These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17140634)

  • 1. Comparison of active and passive sampling for the determination of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in sewage treatment plants.
    Katsoyiannis A; Samara C
    Chemosphere; 2007 Apr; 67(7):1375-82. PubMed ID: 17140634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in the sewage treatment plant of Thessaloniki, northern Greece: occurrence and removal.
    Katsoyiannis A; Samara C
    Water Res; 2004 Jun; 38(11):2685-98. PubMed ID: 15207599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ecotoxicological evaluation of the wastewater treatment process of the sewage treatment plant of Thessaloniki, Greece.
    Katsoyiannis A; Samara C
    J Hazard Mater; 2007 Mar; 141(3):614-21. PubMed ID: 16973262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Uptake of some selected aquatic pollutants in semipermeable membrane devices (SPMDs) and the polar organic chemical integrative sampler (POCIS).
    Harman C; Bøyum O; Tollefsen KE; Thomas K; Grung M
    J Environ Monit; 2008 Feb; 10(2):239-47. PubMed ID: 18246218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in the conventional activated sludge treatment process: fate and mass balance.
    Katsoyiannis A; Samara C
    Environ Res; 2005 Mar; 97(3):245-57. PubMed ID: 15589233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance of semipermeable membrane devices for sampling of organic contaminants in groundwater.
    Vrana B; Paschke H; Paschke A; Popp P; Schuurmann G
    J Environ Monit; 2005 May; 7(5):500-8. PubMed ID: 15877173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in the conventional activated sludge treatment process: model predictions against experimental values.
    Katsoyiannis A; Zouboulis A; Samara C
    Chemosphere; 2006 Nov; 65(9):1634-41. PubMed ID: 16574188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Semipermeable membrane devices accumulate conserved ratios of sterane and hopane petroleum biomarkers.
    Luellen DR; Shea D
    Chemosphere; 2003 Nov; 53(7):705-13. PubMed ID: 13129510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Semi-quantitative analysis of a specific database on priority and emerging substances in wastewater and sludge.
    Ruel SM; Choubert JM; Ginestet P; Coquery M
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(12):1935-44. PubMed ID: 18587181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of emerging contaminants in sewage effluent and river water: comparison between spot and passive sampling.
    Zhang Z; Hibberd A; Zhou JL
    Anal Chim Acta; 2008 Jan; 607(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 18155407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comprehensive study of endocrine disrupting compounds using grab and passive sampling at selected wastewater treatment plants in South East Queensland, Australia.
    Tan BL; Hawker DW; Müller JF; Leusch FD; Tremblay LA; Chapman HF
    Environ Int; 2007 Jul; 33(5):654-69. PubMed ID: 17331577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fate and distribution of pharmaceuticals in wastewater and sewage sludge of the conventional activated sludge (CAS) and advanced membrane bioreactor (MBR) treatment.
    Radjenović J; Petrović M; Barceló D
    Water Res; 2009 Feb; 43(3):831-41. PubMed ID: 19091371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Priority pollutants in wastewater and combined sewer overflow.
    Gasperi J; Garnaud S; Rocher V; Moilleron R
    Sci Total Environ; 2008 Dec; 407(1):263-72. PubMed ID: 18814902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fast isolation of hydrophobic organic environmental contaminants from exposed semipermeable membrane devices (SPMDs) prior to GC analysis.
    Setková L; Hajslová J; Bergqvist PA; Kocourek V; Kazda R; Suchan P
    J Chromatogr A; 2005 Oct; 1092(2):170-81. PubMed ID: 16199223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Review of passive accumulation devices for monitoring organic micropollutants in the aquatic environment.
    Stuer-Lauridsen F
    Environ Pollut; 2005 Aug; 136(3):503-24. PubMed ID: 15862404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reduction of endocrine disruptor emissions in the environment: the benefit of wastewater treatment.
    Janex-Habibi ML; Huyard A; Esperanza M; Bruchet A
    Water Res; 2009 Apr; 43(6):1565-76. PubMed ID: 19203777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of extraction method of pharmaceuticals and their occurrences found in Japanese wastewater treatment plants.
    Okuda T; Yamashita N; Tanaka H; Matsukawa H; Tanabe K
    Environ Int; 2009 Jul; 35(5):815-20. PubMed ID: 19201472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Characterization of screenings from three municipal wastewater treatment plants in the Region Rhône-Alpes.
    Le Hyaric R; Canler JP; Barillon B; Naquin P; Gourdon R
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(2):525-31. PubMed ID: 19633396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Application of passive sampling devices for screening of micro-pollutants in marine aquaculture using LC-MS/MS.
    Martínez Bueno MJ; Hernando MD; Agüera A; Fernández-Alba AR
    Talanta; 2009 Feb; 77(4):1518-27. PubMed ID: 19084673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A holistic passive integrative sampling approach for assessing the presence and potential impacts of waterborne environmental contaminants.
    Petty JD; Huckins JN; Alvarez DA; Brumbaugh WG; Cranor WL; Gale RW; Rastall AC; Jones-Lepp TL; Leiker TJ; Rostad CE; Furlong ET
    Chemosphere; 2004 Feb; 54(6):695-705. PubMed ID: 14602102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.