235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17140446)
1. Analyzing the dose-dependence of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae global transcriptional response to methyl methanesulfonate and ionizing radiation.
Benton MG; Somasundaram S; Glasner JD; Palecek SP
BMC Genomics; 2006 Dec; 7():305. PubMed ID: 17140446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Genomic expression responses to DNA-damaging agents and the regulatory role of the yeast ATR homolog Mec1p.
Gasch AP; Huang M; Metzner S; Botstein D; Elledge SJ; Brown PO
Mol Biol Cell; 2001 Oct; 12(10):2987-3003. PubMed ID: 11598186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A genome-wide screen for methyl methanesulfonate-sensitive mutants reveals genes required for S phase progression in the presence of DNA damage.
Chang M; Bellaoui M; Boone C; Brown GW
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2002 Dec; 99(26):16934-9. PubMed ID: 12482937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transcriptional Profiling of the
Feng Y; Zhang Y; Li J; Omran RP; Whiteway M; Feng J
Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Jul; 23(14):. PubMed ID: 35886903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Characterization of a novel DNA damage-inducible gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, DIN7, which is a structural homolog of the RAD2 and RAD27 DNA repair genes.
Mieczkowski PA; Fikus MU; Ciesla Z
Mol Gen Genet; 1997 Feb; 253(6):655-65. PubMed ID: 9079876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The DNA-damage signature in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is associated with single-strand breaks in DNA.
Fry RC; DeMott MS; Cosgrove JP; Begley TJ; Samson LD; Dedon PC
BMC Genomics; 2006 Dec; 7():313. PubMed ID: 17163986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The pol3-t hyperrecombination phenotype and DNA damage-induced recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is RAD50 dependent.
Galli A; Hafer K; Cervelli T; Schiestl RH
J Biomed Biotechnol; 2009; 2009():312710. PubMed ID: 19834566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. DNA-damage induction of RAD54 can be regulated independently of the RAD9- and DDC1-dependent checkpoints that regulate RNR2.
Walsh L; Schmuckli-Maurer J; Billinton N; Barker MG; Heyer WD; Walmsley RM
Curr Genet; 2002 Jul; 41(4):232-40. PubMed ID: 12172964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The yeast copper response is regulated by DNA damage.
Dong K; Addinall SG; Lydall D; Rutherford JC
Mol Cell Biol; 2013 Oct; 33(20):4041-50. PubMed ID: 23959798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Global response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to an alkylating agent.
Jelinsky SA; Samson LD
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1999 Feb; 96(4):1486-91. PubMed ID: 9990050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Homolog of Saccharomyces cerevisiae SLX4 is required for cell recovery from MMS-induced DNA damage in Candida albicans.
Wang Y; Wang N; Liu J; Zhang Y; Li X; Han Q
FEMS Yeast Res; 2021 Mar; 21(2):. PubMed ID: 33606011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sequential recruitment of SAGA and TFIID in a genomic response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Ghosh S; Pugh BF
Mol Cell Biol; 2011 Jan; 31(1):190-202. PubMed ID: 20956559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Combined mutagenic action of chemicals and radiation in diploid yeast.
Anjaria KB; Madhvanath U
Mutat Res; 1983 May; 120(2-3):111-9. PubMed ID: 6405263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Role of the casein kinase I isoform, Hrr25, and the cell cycle-regulatory transcription factor, SBF, in the transcriptional response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Ho Y; Mason S; Kobayashi R; Hoekstra M; Andrews B
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1997 Jan; 94(2):581-6. PubMed ID: 9012827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The preference for error-free or error-prone postreplication repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae exposed to low-dose methyl methanesulfonate is cell cycle dependent.
Huang D; Piening BD; Paulovich AG
Mol Cell Biol; 2013 Apr; 33(8):1515-27. PubMed ID: 23382077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cell-cycle and DNA damage regulation of the DNA mismatch repair protein Msh2 occurs at the transcriptional and post-transcriptional level.
Tennen RI; Haye JE; Wijayatilake HD; Arlow T; Ponzio D; Gammie AE
DNA Repair (Amst); 2013 Feb; 12(2):97-109. PubMed ID: 23261051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Expression of UMP1 is inducible by DNA damage and required for resistance of S. cerevisiae cells to UV light.
Mieczkowski P; Dajewski W; Podlaska A; Skoneczna A; Ciesla Z; Sledziewska-Gójska E
Curr Genet; 2000 Aug; 38(2):53-9. PubMed ID: 10975253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Previously uncharacterized genes in the UV- and MMS-induced DNA damage response in yeast.
Hanway D; Chin JK; Xia G; Oshiro G; Winzeler EA; Romesberg FE
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2002 Aug; 99(16):10605-10. PubMed ID: 12149442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase mediates cellular responses to DNA damage and aging in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Kitanovic A; Wölfl S
Mutat Res; 2006 Feb; 594(1-2):135-47. PubMed ID: 16199065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tof1p regulates DNA damage responses during S phase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Foss EJ
Genetics; 2001 Feb; 157(2):567-77. PubMed ID: 11156979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
