These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17136415)

  • 1. [Discrimination of musical pitch with cochlear implants].
    Haumann S; Mühler R; Ziese M; von Specht H
    HNO; 2007 Aug; 55(8):613-9. PubMed ID: 17136415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Training of cochlear implant users to improve pitch perception in the presence of competing place cues.
    Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):e1-e13. PubMed ID: 25329372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Examination of spectral timbre cues and musical instrument identification in cochlear implant recipients.
    Meister H; Landwehr M; Lang-Roth R; Streicher B; Walger M
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 Mar; 15(2):78-86. PubMed ID: 24597635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Musical pitch discrimination by cochlear implant users.
    Ping L; Yuan M; Feng H
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2012 May; 121(5):328-36. PubMed ID: 22724279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A cochlear implant user with exceptional musical hearing ability.
    Maarefvand M; Marozeau J; Blamey PJ
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 52(6):424-32. PubMed ID: 23509878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The MuSIC perception test: a novel battery for testing music perception of cochlear implant users.
    Brockmeier SJ; Fitzgerald D; Searle O; Fitzgerald H; Grasmeder M; Hilbig S; Vermiere K; Peterreins M; Heydner S; Arnold W
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2011 Feb; 12(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 21756454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users.
    Looi V; McDermott H; McKay C; Hickson L
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):421-34. PubMed ID: 18344870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The music quality feeling and music perception of adult cochlear implant recipients].
    Zhou Q; Gu X; Liu B
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 33(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 30669198
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Music perception in adult cochlear implant recipients.
    Leal MC; Shin YJ; Laborde ML; Calmels MN; Verges S; Lugardon S; Andrieu S; Deguine O; Fraysse B
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2003 Sep; 123(7):826-35. PubMed ID: 14575398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perception of musical timbre by cochlear implant listeners: a multidimensional scaling study.
    Macherey O; Delpierre A
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):426-36. PubMed ID: 23334356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Randomized Controlled Crossover Study of the Impact of Online Music Training on Pitch and Timbre Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Jiam NT; Deroche ML; Jiradejvong P; Limb CJ
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2019 Jun; 20(3):247-262. PubMed ID: 30815761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical assessment of music perception in Korean cochlear implant listeners.
    Jung KH; Cho YS; Cho JK; Park GY; Kim EY; Hong SH; Chung WH; Won JH; Rubinstein JT
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2010 Jun; 130(6):716-23. PubMed ID: 19958251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mismatch negativity (MMN) objectively reflects timbre discrimination thresholds in normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.
    Rahne T; Plontke SK; Wagner L
    Brain Res; 2014 Oct; 1586():143-51. PubMed ID: 25152464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impaired perception of temporal fine structure and musical timbre in cochlear implant users.
    Heng J; Cantarero G; Elhilali M; Limb CJ
    Hear Res; 2011 Oct; 280(1-2):192-200. PubMed ID: 21664263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of instrument timbre on melodic contour identification by cochlear implant users.
    Galvin JJ; Fu QJ; Oba S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):EL189-95. PubMed ID: 19062785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The family oriented musical training for children with cochlear implants: speech and musical perception results of two year follow-up.
    Yucel E; Sennaroglu G; Belgin E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Jul; 73(7):1043-52. PubMed ID: 19411117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of a Test Battery to Assess Perception of Music in Children With Cochlear Implants.
    Roy AT; Scattergood-Keepper L; Carver C; Jiradejvong P; Butler C; Limb CJ
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2014 Jun; 140(6):540-7. PubMed ID: 24722833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. From TEMPO+ to OPUS 2: what can music tests tell us about processor upgrades?
    van Besouw RM; Grasmeder ML
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2011 Aug; 12 Suppl 2():S40-3. PubMed ID: 21917218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pitch discrimination is better for synthetic timbre than natural musical instrument timbres despite familiarity.
    Holmes E; Kinghorn EE; McGarry LM; Busari E; Griffiths TD; Johnsrude IS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Jul; 152(1):31. PubMed ID: 35931555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Musical Sound Quality in Cochlear Implant Users: A Comparison in Bass Frequency Perception Between Fine Structure Processing and High-Definition Continuous Interleaved Sampling Strategies.
    Roy AT; Carver C; Jiradejvong P; Limb CJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):582-90. PubMed ID: 25906173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.