342 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17141845)
1. Pathologic outcome of laparoscopic and open radical prostatectomy.
Dahl DM; He W; Lazarus R; McDougal WS; Wu CL
Urology; 2006 Dec; 68(6):1253-6. PubMed ID: 17141845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surgical margin status of open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy specimens.
Terakawa T; Miyake H; Tanaka K; Takenaka A; Inoue TA; Fujisawa M
Int J Urol; 2008 Aug; 15(8):704-7; discussion 708. PubMed ID: 18462349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Bolenz C; Gupta A; Hotze T; Ho R; Cadeddu JA; Roehrborn CG; Lotan Y
Eur Urol; 2010 Mar; 57(3):453-8. PubMed ID: 19931979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The addition of robotic surgery to an established laparoscopic radical prostatectomy program: effect on positive surgical margins.
Trabulsi EJ; Linden RA; Gomella LG; McGinnis DE; Strup SE; Lallas CD
Can J Urol; 2008 Apr; 15(2):3994-9. PubMed ID: 18405448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of operative and functional outcomes of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and radical retropubic prostatectomy: single surgeon experience.
Ghavamian R; Knoll A; Boczko J; Melman A
Urology; 2006 Jun; 67(6):1241-6. PubMed ID: 16678887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative analysis of surgical margins between radical retropubic prostatectomy and RALP: are patients sacrificed during initiation of robotics program?
White MA; De Haan AP; Stephens DD; Maatman TK; Maatman TJ
Urology; 2009 Mar; 73(3):567-71. PubMed ID: 19167036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost comparison of laparoscopic versus radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Anderson JK; Murdock A; Cadeddu JA; Lotan Y
Urology; 2005 Sep; 66(3):557-60. PubMed ID: 16140077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic and radical retropubic prostatectomy generate similar positive margin rates in low and intermediate risk patients.
Laurila TA; Huang W; Jarrard DF
Urol Oncol; 2009; 27(5):529-33. PubMed ID: 18640061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of open and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy outcomes from a surgeon's early experience.
Wagner AA; Link RE; Trock BJ; Sullivan W; Pavlovich CP
Urology; 2007 Oct; 70(4):667-71. PubMed ID: 17991534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perioperative morbidity of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compared with open radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Brown JA; Garlitz C; Gomella LG; McGinnis DE; Diamond SM; Strup SE
Urol Oncol; 2004; 22(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 15082005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus extraperitoneal endoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Phinthusophon K; Nualyong C; Srinualnad S; Taweemonkongsap T; Amornvesukij T
J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Dec; 90(12):2644-50. PubMed ID: 18386715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal approach to laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: an assessment of 156 cases.
Brown JA; Rodin D; Lee B; Dahl DM
Urology; 2005 Feb; 65(2):320-4. PubMed ID: 15708046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Financial comparative analysis of minimally invasive surgery to open surgery for localized prostate cancer: a single-institution experience.
Mouraviev V; Nosnik I; Sun L; Robertson CN; Walther P; Albala D; Moul JW; Polascik TJ
Urology; 2007 Feb; 69(2):311-4. PubMed ID: 17320670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy - results of 200 consecutive cases in a Canadian medical institution.
Tse E; Knaus R
Can J Urol; 2004 Apr; 11(2):2172-85. PubMed ID: 15182406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: evaluation of specimen pathologic features to critically assess and modify surgical technique.
Soderdahl DW; Diaz JI; Rabah DM; Schellhammer PF; Fabrizio MD
Urology; 2005 Sep; 66(3):552-6. PubMed ID: 16140076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy at Ramathibodi Hospital, Thailand: a retrospective review.
Kongcharoensombat W; Tantirangsee N; Chaimuangraj S; Leelanuphun C; Kochakarn W; Patcharatrakul S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2012 Aug; 95(8):1035-40. PubMed ID: 23061307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differences among patients undergoing perineal or retropubic radical prostatectomy in pain and perioperative variables: a prospective study.
Paiva CS; Andreoni C; Cunha GP; Khalil W; Ortiz V
BJU Int; 2009 Nov; 104(9):1219-26. PubMed ID: 19389007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contemporary laparoscopic and open radical retropubic prostatectomy: pathologic outcomes and Kattan postoperative nomograms are equivalent.
Park S; Jaffer O; Lotan Y; Saboorian H; Roehrborn CG; Cadeddu JA
Urology; 2007 Jan; 69(1):118-22. PubMed ID: 17270631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk-adjusted analysis of positive surgical margins following laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Touijer K; Kuroiwa K; Eastham JA; Vickers A; Reuter VE; Scardino PT; Guillonneau B
Eur Urol; 2007 Oct; 52(4):1090-6. PubMed ID: 17188801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
