These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17140532)

  • 1. Residual caries and marginal integrity in relation to Class II glass ionomer restorations in primary molars.
    Mhaville RJ; van Amerongen WE; Mandari GJ
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2006 Jun; 7(2):81-4. PubMed ID: 17140532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of residual caries and cervical gaps on the survival rate of Class II glass ionomer restorations.
    Roeleveld AC; van Amerongen WE; Mandari GJ
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2006 Jun; 7(2):85-91. PubMed ID: 17140533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adhesiveness of various glass ionomer cements in cavities treated with Carisolv.
    Yamada Y; Masuda Y; Kimura Y; Hossain M; Manabe A; Hisamitsu H
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2012; 37(2):183-7. PubMed ID: 23534327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of two tooth-saving preparation techniques for one-surface cavities.
    Rahimtoola S; van Amerongen E
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2002; 69(1):16-26, 11. PubMed ID: 12119808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Chemomechanical caries removal in primary molars : evaluation of marginal leakage and shear bond strength in bonded restorations--an in vitro study.
    Viral PM; Nagarathna C; Shakuntala BS
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2013; 37(3):269-74. PubMed ID: 23855171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conventional versus resin-modified glass-ionomer cement for Class II restorations in primary molars. A 3-year clinical study.
    Hübel S; Mejàre I
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2003 Jan; 13(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 12542617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical evaluation of glass-ionomer tunnel restorations in primary molars: 36 months results.
    Markovic D; Peric T
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Mar; 53(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 18304240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A randomized trial of resin-based restorations in class I and class II beveled preparations in primary molars: 24-month results.
    dos Santos MP; Passos M; Luiz RR; Maia LC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2009 Feb; 140(2):156-66; quiz 247-8. PubMed ID: 19188412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical evaluation of chemomechanical and mechanical caries removal: status of the restorations at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.
    Kirzioglu Z; Gurbuz T; Yilmaz Y
    Clin Oral Investig; 2007 Mar; 11(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 16969657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results.
    Yip HK; Smales RJ; Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11887531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results.
    Casagrande L; Dalpian DM; Ardenghi TM; Zanatta FB; Balbinot CE; García-Godoy F; De Araujo FB
    Am J Dent; 2013 Dec; 26(6):351-5. PubMed ID: 24640441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How effective is ART in the management of dental caries?
    Frencken JE; Holmgren CJ
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1999 Dec; 27(6):423-30. PubMed ID: 10600076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of cavity wall adaptation of bulk esthetic materials to restore class II cavities in primary molars.
    Gaintantzopoulou MD; Gopinath VK; Zinelis S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 May; 21(4):1063-1070. PubMed ID: 27165307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effectiveness of glass-ionomer (ART) and amalgam restorations in the deciduous dentition: results after 3 years.
    Taifour D; Frencken JE; Beiruti N; van 't Hof MA; Truin GJ
    Caries Res; 2002; 36(6):437-44. PubMed ID: 12459617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal microleakage of alternative restorative treatment and conventional glass ionomer restorations in extracted primary molars.
    Wadenya RO; Yego C; Mante FK
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2010; 77(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 20359427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical evaluation of three restorative materials applied in a minimal intervention caries treatment approach.
    Zanata RL; Navarro MF; Barbosa SH; Lauris JR; Franco EB
    J Public Health Dent; 2003; 63(4):221-6. PubMed ID: 14682645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Glass ionomer-silver cermet Class II tunnel-restorations for primary molars.
    Croll TP
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1988; 55(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 2968382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of a chlorhexidine containing cavity disinfectant on the clinical performance of high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement following ART: 24-month results.
    Ersin NK; Aykut A; Candan U; Onçağ O; Eronat C; Kose T
    Am J Dent; 2008 Feb; 21(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 18435375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Artificially formed caries-like lesions around Class II glass ionomer restorations in primary molars.
    Sepet E; Aytepe Z; Guven Y
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1995; 20(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 8634193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ART restorations and glass ionomer sealants in Zimbabwe: survival after 3 years.
    Frencken JE; Makoni F; Sithole WD
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1998 Dec; 26(6):372-81. PubMed ID: 9870536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.