These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17136625)

  • 1. Different actuarial risk measures produce different risk rankings for sexual offenders.
    Barbaree HE; Langton CM; Peacock EJ
    Sex Abuse; 2006 Oct; 18(4):423-40. PubMed ID: 17136625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A multisite comparison of actuarial risk instruments for sex offenders.
    Harris GT; Rice ME; Quinsey VL; Lalumière ML; Boer D; Lang C
    Psychol Assess; 2003 Sep; 15(3):413-25. PubMed ID: 14593842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The factor structure of static actuarial items: its relation to prediction.
    Barbaree HE; Langton CM; Peacock EJ
    Sex Abuse; 2006 Apr; 18(2):207-26. PubMed ID: 16937082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of two risk assessment instruments for sexual offenders.
    Looman J
    Sex Abuse; 2006 Apr; 18(2):193-206. PubMed ID: 16598660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the SORAG and the Static-99 on Belgian sex offenders committed to a forensic facility.
    Ducro C; Pham T
    Sex Abuse; 2006 Jan; 18(1):15-26. PubMed ID: 16598662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differences in the predictive validity of actuarial risk assessments in relation to sex offender type.
    Bartosh DL; Garby T; Lewis D; Gray S
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2003 Aug; 47(4):422-38. PubMed ID: 12971183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Actuarial risk assessment of sexual offenders: The psychometric properties of the Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide (SORAG).
    Rettenberger M; Rice ME; Harris GT; Eher R
    Psychol Assess; 2017 Jun; 29(6):624-638. PubMed ID: 28594206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of actuarial procedures for assessment of sexual offender recidivism risk may vary across ethnicity.
    Långström N
    Sex Abuse; 2004 Apr; 16(2):107-20. PubMed ID: 15208896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Substance abuse among high-risk sexual offenders: do measures of lifetime history of substance abuse add to the prediction of recidivism over actuarial risk assessment instruments?
    Looman J; Abracen J
    J Interpers Violence; 2011 Mar; 26(4):683-700. PubMed ID: 20587448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide (SORAG)].
    Rossegger A; Gerth J; Urbaniok F; Laubacher A; Endrass J
    Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr; 2010 Nov; 78(11):658-67. PubMed ID: 21069631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recent research (N = 9,305) underscores the importance of using age-stratified actuarial tables in sex offender risk assessments.
    Wollert R; Cramer E; Waggoner J; Skelton A; Vess J
    Sex Abuse; 2010 Dec; 22(4):471-90. PubMed ID: 21098823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of modified versions of the Static-99 and the Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide.
    Nunes KL; Firestone P; Bradford JM; Greenberg DM; Broom I
    Sex Abuse; 2002 Jul; 14(3):253-69. PubMed ID: 12087686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interpreting multiple risk scales for sex offenders: evidence for averaging.
    Lehmann RJ; Hanson RK; Babchishin KM; Gallasch-Nemitz F; Biedermann J; Dahle KP
    Psychol Assess; 2013 Sep; 25(3):1019-24. PubMed ID: 23730829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sexual reconviction rates in the United Kingdom and actuarial risk estimates.
    Craig LA; Browne KD; Stringer I; Hogue TE
    Child Abuse Negl; 2008 Jan; 32(1):121-38. PubMed ID: 18155765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does consideration of psychopathy and sexual deviance add to the predictive validity of the static-99R?
    Looman J; Morphett NA; Abracen J
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2013 Aug; 57(8):939-65. PubMed ID: 22641857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Another look at interpreting risk categories.
    Mossman D
    Sex Abuse; 2006 Jan; 18(1):41-63. PubMed ID: 16639536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The significance of offending behavior for predicting sexual recidivism among sex offenders of various age groups.
    Janka C; Gallasch-Nemitz F; Biedermann J; Dahle KP
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2012; 35(3):159-64. PubMed ID: 22425764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Developmental risk factors for sexual offending.
    Lee JK; Jackson HJ; Pattison P; Ward T
    Child Abuse Negl; 2002 Jan; 26(1):73-92. PubMed ID: 11865823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does Static-99 predict recidivism among older sexual offenders?
    Hanson RK
    Sex Abuse; 2006 Oct; 18(4):343-55. PubMed ID: 17136627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predictive validity of the SVR-20 and Static-99 in a Dutch sample of treated sex offenders.
    de Vogel V; de Ruiter C; van Beek D; Mead G
    Law Hum Behav; 2004 Jun; 28(3):235-51. PubMed ID: 15264445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.