476 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17141829)
21. Surgical resection for suburethral sling complications after treatment for stress urinary incontinence.
Misrai V; Rouprêt M; Xylinas E; Cour F; Vaessen C; Haertig A; Richard F; Chartier-Kastler E
J Urol; 2009 May; 181(5):2198-202; discussion 2203. PubMed ID: 19296973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Synthetic slings: which material, which approach.
Roth CC; Holley TD; Winters JC
Curr Opin Urol; 2006 Jul; 16(4):234-9. PubMed ID: 16770120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Early vs late midline sling lysis results in greater improvement in lower urinary tract symptoms.
South MM; Wu JM; Webster GD; Weidner AC; Roelands JJ; Amundsen CL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 May; 200(5):564.e1-5. PubMed ID: 19249728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Outcomes of Autologous Fascia Pubovaginal Sling for Patients with Transvaginal Mesh Related Complications Requiring Mesh Removal.
McCoy O; Vaughan T; Nickles SW; Ashley M; MacLachlan LS; Ginsberg D; Rovner E
J Urol; 2016 Aug; 196(2):484-9. PubMed ID: 26997314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Presentation and management of major complications of midurethral slings: Are complications under-reported?
Deng DY; Rutman M; Raz S; Rodriguez LV
Neurourol Urodyn; 2007; 26(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 17149713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Editorial comment on: complication rates of tension-free midurethral slings in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing tension-free midurethral tapes to other surgical procedures and different devices.
Waltregny D
Eur Urol; 2008 Feb; 53(2):308-9. PubMed ID: 18031924
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Perioperative complications: the first 140 polypropylene pubovaginal slings.
Kobashi KC; Govier FE
J Urol; 2003 Nov; 170(5):1918-21. PubMed ID: 14532807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Perioperative complications and early follow-up with 100 TVT-SECUR procedures.
Neuman M
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(4):480-4. PubMed ID: 18539095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Midurethral slings for stress urinary incontinence.
Kane AR; Nager CW
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Mar; 51(1):124-35. PubMed ID: 18303507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Complications of mid urethral slings: important outcomes for future clinical trials.
Daneshgari F; Kong W; Swartz M
J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):1890-7. PubMed ID: 18801499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of the local carcinogenic potential of mesh used in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence.
Linder BJ; Trabuco EC; Carranza DA; Gebhart JB; Klingele CJ; Occhino JA
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Sep; 27(9):1333-6. PubMed ID: 26864666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Urethral erosion of transobturator male sling.
Harris SE; Guralnick ML; O'Connor RC
Urology; 2009 Feb; 73(2):443.e19-20. PubMed ID: 18400275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Long-term Risk of Reoperation After Synthetic Mesh Midurethral Sling Surgery for Stress Urinary Incontinence.
Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Nov; 134(5):1047-1055. PubMed ID: 31599825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The midurethral polypropylene sling for stress incontinence: 22-month results of 81 patients.
Demirci F; Ozdemir I; Alhan A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2005 Jul; 272(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 15906054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Incidence of vaginal erosion with different synthetic materials for suburethral sling in the treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence: A systematic review.
Sivalingam N; Teng YH; Chong XY; Low CH; Manocha SK; Intan Sabreena MS
Med J Malaysia; 2018 Jun; 73(3):147-153. PubMed ID: 29962498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Correction of erosion after suburethral sling insertion for stress incontinence: results and related sexual function.
Kuhn A; Eggeman C; Burkhard F; Mueller MD
Eur Urol; 2009 Aug; 56(2):371-6. PubMed ID: 18684552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Results of collagen sling placement following the partial removal of a synthetic midurethral sling.
Hogewoning CR; Elzevier HW; Pelger RC; Hogewoning CJ
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Sep; 134(3):286-9. PubMed ID: 27432535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A multifilament polypropylene mesh for urinary incontinence: ten cases of infections requiring removal of the sling.
Richardson P; Petros P; Papadimitriou J
BJOG; 2006 Apr; 113(4):496-7; author reply 497-8. PubMed ID: 16553669
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Urethral mesh erosion after single-incision mid-urethral sling.
Minaglia S; Oyama IA
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2012; 18(5):310-2. PubMed ID: 22983279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Comparative study among autologous and synthetic slings in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence].
De Vita D; Araco F; Aydar Natalin R; Riccetto C; Nardi Pedro R; Palma P
Minerva Ginecol; 2008 Dec; 60(6):469-73. PubMed ID: 18981974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
