154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17136486)
1. A study of the long-term precision of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone densitometers and implications for the validity of the least-significant-change calculation.
Hangartner TN
Osteoporos Int; 2007 Apr; 18(4):513-23. PubMed ID: 17136486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy and precision of 62 bone densitometers using a European Spine Phantom.
Kolta S; Ravaud P; Fechtenbaum J; Dougados M; Roux C
Osteoporos Int; 1999; 10(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 10501774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of phantoms for cross-calibration of lumbar spine DXA.
Pearson D; Cawte SA; Green DJ
Osteoporos Int; 2002 Dec; 13(12):948-54. PubMed ID: 12459937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of BMD precision for Prodigy and Delphi spine and femur scans.
Shepherd JA; Fan B; Lu Y; Lewiecki EM; Miller P; Genant HK
Osteoporos Int; 2006; 17(9):1303-8. PubMed ID: 16823544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Correcting the magnification error of fan beam densitometers.
Griffiths MR; Noakes KA; Pocock NA
J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Jan; 12(1):119-23. PubMed ID: 9240734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Instrument performance in bone density testing at five Australian centres.
Khan KM; Henzell SL; Broderick C; Prince RL; Saul A; Lomman J; Wark JD
Aust N Z J Med; 1997 Oct; 27(5):526-30. PubMed ID: 9404582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Universal standardization for dual x-ray absorptiometry: patient and phantom cross-calibration results.
Genant HK; Grampp S; Glüer CC; Faulkner KG; Jergas M; Engelke K; Hagiwara S; Van Kuijk C
J Bone Miner Res; 1994 Oct; 9(10):1503-14. PubMed ID: 7817795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cross-calibration, precision and patient dose measurements in preparation for clinical trials using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine.
Cawte SA; Pearson D; Green DJ; Maslanka WB; Miller CG; Rogers AT
Br J Radiol; 1999 Apr; 72(856):354-62. PubMed ID: 10474496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development of a phantom for morphometric X-ray absorptiometry.
Rea JA; Blake GM; Fogelman I
Br J Radiol; 2001 Apr; 74(880):341-50. PubMed ID: 11387153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Gender disparity in BMD conversion: a comparison between Lunar and Hologic densitometers.
Ganda K; Nguyen TV; Pocock N
Arch Osteoporos; 2014; 9():180. PubMed ID: 25527404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A multinational study to develop universal standardization of whole-body bone density and composition using GE Healthcare Lunar and Hologic DXA systems.
Shepherd JA; Fan B; Lu Y; Wu XP; Wacker WK; Ergun DL; Levine MA
J Bone Miner Res; 2012 Oct; 27(10):2208-16. PubMed ID: 22623101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The long-term performance of DXA bone densitometers.
Wells J; Ryan PJ
Br J Radiol; 2000 Jul; 73(871):737-9. PubMed ID: 11089465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A generalized least significant change for individuals measured on different DXA systems.
Shepherd JA; Lu Y
J Clin Densitom; 2007; 10(3):249-58. PubMed ID: 17616413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of room temperature on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Culton NL; Pocock NA
Osteoporos Int; 2003 Apr; 14(2):137-40. PubMed ID: 12730777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: cross-calibration of a new fan-beam system.
Blake GM; Harrison EJ; Adams JE
Calcif Tissue Int; 2004 Jul; 75(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 15037973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Some physical and clinical factors influencing the measurement of precision error, least significant change, and bone mineral density in dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.
Frimeth J; Galiano E; Webster D
J Clin Densitom; 2010; 13(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 19932980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pediatric in vivo cross-calibration between the GE Lunar Prodigy and DPX-L bone densitometers.
Crabtree NJ; Shaw NJ; Boivin CM; Oldroyd B; Truscott JG
Osteoporos Int; 2005 Dec; 16(12):2157-67. PubMed ID: 16234997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of a new body composition phantom for quality control and cross-calibration of DXA devices.
Diessel E; Fuerst T; Njeh CF; Tylavsky F; Cauley J; Dockrell M; Genant HK
J Appl Physiol (1985); 2000 Aug; 89(2):599-605. PubMed ID: 10926643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cross calibration of DXA as part of an equipment replacement program.
Pearson D; Horton B; Green DJ
J Clin Densitom; 2006; 9(3):287-94. PubMed ID: 16931346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Standardization of spine and hip BMD measurements in different DXA devices.
Ozdemir A; Uçar M
Eur J Radiol; 2007 Jun; 62(3):423-6. PubMed ID: 17289322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
