These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17136147)
1. The use of wireless laptop computers for computer-assisted learning in pharmacokinetics. Munar MY; Singh H; Belle D; Brackett CC; Earle SB Am J Pharm Educ; 2006 Feb; 70(1):4. PubMed ID: 17136147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What do dental students think about mandatory laptop programs? Hendricson W; Eisenberg E; Guest G; Jones P; Johnson L; Panagakos F; McDonald J; Cintron L J Dent Educ; 2006 May; 70(5):480-99. PubMed ID: 16687633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A technology-enhanced patient case workshop. Pai VB; Kelley KA; Bellebaum KL Am J Pharm Educ; 2009 Aug; 73(5):86. PubMed ID: 19777101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Electronic curriculum implementation at North American dental schools. Hendricson WD; Panagakos F; Eisenberg E; McDonald J; Guest G; Jones P; Johnson L; Cintron L J Dent Educ; 2004 Oct; 68(10):1041-57. PubMed ID: 15466056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of a Secure Laptop-Based Testing Program in an Undergraduate Nursing Program: Students' Perspective. Tao J; Gunter G; Tsai MH; Lim D Comput Inform Nurs; 2016 Jan; 34(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 26389859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Integration of laptop computer technology into an undergraduate nursing course. Birx E; Castleberry K; Perry K Comput Nurs; 1996; 14(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 8904364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Should laptops be allowed in the classroom? Two viewpoints: viewpoint 1: laptops in classrooms facilitate curricular advancement and promote student learning and viewpoint 2: deconstructing and rethinking the use of laptops in the classroom. Spallek H; von Bergmann H J Dent Educ; 2014 Dec; 78(12):1580-8. PubMed ID: 25480272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computer-assisted instruction: a survey on the attitudes of osteopathic medical students. Forman LJ; Pomerantz SC J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2006 Sep; 106(9):571-8. PubMed ID: 17079528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of microcomputers on program excellence. Weiner EE; Emerson LA J Med Syst; 1986 Apr; 10(2):151-62. PubMed ID: 3528371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Effect of Banning Computers on Examination Performance in a First-Year Pathophysiology Class. Kennedy DR Am J Pharm Educ; 2019 Dec; 83(10):7535. PubMed ID: 32001887 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Short Communication: Perception and attitude of pharmacy students towards learning tools. Ali FR; Hassan F; Hasan SF; Israr F; Shafiq Y; Arshad HM Pak J Pharm Sci; 2015 Nov; 28(6):2185-9. PubMed ID: 26639486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer-based study strategies for students with learning disabilities: individual differences associated with adoption level. Anderson-Inman L; Knox-Quinn C; Horney MA J Learn Disabil; 1996 Sep; 29(5):461-84. PubMed ID: 8870517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing the Value of Online Learning and Social Media in Pharmacy Education. Hamilton LA; Franks A; Heidel RE; McDonough SL; Suda KJ Am J Pharm Educ; 2016 Aug; 80(6):97. PubMed ID: 27667834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mobile computing initiatives within pharmacy education. Cain J; Bird ER; Jones M Am J Pharm Educ; 2008 Aug; 72(4):76. PubMed ID: 19002276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interactive computer-assisted instruction in acid-base physiology for mobile computer platforms. Longmuir KJ Adv Physiol Educ; 2014 Mar; 38(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 24585467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can a tablet device alter undergraduate science students' study behavior and use of technology? Morris NP; Ramsay L; Chauhan V Adv Physiol Educ; 2012 Jun; 36(2):97-107. PubMed ID: 22665424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development of instructional, interactive, multimedia anatomy dissection software: a student-led initiative. Inwood MJ; Ahmad J Clin Anat; 2005 Nov; 18(8):613-7. PubMed ID: 16187304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance equivalency between computer-based and traditional pen-and-paper assessment: A case study in clinical anatomy. GuimarĂ£es B; Ribeiro J; Cruz B; Ferreira A; Alves H; Cruz-Correia R; Madeira MD; Ferreira MA Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Mar; 11(2):124-136. PubMed ID: 28817229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Electronic integration of prerequisite course content. Alsharif NZ; Henriksen B Am J Pharm Educ; 2009 Dec; 73(8):150. PubMed ID: 20221343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of the effects of student response systems on student learning and attitudes over a broad range of biology courses. Preszler RW; Dawe A; Shuster CB; Shuster M CBE Life Sci Educ; 2007; 6(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 17339392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]