These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17139687)
1. Two-year clinical outcome after coronary stenting of small vessels using 2.25-mm sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents: insight into the RESEARCH and T-SEARCH registries. Tanimoto S; Daemen J; Tsuchida K; García-García HM; de Jaegere P; van Domburg RT; Serruys PW Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2007 Jan; 69(1):94-103. PubMed ID: 17139687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sirolimus-eluting stent showed better one-year outcomes than paclitaxel-eluting stent in a real life setting of coronary intervention in Koreans. Suh JW; Park JS; Cho HJ; Kim MS; Kang HJ; Cho YS; Koo BK; Chung WY; Youn TJ; Chae IH; Choi DJ; Kim HS; Sohn DW; Oh BH; Park YB Int J Cardiol; 2007 Apr; 117(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 17292498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The unrestricted use of paclitaxel- versus sirolimus-eluting stents for coronary artery disease in an unselected population: one-year results of the Taxus-Stent Evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (T-SEARCH) registry. Ong AT; Serruys PW; Aoki J; Hoye A; van Mieghem CA; Rodriguez-Granillo GA; Valgimigli M; Sonnenschein K; Regar E; van der Ent M; de Jaegere PP; McFadden EP; Sianos G; van der Giessen WJ; de Feyter PJ; van Domburg RT J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Apr; 45(7):1135-41. PubMed ID: 15808774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Drug-eluting stent for the treatment of small coronary lesion: comparison between sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stent. Li JJ; Xu B; Yang YJ; Chen JL; Qiao SB; Ma WH; Qin XW; Yao M; Liu HB; Wu YJ; Yuan JQ; Chen J; You SJ; Dai J; Xia R; Gao RL Chin Med J (Engl); 2007 Apr; 120(7):569-73. PubMed ID: 17442204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Four-year clinical outcome of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents compared to bare-metal stents for the percutaneous treatment of stable coronary artery disease. Simsek C; Onuma Y; Magro M; de Boer S; Battes L; van Domburg RT; Boersma E; Serruys PW; Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Jul; 76(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 20310019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of three-year clinical outcome of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents versus bare metal stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (from the RESEARCH and T-SEARCH Registries). Daemen J; Tanimoto S; García-García HM; Kukreja N; van de Sande M; Sianos G; de Jaegere PP; van Domburg RT; Serruys PW Am J Cardiol; 2007 Apr; 99(8):1027-32. PubMed ID: 17437722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of sirolimus-eluting stent, paclitaxel-eluting stent, and bare metal stent in the treatment of long coronary lesions. Kim YH; Park SW; Lee CW; Hong MK; Gwon HC; Jang Y; Lee MM; Koo BK; Oh DJ; Seung KB; Tahk SJ; Yoon J; Park SJ Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2006 Feb; 67(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 16400663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative clinical outcomes of paclitaxel- and sirolimus-eluting stents: results from a large prospective multicenter registry--STENT Group. Simonton CA; Brodie B; Cheek B; Krainin F; Metzger C; Hermiller J; Juk S; Duffy P; Humphrey A; Nussbaum M; Laurent S; J Am Coll Cardiol; 2007 Sep; 50(13):1214-22. PubMed ID: 17888837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical outcomes for sirolimus-eluting stents and polymer-coated paclitaxel-eluting stents in daily practice: results from a large multicenter registry. Saia F; Piovaccari G; Manari A; Santarelli A; Benassi A; Aurier E; Sangiorgio P; Tarantino F; Geraci G; Vecchi G; Guastaroba P; Grilli R; Marzocchi A J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 Oct; 48(7):1312-8. PubMed ID: 17010788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term clinical outcomes of sirolimus- versus paclitaxel-eluting stents for patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease: analysis of the MAIN-COMPARE (revascularization for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis: comparison of percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus surgical revascularization) registry. Lee JY; Park DW; Yun SC; Lee SW; Kim YH; Lee CW; Hong MK; Park SW; Park SJ J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 Aug; 54(9):853-9. PubMed ID: 19695467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Outcome in the real-world of coronary high-risk intervention with drug-eluting stents (ORCHID) -- a single-center study comparing Cypher sirolimus-eluting with Taxus paclitaxel-eluting stents. Kumar S; Suresh V; Prendergast BD; Brooks NH; Wicks P; Levy RD; Ray SG; Bennett DH; Lee HS Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2006 Nov; 68(5):663-8. PubMed ID: 17034063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term safety and efficacy of drug-eluting stents: two-year results of the REAL (REgistro AngiopLastiche dell'Emilia Romagna) multicenter registry. Marzocchi A; Saia F; Piovaccari G; Manari A; Aurier E; Benassi A; Cremonesi A; Percoco G; Varani E; Magnavacchi P; Guastaroba P; Grilli R; Maresta A Circulation; 2007 Jun; 115(25):3181-8. PubMed ID: 17562952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The everolimus-eluting stent in real-world patients: 6-month follow-up of the X-SEARCH (Xience V Stent Evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiac Hospital) registry. Onuma Y; Kukreja N; Piazza N; Eindhoven J; Girasis C; Schenkeveld L; van Domburg R; Serruys PW; J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 Jul; 54(3):269-76. PubMed ID: 19589442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of six-year clinical outcome of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents to bare-metal stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: an analysis of the RESEARCH (rapamycin-eluting stent evaluated at Rotterdam cardiology hospital) and T-SEARCH (taxus stent evaluated at Rotterdam cardiology hospital) registries. Simsek C; Magro M; Boersma E; Onuma Y; Nauta S; Daemen J; Gaspersz M; van Geuns RJ; van der Giessen W; van Domburg R; Serruys P J Invasive Cardiol; 2011 Aug; 23(8):336-41. PubMed ID: 21828397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparable clinical outcomes with paclitaxel- and sirolimus-eluting stents in unrestricted contemporary practice. Cosgrave J; Melzi G; Corbett S; Biondi-Zoccai GG; Agostoni P; Babic R; Airoldi F; Chieffo A; Sangiorgi GM; Montorfano M; Michev I; Carlino M; Colombo A J Am Coll Cardiol; 2007 Jun; 49(24):2320-8. PubMed ID: 17572247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of three or more sirolimus-eluting stents versus paclitaxel-eluting stents on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Chu WW; Kuchulakanti PK; Torguson R; Wang B; Clavijo LC; Suddath WO; Pichard AD; Satler LF; Kent KM; Waksman R Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2006 Jul; 68(1):62-6. PubMed ID: 16755592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of significant chronic kidney disease on long-term clinical outcomes after drug-eluting stent versus bare metal stent implantation. Jeong YH; Hong MK; Lee CW; Park DW; Kim YH; Kim JJ; Park SW; Park SJ Int J Cardiol; 2008 Mar; 125(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 17521753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sirolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation for the percutaneous treatment of left main coronary artery disease: a combined RESEARCH and T-SEARCH long-term analysis. Valgimigli M; Malagutti P; Aoki J; Garcia-Garcia HM; Rodriguez Granillo GA; van Mieghem CA; Ligthart JM; Ong AT; Sianos G; Regar E; Van Domburg RT; De Feyter P; de Jaegere P; Serruys PW J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 Feb; 47(3):507-14. PubMed ID: 16458128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Unrestricted utilization of sirolimus-eluting stents compared with conventional bare stent implantation in the "real world": the Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) registry. Lemos PA; Serruys PW; van Domburg RT; Saia F; Arampatzis CA; Hoye A; Degertekin M; Tanabe K; Daemen J; Liu TK; McFadden E; Sianos G; Hofma SH; Smits PC; van der Giessen WJ; de Feyter PJ Circulation; 2004 Jan; 109(2):190-5. PubMed ID: 14691037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]