopathological data].
    Masi A; Olmastroni M; Marin E; Consalvo M; Lascialfari L; Ricupero L; Nicita G; Villari D; Amorosi A; Villari N
    Radiol Med; 1997 Nov; 94(5):496-502. PubMed ID: 9465216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experience improves staging accuracy of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer: what is the learning curve?
    Latchamsetty KC; Borden LS; Porter CR; Lacrampe M; Vaughan M; Lin E; Conti N; Wright JL; Corman JM
    Can J Urol; 2007 Feb; 14(1):3429-34. PubMed ID: 17324322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) is a useful modality for the precise detection and staging of early prostate cancer.
    Hara N; Okuizumi M; Koike H; Kawaguchi M; Bilim V
    Prostate; 2005 Feb; 62(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 15389803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sextant localization of prostate cancer: comparison of sextant biopsy, magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging with step section histology.
    Wefer AE; Hricak H; Vigneron DB; Coakley FV; Lu Y; Wefer J; Mueller-Lisse U; Carroll PR; Kurhanewicz J
    J Urol; 2000 Aug; 164(2):400-4. PubMed ID: 10893595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Increasing the number of biopsies increases the concordance of Gleason scores of needle biopsies and prostatectomy specimens.
    Divrik RT; Eroglu A; Sahin A; Zorlu F; Ozen H
    Urol Oncol; 2007; 25(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 17826653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Magnetic resonance imaging of clinically localized prostatic cancer.
    Ikonen S; Kärkkäinen P; Kivisaari L; Salo JO; Taari K; Vehmas T; Tervahartiala P; Rannikko S
    J Urol; 1998 Mar; 159(3):915-9. PubMed ID: 9474182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.